{"id":50915326,"url":"https://github.com/open-sci/2023-2024","last_synced_at":"2026-06-16T14:02:29.014Z","repository":{"id":181611393,"uuid":"666975003","full_name":"open-sci/2023-2024","owner":"open-sci","description":"The GitHub repository containing all the material related to the Open Science course of the Digital Humanities and Digital Knowledge degree at the University of Bologna (a.a. 2023/2024).","archived":false,"fork":false,"pushed_at":"2025-03-28T17:48:06.000Z","size":568,"stargazers_count":4,"open_issues_count":0,"forks_count":1,"subscribers_count":2,"default_branch":"main","last_synced_at":"2025-03-28T18:45:14.804Z","etag":null,"topics":[],"latest_commit_sha":null,"homepage":"","language":null,"has_issues":true,"has_wiki":null,"has_pages":null,"mirror_url":null,"source_name":null,"license":"isc","status":null,"scm":"git","pull_requests_enabled":true,"icon_url":"https://github.com/open-sci.png","metadata":{"files":{"readme":"README.md","changelog":null,"contributing":null,"funding":null,"license":"LICENSE","code_of_conduct":null,"threat_model":null,"audit":null,"citation":null,"codeowners":null,"security":null,"support":null,"governance":null,"roadmap":null,"authors":null,"dei":null,"publiccode":null,"codemeta":null}},"created_at":"2023-07-16T08:05:02.000Z","updated_at":"2025-03-28T17:48:10.000Z","dependencies_parsed_at":"2024-04-21T18:37:32.008Z","dependency_job_id":"1a887e97-d58d-478e-928a-2389c241b592","html_url":"https://github.com/open-sci/2023-2024","commit_stats":null,"previous_names":["open-sci/2023-2024"],"tags_count":0,"template":false,"template_full_name":null,"purl":"pkg:github/open-sci/2023-2024","repository_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2023-2024","tags_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2023-2024/tags","releases_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2023-2024/releases","manifests_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2023-2024/manifests","owner_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners/open-sci","download_url":"https://codeload.github.com/open-sci/2023-2024/tar.gz/refs/heads/main","sbom_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2023-2024/sbom","scorecard":null,"host":{"name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com","kind":"github","repositories_count":286080680,"owners_count":34408788,"icon_url":"https://github.com/github.png","version":null,"created_at":"2022-05-30T11:31:42.601Z","updated_at":"2026-05-26T15:22:16.424Z","status":"online","status_checked_at":"2026-06-16T02:00:06.860Z","response_time":126,"last_error":null,"robots_txt_status":"success","robots_txt_updated_at":"2025-07-24T06:49:26.215Z","robots_txt_url":"https://github.com/robots.txt","online":true,"can_crawl_api":true,"host_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub","repositories_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories","repository_names_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repository_names","owners_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners"}},"keywords":[],"created_at":"2026-06-16T14:02:28.125Z","updated_at":"2026-06-16T14:02:28.996Z","avatar_url":"https://github.com/open-sci.png","language":null,"funding_links":[],"categories":[],"sub_categories":[],"readme":"# Open Science\n\nThis space contains all the material related to the [Open Science course](https://www.unibo.it/it/didattica/insegnamenti/insegnamento/2023/443753) of the [Digital Humanities and Digital Knowledge](https://corsi.unibo.it/2cycle/DigitalHumanitiesKnowledge) degree at the [University of Bologna](https://www.unibo.it).\n\n## Academic year 2023/2024\n\n\n### Table of content\n- [Open Science](#open-science)\n  - [Academic year 2023/2024](#academic-year-20232024)\n    - [Table of content](#table-of-content)\n    - [Material](#material)\n    - [Extras](#extras)\n    - [Schedule](#schedule)\n\n\n### Material\n\n1. [20/03/24] Introduction to Open Science\n   * Introduction to the course: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/00.pdf)\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/01.pdf)\n   * Practical part (Project Presentation): [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/01H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography\n     * Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L., Burgio, K., Fournier, A., Keiser, C., Poisot, T., \u0026 Whitney, K. (2019). Open Science Isn’t Always Open to All Scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.1511/2019.107.2.78\n     * Daquino, M., Peroni, S., Shotton, D., Colavizza, G., Ghavimi, B., Lauscher, A., Mayr, P., Romanello, M., \u0026 Zumstein, P. (2020). The OpenCitations Data Model. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2020, 12507, 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_28\n     * Fecher, B., \u0026 Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In S. Bartling \u0026 S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 17–47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2\n     * Hendricks, G., Tkaczyk, D., Lin, J., \u0026 Feeney, P. (2020). Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00022\n     * Imming, M., \u0026 Tennant, J. (2018). Sticker open science: Just science done right. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1285575\n     * International DOI Foundation. (2019). DOI® Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1000/182\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Massari, A., Mariani, F., Heibi, I., Peroni, S., \u0026 Shotton, D. (2024). OpenCitations Meta. Quantitative Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00292\n     * Peroni, S., \u0026 Shotton, D. (2018). Open Citation: Definition. Figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6683855\n     * Peroni, S., \u0026 Shotton, D. (2020). OpenCitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00023\n     * Persiani, S., Daquino, M., \u0026 Peroni, S. (2022). A Programming Interface for Creating Data According to the SPAR Ontologies and the OpenCitations Data Model. In P. Groth, M.-E. Vidal, F. Suchanek, P. Szekley, P. Kapanipathi, C. Pesquita, H. Skaf-Molli, \u0026 M. Tamper (Eds.), The Semantic Web (Vol. 13261, pp. 305–322). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06981-9_18\n     * Reproducibility. (2021). In English Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility\n     * UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (Programme and Meeting Document SC-PCB-SPP/2021/OS/UROS; p. 36). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949\n     * Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., \u0026 Todd, M. H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature Chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n2. [22/03/24] Reproducibility\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/02.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/02H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography\n     * Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533(7604), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a\n     * Barzaghi, S., Bordignon, A., Gualandi, B., \u0026 Peroni, S. (2024). Thinking Outside the Black Box: Insights from a Digital Exhibition in the Humanities. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2402.12000\n     * Cobo, M. J., Dehdarirad, T., García-Sánchez, P., \u0026 Moral-Munoz, J. A. (2018). Quantifying the reproducibility of scientometric analyses: A case study. STI 2018 Conference Proceedings, 925–933. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/65242\n     * Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114\n     * Heibi, I., \u0026 Peroni, S. (2021). A qualitative and quantitative analysis of open citations to retracted articles: The Wakefield et al.’s case. Scientometrics, 126(10), 8433–8470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04097-5\n     * Heibi, I., \u0026 Peroni, S. (2022). A quantitative and qualitative open citation analysis of retracted articles in the humanities. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(4), 953–975. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00222\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Moylan, E. C., \u0026 Kowalczuk, M. K. (2016). Why articles are retracted: A retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. BMJ Open, 6(11), e012047. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047\n     * Peels, R. (2019). Replicability and replication in the humanities. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0060-4\n     * Peels, R., \u0026 Bouter, L. (2018). The possibility and desirability of replication in the humanities. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0149-x\n     * Peng, R. (2015). The reproducibility crisis in science: A statistical counterattack. Significance, 12(3), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00827.x\n     * Schnell, S. (2015). Ten Simple Rules for a Computational Biologist’s Laboratory Notebook. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(9), e1004385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004385\n     * Velden, T., Hinze, S., Scharnhorst, A., Schneider, J. W., \u0026 Waltman. (2018). Exploration of reproducibility issues in scientometric research. In R. Costas, T. Franssen, \u0026 A. Yegros-Yegros (Eds.), STI 2018 Conference Proceedings (pp. 612–624). Centre for Science and Technology Studies. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/65315\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n3. [27/03/24] FAIR and Open Data\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/03.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/03H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography\n     * Avanço, K., Balula, A., Błaszczyńska, M., Buchner, A., Caliman, L., Clivaz, C., Costa, C., Franczak, M., Gatti, R., Giglia, E., Gingold, A., Jarmelo, S., Padez, M. J., Leão, D., Maryl, M., Melinščak Zlodi, I., Mojsak, K., Morka, A., Mosterd, T., … Wieneke, L. (2021). Future of Scholarly Communication—Forging an inclusive and innovative research infrastructure for scholarly communication in Social Sciences and Humanities (p. 46). Digital Humanities Centre at the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5017705\n     * Belhajjame, K., B’Far, R., Cheney, J., Coppens, S., Cresswell, S., Gil, Y., Groth, P., Klyne, G., Lebo, T., McCusker, J., Miles, S., Myers, J., Sahoo, S., \u0026 Tilmes, C. (2013). PROV-DM: The PROV Data Model [W3C Recommendation]. World Wide Web Consortium. https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/\n     * Chue Hong, N. P., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Lamprecht, A.-L., Martinez, C., Psomopoulos, F. E., Harrow, J., Castro, L. J., Gruenpeter, M., Martinez, P. A., \u0026 Honeyman, T. (2022). FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles) [RDA Recommendation]. Research Data Alliance. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068\n     * GO FAIR. (2018). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/\n     * Gomes, D. G. E., Pottier, P., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Hudgins, E. J., Foroughirad, V., Sánchez-Reyes, L. L., Turba, R., Martinez, P. A., Moreau, D., Bertram, M. G., Smout, C. A., \u0026 Gaynor, K. M. (2022). Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289(1987), 20221113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1113\n     * Gualandi, B., Caldoni, G., \u0026 Marino, M. (2022). Research Data Management: Data Lifecycle [Diagram]. Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7249051\n     * Gualandi, B., Pareschi, L., \u0026 Peroni, S. (2022). What do we mean by ‘data’? A proposed classification of data types in the arts and humanities. Journal of Documentation, 79(7), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2022-0146\n     * Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., \u0026 Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Landi, A., Thompson, M., Giannuzzi, V., Bonifazi, F., Labastida, I., da Silva Santos, L. O. B., \u0026 Roos, M. (2020). The “A” of FAIR – As Open as Possible, as Closed as Necessary. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00027\n     * Lin, D., Crabtree, J., Dillo, I., Downs, R. R., Edmunds, R., Giaretta, D., De Giusti, M., L’Hours, H., Hugo, W., Jenkyns, R., Khodiyar, V., Martone, M. E., Mokrane, M., Navale, V., Petters, J., Sierman, B., Sokolova, D. V., Stockhause, M., \u0026 Westbrook, J. (2020). The TRUST Principles for digital repositories. Scientific Data, 7(1), 144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0486-7\n     * Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten Simple Rules for Creating a Good Data Management Plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(10), e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525\n     * Open Knowledge Foundation. (2015). Open Definition 2.1. https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/\n     * Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., \u0026 Haustein, S. (2017). Data From: The State Of Oa: A Large-Scale Analysis Of The Prevalence And Impact Of Open Access Articles [dataset]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.837901\n     * Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), L119, Official Journal of the European Union (2016). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj\n     * Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18\n     * Wolfe, M. (2017, August 9). CC0 and Data Citation. https://www.library.ucdavis.edu/news/cc0-and-data-citation/\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n4. [03/04/24] Open Methodology\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/04.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/04H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography\n     * Beg, M., Taka, J., Kluyver, T., Konovalov, A., Ragan-Kelley, M., Thiery, N. M., \u0026 Fangohr, H. (2021). Using Jupyter for Reproducible Scientific Workflows. Computing in Science \u0026 Engineering, 23(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3052101\n     * Belhajjame, K., Zhao, J., Garijo, D., Gamble, M., Hettne, K., Palma, R., Mina, E., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, J. M., Bechhofer, S., Klyne, G., \u0026 Goble, C. (2015). Using a suite of ontologies for preserving workflow-centric research objects. Journal of Web Semantics, 32, 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003\n     * Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an Effective Literature Review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 39(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009\n     * Celebi, R., Rebelo Moreira, J., Hassan, A. A., Ayyar, S., Ridder, L., Kuhn, T., \u0026 Dumontier, M. (2020). Towards FAIR protocols and workflows: The OpenPREDICT use case. PeerJ Computer Science, 6, e281. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.281\n     * Clarke, P., Buckell, J., \u0026 Barnett, A. (2020). Registered Reports: Time to Radically Rethink Peer Review in Health Economics. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-00190-x\n     * Crusoe, M. R., Abeln, S., Iosup, A., Amstutz, P., Chilton, J., Tijanić, N., Ménager, H., Soiland-Reyes, S., Gavrilović, B., Goble, C., \u0026 Community, T. C. (2022). Methods included: Standardizing computational reuse and portability with the Common Workflow Language. Communications of the ACM, 65(6), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486897\n     * Goble, C., Cohen-Boulakia, S., Soiland-Reyes, S., Garijo, D., Gil, Y., Crusoe, M. R., Peters, K., \u0026 Schober, D. (2020). FAIR Computational Workflows. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00033\n     * Hrynaszkiewicz, I. (2020, December 7). Show your work. Peer-Reviewed Protocols. The Official PLOS Blog. https://theplosblog.plos.org/2020/12/show-your-work-peer-reviewed-protocols/\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Perneger, T. V. (2004). Writing a research article: Advice to beginners. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16(3), 191–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzh053\n     * Teytelman, L., Stoliartchouk, A., Kindler, L., \u0026 Hurwitz, B. L. (2016). Protocols.io: Virtual Communities for Protocol Development and Discussion. PLOS Biology, 14(8), e1002538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002538\n     * Watson, M. (2015). When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? Genome Biology, 16(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0669-2\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n5. [05/04/24] Open Peer Review\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/05.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/05H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography\n     * Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. (2022). Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment [Policy]. European Science Foundation. https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/\n     * Economic and Social Research Council, UKRI. (2019). Data management plan: Guidance for peer reviewers. https://esrc.ukri.org/files/about-us/policies-and-standards/data-management-plan-guidance-for-per-reviewers/\n     * Eve, M. P., Neylon, C., O’Donnell, D. P., Moore, S., Gadie, R., Odeniyi, V., \u0026 Parvin, S. (2020). Reading Peer Review (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108783521\n     * Gangemi, A., Peroni, S., Shotton, D. M., \u0026 Vitali, F. (2017). The Publishing Workflow Ontology (PWO). Semantic Web, 8(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-160230, available in OA at http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/system/files/swj1301.pdf \n     * Janowicz, K., \u0026 Hitzler, P. (2012). Open and transparent: The review process of the Semantic Web journal. Learned Publishing, 25(1), 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120107\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * McPeek, M. A., DeAngelis, D. L., Shaw, R. G., Moore, A. J., Rausher, M. D., Strong, D. R., Ellison, A. M., Barrett, L., Rieseberg, L., Breed, M. D., Sullivan, J., Osenberg, C. W., Holyoak, M., \u0026 Elgar, M. A. (2009). The Golden Rule of Reviewing. The American Naturalist, 173(5), E155–E158. https://doi.org/10.1086/598847\n     * Reviewer’s rights and duties. (2019). https://open-sci.github.io/review/\n     * Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2\n     * Snodgrass, R. T. (2007). Editorial: Single- versus double-blind reviewing. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 32(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/1206049.1206050\n     * Stiller-Reeve, M. (2018). How to write a thorough peer review. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06991-0\n     * Tennant, J. P. (2018). The state of the art in peer review. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(19). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny204\n     * Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, et al. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications, 7(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034 \n     * Tennant, J. P., Dugan, J. M., Graziotin, D., Jacques, D. C., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., Elkhatib, Y., B. Collister, L., Pikas, C. K., Crick, T., Masuzzo, P., Caravaggi, A., Berg, D. R., Niemeyer, K. E., Ross-Hellauer, T., Mannheimer, S., Rigling, L., Katz, D. S., Greshake Tzovaras, B., … Colomb, J. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6, 1151. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3\n     * UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (Programme and Meeting Document SC-PCB-SPP/2021/OS/UROS; p. 36). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949\n     * Waltman, L., \u0026 Polka, J. (2022, July 7). Making sense of preprints by adding context – The Publish Your Reviews initiative [Blog]. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/07/07/making-sense-of-preprints-by-adding-context-the-publish-your-reviews-initiative/\n     * Waltman, L., Larivière, V., \u0026 Milojević, S. (2022, March 17). Quantitative Science Studies successfully completes transparent peer review pilot [Blog]. ISSI Blog. https://www.issi-society.org/blog/posts/2022/march/quantitative-science-studies-successfully-completes-transparent-peer-review-pilot/\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n6. [10/04/24] Open Source Software\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/06.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/06H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography:\n     * Abramatic, J.-F., Di Cosmo, R., \u0026 Zacchiroli, S. (2018). Building the universal archive of source code. Communications of the ACM, 61(10), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183558, available in OA at https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02157125\n     * Alliez, P., Cosmo, R. D., Guedj, B., Girault, A., Hacid, M.-S., Legrand, A., \u0026 Rougier, N. (2020). Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook From Inria. Computing in Science \u0026 Engineering, 22(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2949413, available in OA at https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02135891\n     * Chacon, S., \u0026 Straub, B. (2014). Pro Git (Second edition). Apress. https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2\n     * Cohen, J., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Chue Hong, N., Haines, R., \u0026 Jay, C. (2021). The Four Pillars of Research Software Engineering. IEEE Software, 38(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2020.2973362, available in OA at https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.01035\n     * Cosmo, R. D., Gruenpeter, M., \u0026 Zacchiroli, S. (2020). Referencing Source Code Artifacts: A Separate Concern in Software Citation. Computing in Science \u0026 Engineering, 22(2), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2963148, available in OA at https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.08647\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Lamprecht, A.-L., Garcia, L., Kuzak, M., Martinez, C., Arcila, R., Martin Del Pico, E., Dominguez Del Angel, V., van de Sandt, S., Ison, J., Martinez, P. A., McQuilton, P., Valencia, A., Harrow, J., Psomopoulos, F., Gelpi, J. Ll., Chue Hong, N., Goble, C., \u0026 Capella-Gutierrez, S. (2020). Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Science, 3(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.3233/DS-190026\n     * Martinez-Ortiz, C., Martinez Lavanchy, P., Sesink, L., Olivier, B. G., Meakin, J., de Jong, M., \u0026 Cruz, M. (2023). Practical guide to Software Management Plans (Version 1.1). Netherlands eScience Center and NWO. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7589725\n     * Nuvolari, A. (2005). Open source software development: Some historical perspectives. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v10i10.1284\n     * Open Source Initiative. (2007). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd\n     * Prlić, A., \u0026 Procter, J. B. (2012). Ten Simple Rules for the Open Development of Scientific Software. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(12), e1002802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002802\n     * Raymond, E. S. (2000). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary (Version 3.0). O’Reilly Media. http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/\n     * Smith, A. M., Katz, D. S., Niemeyer, K. E., \u0026 FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group. (2016). Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e86. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86\n     * Tennant, J., Agarwal, R., Baždarić, K., Brassard, D., Crick, T., Dunleavy, D. J., Evans, T. R., Gardner, N., Gonzalez-Marquez, M., Graziotin, D., Greshake Tzovaras, B., Gunnarsson, D., Havemann, J., Hosseini, M., Katz, D. S., Knöchelmann, M., Madan, C. R., Manghi, P., Marocchino, A., … Yarkoni, T. (2020). A tale of two ‘opens’: Intersections between Free and Open Source Software and Open Scholarship [Preprint]. SocArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/2kxq8\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n7. [17/04/24] Open Access\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/07.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/07H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography:\n     * Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L., Burgio, K., Fournier, A., Keiser, C., Poisot, T., \u0026 Whitney, K. (2019). Open Science Isn’t Always Open to All Scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.1511/2019.107.2.78\n     * Bosman, J., Frantsvåg, J. E., Kramer, B., Langlais, P.-C., \u0026 Proudman, V. (2021). OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4558704\n     * Brainard, J. (2021). Open access takes flight. Science, 371(6524), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.371.6524.16\n     * Chan, L., Cuplinskas, D., Eisen, M., Friend, F., Genova, Y., Guédon, J.-C., Hagemann, M., Harnad, S., Johnson, R., Kupryte, R., La Manna, M., Rév, I., Segbert, M., de Souza, S., Suber, P., \u0026 Velterop, J. (2002). Read the Budapest Open Access Initiative. https://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read\n     * Cobb, M. (2017). The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s. PLOS Biology, 15(11), e2003995. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995\n     * Else, H. (2021). A guide to Plan S: The open-access initiative shaking up science publishing. Nature, d41586-021-00883–00886. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00883-6\n     * European Union. (2015). Open access. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/docs/h2020-funding-guide/cross-cutting-issues/open-access-data-management/open-access_en.htm\n     * Fyfe, A. (2021). Self-help for learned journals: Scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s. History of Science, 007327532199990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275321999901\n     * Kallestinova, E. D. (2011). How to write your first research paper. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, 84(3), 181–190. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3178846/\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Logan, C. J. (2017). We can shift academic culture through publishing choices. F1000Research, 6, 518. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11415.2\n     * Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., \u0026 Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375\n     * Redhead, C. (2012, October 23). Why CC-BY? Blog of the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association. https://oaspa.org/why-cc-by/\n     * Tennant, J. (2018). What do penguins, Gimli, and cobras have to do with Open Science? DARIAH Annual Event 2018, Paris, France. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.6326339.V1\n     * Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, T., Davila, J., Enkhbayar, A., Havemann, J., Kramer, B., Martin, R., Masuzzo, P., Nobes, A., Rice, C., Rivera-López, B., Ross-Hellauer, T., Sattler, S., Thacker, P. D., \u0026 Vanholsbeeck, M. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications, 7(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034\n     * Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., \u0026 Hartgerink, Chris. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3\n     * UNESCO. (2013). UNESCO Open Access Publications. https://en.unesco.org/open-access/\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n8. [19/04/24] Open Metrics\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/08.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/08H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography:\n     * Artrake Studio. (2020, June). What can DNA test really tell us about our ancestry? https://www.ted.com/talks/prosanta_chakrabarty_what_can_dna_tests_really_tell_us_about_our_ancestry\n     * Baccini, A., De Nicolao, G., \u0026 Petrovich, E. (2019). Citation gaming induced by bibliometric evaluation: A country-level comparative analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(9), e0221212. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221212\n     * Cagan, R. (2013). The San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Disease Models \u0026 Mechanisms, 6(4), 869–870. https://doi.org/10.1242/dmm.012955\n     * Cameron, R. D. (1997). A Universal Citation Database As a Catalyst For Reform In Scholarly Communication. First Monday, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i4.522\n     * Else, H. (2018). How Unpaywall is transforming open science. Nature, 560(7718), 290–291. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05968-3\n     * Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108, available in OA at http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v6p468y1983.pdf)\n     * Garfield, E. (2006). The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90, available in OA at https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jamajif2006.pdf)\n     * Haak, L. L., Fenner, M., Paglione, L., Pentz, E., \u0026 Ratner, H. (2012). ORCID: A system to uniquely identify researchers. Learned Publishing, 25(4), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1087/20120404\n     * Hendricks, G., Kramer, B., Maccallum, C., Manghi, P., Neylon, C., Peroni, S., Shotton, D., Tay, A., \u0026 Waltman, L. (2021, ottobre 27). Now is the time to work together toward open infrastructures for scholarly metadata. [Blog]. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2021/10/27/now-is-the-time-to-work-together-toward-open-infrastructures-for-scholarly-metadata/ \n     * Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., \u0026 Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Larivière, V., \u0026 Sugimoto, C. R. (2019). The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects. In W. Glänzel, H. F. Moed, U. Schmoch, \u0026 M. Thelwall (Eds.), Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 3–24). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_1, availablie in OA at https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08992\n     * Mohammadi, E., Thelwall, M., Kwasny, M., \u0026 Holmes, K. L. (2018). Academic information on Twitter: A user survey. PLOS ONE, 13(5), e0197265. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197265\n     * Priem, J., Groth, P., \u0026 Taraborelli, D. (2012). The Altmetrics Collection. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e48753. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048753\n     * Rettberg, N., \u0026 Schmidt, B. (2012). OpenAIRE - Building a collaborative Open Access infrastructure for European researchers. LIBER Quarterly, 22(3), 160. https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.8110\n     * Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, T., Davila, J., Enkhbayar, A., Havemann, J., Kramer, B., Martin, R., Masuzzo, P., Nobes, A., Rice, C., Rivera-López, B., Ross-Hellauer, T., Sattler, S., Thacker, P. D., \u0026 Vanholsbeeck, M. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications, 7(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034\n     * Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., \u0026 Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112\n     * Waltman, L. (2020, September 9). Responsible research assessment requires open scholarly metadata. Workshop on Open Citations and Open Scholarly Metadata 2020, Bologna, Italy. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4021492\n     * Wang, K., Shen, Z., Huang, C., Wu, C.-H., Dong, Y., \u0026 Kanakia, A. (2020). Microsoft Academic Graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00021\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n9. [24/04/24] Open Infrastructures\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/09.pdf)\n   * Practical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2023-2024/slides/09H.pdf)\n   * Bibliography:\n     * Alexandrov, A. V., \u0026 Hennerici, M. G. (2013). How to Prepare and Deliver a Scientific Presentation. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 35(3), 202–208. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346077\n     * Allen, L., O’Connell, A., \u0026 Kiermer, V. (2019). How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1210\n     * Aspesi, C., \u0026 Brand, A. (2020). In pursuit of open science, open access is not enough. Science, 368(6491), 574–577. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba3763\n     * Bilder, G., Lin, J., \u0026 Neylon, C. (2020). The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure. The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure. https://doi.org/10.24343/C34W2H\n     * Burgelman, J.-C. (2021). Politics and Open Science: How the European Open Science Cloud Became Reality (the Untold Story). Data Intelligence, 3(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00069\n     * Doumont, J. (2011). Creating Effective Presentation Slides. Optics \u0026 Photonics News, 22(3), 12–14. https://www.osa-opn.org/home/articles/volume_22/issue_3/departments/career_focus/creating_effective_presentation_slides/\n     * European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures. (2021). Roadmap 2021: Strategy Report on Research Infrastructures. Università degli Studi di Milano. https://roadmap2021.esfri.eu/\n     * Ficarra, V., Fosci, M., Chiarelli, A., Kramer, B., \u0026 Proudman, V. (2020). Scoping the Open Science Infrastructure Landscape in Europe. SPARC Europe. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4159838\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Janssen, R., Gramsbergen, E., de Smaele, M., Teperek, M., \u0026 Popescu, I. (2023, January 30). We are going free and open source! [Blog]. 4TU.ResearchData Community. https://community.data.4tu.nl/2023/01/30/we-are-going-free-and-open-source/  \n     * Skinner, K., \u0026 Lippincott, S. (2020). Assessment Checklist (Commonplace). Knowledge Futures Group. https://doi.org/10.21428/6ffd8432.5175bab1/00710d8a\n     * Teal, T., Lowenberg, D., Smith, T., Gonzales, J. B., Nielsen, L. H., \u0026 Ioannidis, A. (2020, August 26). Sustainable, Open Source Alternatives Exist [Blog]. Dryad News and Views. https://blog.datadryad.org/2020/08/26/sustainable-infrastructure-exists/\n     * Teperek, M., \u0026 Dunning, A. (2020, August 18). Why figshare? Choosing a new technical infrastructure for 4TU.ResearchData [Blog]. Open Working. https://openworking.wordpress.com/2020/08/18/why-figshare-choosing-a-new-technical-infrastructure-for-4tu-researchdata/\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n10. [08/05/24] Final seminar \n    * Title: Open science: in dialogue with society\n    * Abstract: We shall explore the two-way connection among science and society - as Open Science is not just \"sharing\" at the end of the process, it's a different way of creating knowledge starting from the beginning, and possibly co-creating it. After discussing the potentiality of citizen science, we shall delve into the realm of science communication with a focus on science for policy, for a truly evidence-informed policy making.\n    * Speaker: Elena Giglia, PhD, Masters' Degree in Librarianship and Masters' Degree in Public Institutions Management, is Head of the Open Science Unit at the University of Turin. She has been part of the European Open Science network for many years, attending national and international conferences, and writing and lecturing on Open Access and Open Science. She was a member (2019-2020) of the Committee on Open Science at the Ministry for University and Research (MUR). She actively collaborates with the ICDI – Italian Computer and Data Infrastructure Competence center on Open Science, EOSC and FAIR data and with several national and international projects. She represents OPERAS Research Infrastructure in the EOSC Association. She serves in several Scientific Committees and Advisory Boards.\n    \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n11. [27 May 2024, 10:00-13:00] Workshop\n    * 10:00-10:15: welcoming and instructions\n    * 10:15-10:30: presentation of the invited experts\n    * 10:30-11:30: project presentation by [Harkonnen](https://github.com/open-sci/2023-2024/blob/main/docs/Harkonnen/material.md)\n    * 11:30-11:45: break\n    * 11:45-12:45: project presentation by [Atreides](https://github.com/open-sci/2023-2024/blob/main/docs/Atreides/material.md)\n\n### Extras\n\nVideo presentations about Open Science stuff:\n* Tennant, J. (2018, May 23). Open Science is just good science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEEcwRUgQu8\n* Suber, P. (2021, April 14). Let’s talk about...Open Science Infrastructure with Peter Suber (A. Morka, Interviewer) [Youtube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwSoFKFCjic\n* Thaney, K. (2021, April 23). Let’s talk about... Open Science Infrastructure with Kaitlin Thaney (A. Morka, Interviewer) [Youtube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFk2hbtwmqU\n\n\n### Schedule\n\n\u003ctable\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e20/03/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eIntroduction to Open Science\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e22/03/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eReproducibility\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e27/03/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eFAIR and Open Data\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e03/04/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Methodology\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e05/04/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Peer Review\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e10/04/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Source Software\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e17/04/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Access\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e19/04/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Metrics\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e24/04/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Infrastructures\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e08/05/24\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eFinal seminar\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n","project_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fopen-sci%2F2023-2024","html_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/projects/github.com%2Fopen-sci%2F2023-2024","lists_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fopen-sci%2F2023-2024/lists"}