{"id":50915367,"url":"https://github.com/open-sci/2024-2025","last_synced_at":"2026-06-16T14:02:55.657Z","repository":{"id":251895997,"uuid":"838723422","full_name":"open-sci/2024-2025","owner":"open-sci","description":"The GitHub repository containing all the material related to the Open Science course of the Digital Humanities and Digital Knowledge degree at the University of Bologna (a.a. 2024/2025). ","archived":false,"fork":false,"pushed_at":"2026-04-08T09:54:55.000Z","size":151476,"stargazers_count":3,"open_issues_count":7,"forks_count":1,"subscribers_count":1,"default_branch":"main","last_synced_at":"2026-04-08T11:29:53.308Z","etag":null,"topics":[],"latest_commit_sha":null,"homepage":null,"language":"Jupyter Notebook","has_issues":true,"has_wiki":null,"has_pages":null,"mirror_url":null,"source_name":null,"license":null,"status":null,"scm":"git","pull_requests_enabled":true,"icon_url":"https://github.com/open-sci.png","metadata":{"files":{"readme":"README.md","changelog":null,"contributing":null,"funding":null,"license":null,"code_of_conduct":null,"threat_model":null,"audit":null,"citation":"CITATION.cff","codeowners":null,"security":null,"support":null,"governance":null,"roadmap":null,"authors":null,"dei":null,"publiccode":null,"codemeta":null,"zenodo":null,"notice":null,"maintainers":null,"copyright":null,"agents":null,"dco":null,"cla":null}},"created_at":"2024-08-06T08:06:36.000Z","updated_at":"2026-04-08T09:55:02.000Z","dependencies_parsed_at":"2025-05-26T12:34:26.811Z","dependency_job_id":"f917dbec-65e6-45b8-adb2-46f2ad7065b2","html_url":"https://github.com/open-sci/2024-2025","commit_stats":null,"previous_names":["open-sci/2024-2025"],"tags_count":2,"template":false,"template_full_name":null,"purl":"pkg:github/open-sci/2024-2025","repository_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2024-2025","tags_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2024-2025/tags","releases_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2024-2025/releases","manifests_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2024-2025/manifests","owner_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners/open-sci","download_url":"https://codeload.github.com/open-sci/2024-2025/tar.gz/refs/heads/main","sbom_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/open-sci%2F2024-2025/sbom","scorecard":null,"host":{"name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com","kind":"github","repositories_count":286080680,"owners_count":34408788,"icon_url":"https://github.com/github.png","version":null,"created_at":"2022-05-30T11:31:42.601Z","updated_at":"2026-05-26T15:22:16.424Z","status":"online","status_checked_at":"2026-06-16T02:00:06.860Z","response_time":126,"last_error":null,"robots_txt_status":"success","robots_txt_updated_at":"2025-07-24T06:49:26.215Z","robots_txt_url":"https://github.com/robots.txt","online":true,"can_crawl_api":true,"host_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub","repositories_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories","repository_names_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repository_names","owners_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners"}},"keywords":[],"created_at":"2026-06-16T14:02:54.683Z","updated_at":"2026-06-16T14:02:55.595Z","avatar_url":"https://github.com/open-sci.png","language":"Jupyter Notebook","funding_links":[],"categories":[],"sub_categories":[],"readme":"# Open Science\n\nThis space contains all the material related to the [Open Science course](https://www.unibo.it/it/didattica/insegnamenti/insegnamento/2024/443753) of the [Digital Humanities and Digital Knowledge](https://corsi.unibo.it/2cycle/DigitalHumanitiesKnowledge) degree at the [University of Bologna](https://www.unibo.it).\n\n## Academic year 2024/2025\n\n\n### Table of content\n- [Open Science](#open-science)\n  - [Academic year 2024/2025](#academic-year-20242025)\n    - [Table of content](#table-of-content)\n    - [Material](#material)\n    - [Extras](#extras)\n    - [Schedule](#schedule)\n\n\n### Material\n\n1. [31/3/25] Introduction to Open Science\n   * Introduction to the course: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/00.pdf)\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/01.pdf)\n   * Project Presentation: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/01H.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Bahlai, C., Bartlett, L., Burgio, K., Fournier, A., Keiser, C., Poisot, T., \u0026 Whitney, K. (2019). Open Science Isn’t Always Open to All Scientists. American Scientist, 107(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.1511/2019.107.2.78\n     * Fecher, B., \u0026 Friesike, S. (2014). Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In S. Bartling \u0026 S. Friesike (Eds.), Opening Science (pp. 17–47). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2\n     * Imming, M., \u0026 Tennant, J. (2018). Sticker open science: Just science done right [Graphic]. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1285575\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009416368\n     * Reproducibility. (2025). In English Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility\n     * UNESCO. (2018). Recommendation on Science and Scientific Researchers (Programme and Meeting Document SHS/BIO/PI/2017/3 Rev; p. 24). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000263618\n     * UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (Programme and Meeting Document SC-PCB-SPP/2021/OS/UROS; p. 36). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n2. [3/4/25] Reproducibility\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Meng, X.-L. (2020). Reproducibility, Replicability, and Reliability. Harvard Data Science Review, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.dbfce7f9 \n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/02.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 533(7604), 452–454. https://doi.org/10.1038/533452a\n     * European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation, Baker, L., Cristea, I. A., Errington, T. M., Jaśko, K., Lusoli, W., MacCallum, C. J., Parry, V., Pérignon, C., Šimko, T., \u0026 Winchester, C. (2020). Reproducibility of scientific results in the EU: Scoping report (W. Lusoli, Ed.). Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2777/341654\n     * Fanelli, D. (2018). Opinion: Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114\n     * Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., \u0026 Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016). What does research reproducibility mean? Science Translational Medicine, 8(341). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027 (OA at https://osf.io/dw23g)\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Peng, R. (2015). The reproducibility crisis in science: A statistical counterattack. Significance, 12(3), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2015.00827.x\n     * UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (Programme and Meeting Document SC-PCB-SPP/2021/OS/UROS; p. 36). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n3. [7/4/25] FAIR and Open Data\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., Sara, R., Walker, J. D., Anderson, J., \u0026 Hudson, M. (2020). The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. Data Science Journal, 19, 43. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-043\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/03.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Avanço, K., Balula, A., Błaszczyńska, M., Buchner, A., Caliman, L., Clivaz, C., Costa, C., Franczak, M., Gatti, R., Giglia, E., Gingold, A., Jarmelo, S., Padez, M. J., Leão, D., Maryl, M., Melinščak Zlodi, I., Mojsak, K., Morka, A., Mosterd, T., … Wieneke, L. (2021). Future of Scholarly Communication—Forging an inclusive and innovative research infrastructure for scholarly communication in Social Sciences and Humanities (p. 46). Digital Humanities Centre at the Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5017705\n     * Caldoni, G., Gualandi, B., \u0026 Marino, M. (2022). Research Data Management: Decision Tree [Decision tree]. Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7190005\n     * Chue Hong, N. P., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Lamprecht, A.-L., Martinez, C., Psomopoulos, F. E., Harrow, J., Castro, L. J., Gruenpeter, M., Martinez, P. A., \u0026 Honeyman, T. (2022). FAIR Principles for Research Software (FAIR4RS Principles) [RDA Recommendation]. Research Data Alliance. https://doi.org/10.15497/RDA00068\n     * Gomes, D. G. E., Pottier, P., Crystal-Ornelas, R., Hudgins, E. J., Foroughirad, V., Sánchez-Reyes, L. L., Turba, R., Martinez, P. A., Moreau, D., Bertram, M. G., Smout, C. A., \u0026 Gaynor, K. M. (2022). Why don’t we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 289(1987), 20221113. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2022.1113\n     * Gualandi, B., Caldoni, G., \u0026 Marino, M. (2022). Research Data Management: Data Lifecycle [Diagram]. Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7249051\n     * Gualandi, B., Pareschi, L., \u0026 Peroni, S. (2022). What do we mean by ‘data’? A proposed classification of data types in the arts and humanities. Journal of Documentation, 79(7), 51–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-07-2022-0146\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Landi, A., Thompson, M., Giannuzzi, V., Bonifazi, F., Labastida, I., da Silva Santos, L. O. B., \u0026 Roos, M. (2020). The “A” of FAIR – As Open as Possible, as Closed as Necessary. Data Intelligence, 2(1–2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00027\n     * Open Knowledge Foundation. (2015, November). Open Definition 2.1. https://opendefinition.org/od/2.1/en/\n     * Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation), L119, Official Journal of the European Union (2016). http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj\n     * Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n4. [10/4/25] Open Methodology\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Chigbu, U. E., Atiku, S. O., \u0026 Du Plessis, C. C. (2023). The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising. Publications, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11010002\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/04.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Beg, M., Taka, J., Kluyver, T., Konovalov, A., Ragan-Kelley, M., Thiery, N. M., \u0026 Fangohr, H. (2021). Using Jupyter for Reproducible Scientific Workflows. Computing in Science \u0026 Engineering, 23(2), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3052101\n     * Belhajjame, K., Zhao, J., Garijo, D., Gamble, M., Hettne, K., Palma, R., Mina, E., Corcho, O., Gómez-Pérez, J. M., Bechhofer, S., Klyne, G., \u0026 Goble, C. (2015). Using a suite of ontologies for preserving workflow-centric research objects. Journal of Web Semantics, 32, 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2015.01.003\n     * Bolderston, A. (2008). Writing an Effective Literature Review. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 39(2), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2008.04.009\n     * Clarke, P., Buckell, J., \u0026 Barnett, A. (2020). Registered Reports: Time to Radically Rethink Peer Review in Health Economics. PharmacoEconomics - Open, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-019-00190-x\n     * Crusoe, M. R., Abeln, S., Iosup, A., Amstutz, P., Chilton, J., Tijanić, N., Ménager, H., Soiland-Reyes, S., Gavrilović, B., Goble, C., \u0026 Community, T. C. (2022). Methods included: Standardizing computational reuse and portability with the Common Workflow Language. Communications of the ACM, 65(6), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3486897\n     * Hrynaszkiewicz, I. (2020, December 7). Show your work. Peer-Reviewed Protocols. The Official PLOS Blog. https://theplosblog.plos.org/2020/12/show-your-work-peer-reviewed-protocols/\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Perneger, T. V. (2004). Writing a research article: Advice to beginners. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 16(3), 191–192. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzh053\n     * Watson, M. (2015). When will ‘open science’ become simply ‘science’? Genome Biology, 16(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-015-0669-2\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n5. [14/4/25] Open Peer Review\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Papanas, N., \u0026 Mikhailidis, D. P. (2024). Alice through the Looking-glass: Can We Improve Peer Review? The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds, 23(3), 356–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346221084784\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/05.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. (2022). Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment [Policy]. European Science Foundation. https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/\n     * Eve, M. P., Neylon, C., O’Donnell, D. P., Moore, S., Gadie, R., Odeniyi, V., \u0026 Parvin, S. (2020). Reading Peer Review (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108783521\n     * Gangemi, A., Peroni, S., Shotton, D. M., \u0026 Vitali, F. (2017). The Publishing Workflow Ontology (PWO). Semantic Web, 8(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-160230\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2\n     * Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, T., Davila, J., Enkhbayar, A., Havemann, J., Kramer, B., Martin, R., Masuzzo, P., Nobes, A., Rice, C., Rivera-López, B., Ross-Hellauer, T., Sattler, S., Thacker, P. D., \u0026 Vanholsbeeck, M. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications, 7(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034\n     * Tennant, J. P., Dugan, J. M., Graziotin, D., Jacques, D. C., Waldner, F., Mietchen, D., Elkhatib, Y., B. Collister, L., Pikas, C. K., Crick, T., Masuzzo, P., Caravaggi, A., Berg, D. R., Niemeyer, K. E., Ross-Hellauer, T., Mannheimer, S., Rigling, L., Katz, D. S., Greshake Tzovaras, B., … Colomb, J. (2017). A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review. F1000Research, 6, 1151. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.3\n     * UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science (Programme and Meeting Document SC-PCB-SPP/2021/OS/UROS; p. 36). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379949\n     * Waltman, L., \u0026 Polka, J. (2022, July 7). Making sense of preprints by adding context – The Publish Your Reviews initiative [Blog]. LSE Impact Blog. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2022/07/07/making-sense-of-preprints-by-adding-context-the-publish-your-reviews-initiative/\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n6. [28/4/25] Open Source Software\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Borisova, E., Abu Ahmad, R., Garcia-Castro, L., Usbeck, R., \u0026 Rehm, G. (2024). Surveying the FAIRness of Annotation Tools: Difficult to find, difficult to reuse. Proceedings of The 18th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (LAW-XVIII), 29–45. https://aclanthology.org/2024.law-1.4/\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/06.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Abramatic, J.-F., Di Cosmo, R., \u0026 Zacchiroli, S. (2018). Building the universal archive of source code. Communications of the ACM, 61(10), 29–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3183558\n     * Alliez, P., Cosmo, R. D., Guedj, B., Girault, A., Hacid, M.-S., Legrand, A., \u0026 Rougier, N. (2020). Attributing and Referencing (Research) Software: Best Practices and Outlook From Inria. Computing in Science \u0026 Engineering, 22(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2019.2949413\n     * Cohen, J., Katz, D. S., Barker, M., Chue Hong, N., Haines, R., \u0026 Jay, C. (2021). The Four Pillars of Research Software Engineering. IEEE Software, 38(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2020.2973362\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Nuvolari, A. (2005). Open source software development: Some historical perspectives. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v10i10.1284\n     * Open Source Initiative. (2007, March 22). The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osd\n     * Prlić, A., \u0026 Procter, J. B. (2012). Ten Simple Rules for the Open Development of Scientific Software. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(12), e1002802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002802\n     * Raymond, E. S. (2000). The cathedral and the bazaar: Musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary (Version 3.0). O’Reilly Media. http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/\n     * Smith, A. M., Katz, D. S., Niemeyer, K. E., \u0026 FORCE11 Software Citation Working Group. (2016). Software citation principles. PeerJ Computer Science, 2, e86. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.86\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n7. [5/5/25] Open Access\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Hyde, A. (2025). PRC vs The Cathedral: How PRC Might Change Publishing (Version 1). https://www.robotscooking.com/content/files/2025/01/PRC-vs-The-Cathedral_V1.pdf \n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/07.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Bosman, J., Frantsvåg, J. E., Kramer, B., Langlais, P.-C., \u0026 Proudman, V. (2021). OA Diamond Journals Study. Part 1: Findings. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4558704\n     * Brainard, J. (2021). Open access takes flight. Science, 371(6524), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.371.6524.16\n     * Fyfe, A. (2021). Self-help for learned journals: Scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s. History of Science, 007327532199990. https://doi.org/10.1177/0073275321999901\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Logan, C. J. (2017). We can shift academic culture through publishing choices. F1000Research, 6, 518. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11415.2\n     * Piwowar, H., Priem, J., Larivière, V., Alperin, J. P., Matthias, L., Norlander, B., Farley, A., West, J., \u0026 Haustein, S. (2018). The state of OA: A large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ, 6, e4375. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375\n     * Tennant, J. (2018). What do penguins, Gimli, and cobras have to do with Open Science? DARIAH Annual Event 2018, Paris, France. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.6326339.V1\n     * Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, T., Davila, J., Enkhbayar, A., Havemann, J., Kramer, B., Martin, R., Masuzzo, P., Nobes, A., Rice, C., Rivera-López, B., Ross-Hellauer, T., Sattler, S., Thacker, P. D., \u0026 Vanholsbeeck, M. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications, 7(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034\n     * Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., \u0026 Hartgerink, Chris. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n8. [8/5/25] Open Metrics\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Ma, L. (2022). Metrics and epistemic injustice. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-12-2021-0240\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/08.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Artrake Studio (Director). (2020, June). What can DNA test really tell us about our ancestry? [Video recording]. https://www.ted.com/talks/prosanta_chakrabarty_what_can_dna_tests_really_tell_us_about_our_ancestry\n     * Barcelona Declaration on Open Research Information. (2024). [Policy]. https://barcelona-declaration.org/\n     * Cameron, R. D. (1997). A Universal Citation Database. First Monday, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v2i4.522\n     * Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment. (2022). Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment [Policy]. European Science Foundation. https://coara.eu/agreement/the-agreement-full-text/\n     * Garfield, E. (1955). Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108\n     * Garfield, E. (2006). The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor. JAMA, 295(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Tennant, J. P., Crane, H., Crick, T., Davila, J., Enkhbayar, A., Havemann, J., Kramer, B., Martin, R., Masuzzo, P., Nobes, A., Rice, C., Rivera-López, B., Ross-Hellauer, T., Sattler, S., Thacker, P. D., \u0026 Vanholsbeeck, M. (2019). Ten Hot Topics around Scholarly Publishing. Publications, 7(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7020034\n     * Waltman, L. (2020, September 9). Responsible research assessment requires open scholarly metadata. Workshop on Open Citations and Open Scholarly Metadata 2020, Bologna, Italy. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4021492\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n9. [12/5/25] Open Infrastructures\n   * Mandatory reading (to read and study before the lecture):\n     * Goudarzi, S., \u0026 Dunks, R. (2023). Defining Open Scholarly Infrastructure: A Review of Relevant Literature (Version 2). Invest in Open Infrastructure. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8064102\n   * Theoretical part: [slide](https://open-sci.github.io/2024-2025/slides/09.pdf)\n   * Supplementary bibliography (optional):\n     * Bilder, G., Lin, J., \u0026 Neylon, C. (2023, November). The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure. The Principles of Open Scholarly Infrastructure. https://doi.org/10.24343/C34W2H\n     * EOSC Association. (2025). EOSC Federation Handbook (Handbook Version 1). EOSC Association. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14999577\n     * Ficarra, V., Fosci, M., Chiarelli, A., Kramer, B., \u0026 Proudman, V. (2020). Scoping the Open Science Infrastructure Landscape in Europe. SPARC Europe. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4159838\n     * Janssen, R., Gramsbergen, E., de Smaele, M., Teperek, M., \u0026 Popescu, I. (2023, January 30). We are going free and open source! [Blog]. 4TU.ResearchData Community. https://community.data.4tu.nl/2023/01/30/we-are-going-free-and-open-source/\n     * Kramer, B., \u0026 Bosman, J. (2015, June 18). The good, the efficient and the open—Changing research workflows and the need to move from Open Access to Open Science. CERN Workshop on Innovations in Scholarly Communication (OAI9), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.slideshare.net/bmkramer/the-good-the-efficient-and-the-open-oai9\n     * Teal, T., Lowenberg, D., Smith, T., Gonzales, J. B., Nielsen, L. H., \u0026 Ioannidis, A. (2020, August 26). Sustainable, Open Source Alternatives Exist [Blog]. Dryad News and Views. https://blog.datadryad.org/2020/08/26/sustainable-infrastructure-exists/\n     * Teperek, M., \u0026 Dunning, A. (2020, August 18). Why figshare? Choosing a new technical infrastructure for 4TU.ResearchData [Blog]. Open Working. https://openworking.wordpress.com/2020/08/18/why-figshare-choosing-a-new-technical-infrastructure-for-4tu-researchdata/\n   \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n10. [15/5/25] Wrap-up session \n    \u003chr\u003e\u003c/hr\u003e\n\n11. [27/6/25] Workshop\n    * Where: Aula Pascoli, Department of Classical Philology and Italian Studies, University of Bologna, via Zamboni 32, 40126 Bologna (BO)\n    * Agenda:\n      * 11:00-11:15: Welcoming, instructions, setting up\n      * 11:15-11:45: Project presentation\n      * 11:45-12:25: Q\u0026A\n      * 12:25-12:30: Closing\n\n\n### Extras\n\nVideo presentations about Open Science stuff:\n* Tennant, J. (2018, May 23). Open Science is just good science. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEEcwRUgQu8\n* Suber, P. (2021, April 14). Let’s talk about...Open Science Infrastructure with Peter Suber (A. Morka, Interviewer) [Youtube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwSoFKFCjic\n* Thaney, K. (2021, April 23). Let’s talk about... Open Science Infrastructure with Kaitlin Thaney (A. Morka, Interviewer) [Youtube]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kFk2hbtwmqU\n\n\n### Schedule\n\n\u003ctable\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e31/3/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e13:00-16:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eIntroduction to Open Science\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e3/4/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eReproducibility\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e7/4/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e13:00-16:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eFAIR and Open Data\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e10/4/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Methodology\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e14/4/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e13:00-16:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Peer Review\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e28/4/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e13:00-16:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Source Software\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e5/5/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e13:00-16:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Access\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e8/5/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Metrics\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12/5/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e13:00-16:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eOpen Infrastructures\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e15/5/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e12:00-15:00\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eWrap-up session\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n  \u003ctr\u003e\u003ctd\u003e27/6/25\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003e11:00-12:30\u003c/td\u003e\u003ctd\u003eWorkshop\u003c/td\u003e\u003c/tr\u003e\n\u003c/table\u003e\n","project_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fopen-sci%2F2024-2025","html_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/projects/github.com%2Fopen-sci%2F2024-2025","lists_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fopen-sci%2F2024-2025/lists"}