{"id":51197933,"url":"https://github.com/samuraiwriter7/space-commons-coordination-protocol","last_synced_at":"2026-06-27T22:03:04.426Z","repository":{"id":365350793,"uuid":"1271715465","full_name":"SamuraiWriter7/space-commons-coordination-protocol","owner":"SamuraiWriter7","description":"A Nakayoshi Network for peaceful AI-assisted space coordination.","archived":false,"fork":false,"pushed_at":"2026-06-17T02:03:41.000Z","size":42,"stargazers_count":0,"open_issues_count":0,"forks_count":0,"subscribers_count":0,"default_branch":"main","last_synced_at":"2026-06-17T02:15:54.983Z","etag":null,"topics":["ai-safety","coordination-protocol","de-escalation","nakayoshi-network","peaceful-space","responsible-ai","space-commons","space-debris","space-governance","space-safety","space-situational-awareness"],"latest_commit_sha":null,"homepage":"","language":"Python","has_issues":true,"has_wiki":null,"has_pages":null,"mirror_url":null,"source_name":null,"license":"mit","status":null,"scm":"git","pull_requests_enabled":true,"icon_url":"https://github.com/SamuraiWriter7.png","metadata":{"files":{"readme":"README.md","changelog":"CHANGELOG.md","contributing":null,"funding":null,"license":"LICENSE","code_of_conduct":null,"threat_model":null,"audit":null,"citation":null,"codeowners":null,"security":null,"support":null,"governance":null,"roadmap":null,"authors":null,"dei":null,"publiccode":null,"codemeta":null,"zenodo":null,"notice":null,"maintainers":null,"copyright":null,"agents":null,"dco":null,"cla":null}},"created_at":"2026-06-17T00:19:11.000Z","updated_at":"2026-06-17T02:01:57.000Z","dependencies_parsed_at":null,"dependency_job_id":null,"html_url":"https://github.com/SamuraiWriter7/space-commons-coordination-protocol","commit_stats":null,"previous_names":["samuraiwriter7/space-commons-coordination-protocol"],"tags_count":3,"template":false,"template_full_name":null,"purl":"pkg:github/SamuraiWriter7/space-commons-coordination-protocol","repository_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol","tags_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol/tags","releases_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol/releases","manifests_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol/manifests","owner_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners/SamuraiWriter7","download_url":"https://codeload.github.com/SamuraiWriter7/space-commons-coordination-protocol/tar.gz/refs/heads/main","sbom_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol/sbom","scorecard":null,"host":{"name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com","kind":"github","repositories_count":286080680,"owners_count":34869004,"icon_url":"https://github.com/github.png","version":null,"created_at":"2022-05-30T11:31:42.601Z","updated_at":"2026-05-26T15:22:16.424Z","status":"online","status_checked_at":"2026-06-27T02:00:06.362Z","response_time":126,"last_error":null,"robots_txt_status":"success","robots_txt_updated_at":"2025-07-24T06:49:26.215Z","robots_txt_url":"https://github.com/robots.txt","online":true,"can_crawl_api":true,"host_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub","repositories_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories","repository_names_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repository_names","owners_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners"}},"keywords":["ai-safety","coordination-protocol","de-escalation","nakayoshi-network","peaceful-space","responsible-ai","space-commons","space-debris","space-governance","space-safety","space-situational-awareness"],"created_at":"2026-06-27T22:03:03.159Z","updated_at":"2026-06-27T22:03:04.419Z","avatar_url":"https://github.com/SamuraiWriter7.png","language":"Python","funding_links":[],"categories":[],"sub_categories":[],"readme":"# Space Commons Coordination Protocol\n\n**A Nakayoshi Network for peaceful, AI-assisted space coordination.**\n\nSpace Commons Coordination Protocol (SCCP) is a lightweight coordination protocol for preserving outer space as a shared operational environment.\n\nIt is designed to support peaceful, transparent, AI-assisted coordination for space safety events such as collision risk, debris warnings, AI false-positive reviews, communication anomalies, space weather alerts, emergency coordination, and debris-related responsibility records.\n\nSCCP does not define a military command structure.\n\nIt defines a coordination, verification, traceability, audit, responsibility, remediation, and de-escalation layer for preventing misunderstanding, misclassification, premature escalation, and unnecessary hostility in space operations.\n\n---\n\n## Manifest\n\nSpace should not become a place where AI accelerates misunderstanding into conflict.\n\nSCCP begins from a simple premise:\n\nAI should not be used to automate hostility in space.\nAI should be used to help humans see, verify, pause, coordinate, audit, and repair.\n\nThe protocol defines machine-readable structures for:\n\n* recording space safety events\n* aggregating observations\n* verifying multiple sources\n* preventing AI false positives\n* auditing AI misclassification\n* requiring human review before escalation\n* preserving audit logs\n* documenting debris-related responsibility\n* recording mitigation and remediation contributions\n* maintaining a de-escalation-first posture\n\nThe public name is:\n\n**Space Commons Coordination Protocol**\n\nThe internal nickname is:\n\n**Nakayoshi Network**\n\nThe formal name gives the protocol diplomatic and technical clarity.\nThe nickname preserves its design spirit:\n\n* coordination before command\n* trace before retaliation\n* audit before attribution\n* mitigation before blame\n* human review before escalation\n* commons before sovereignty\n\nBefore bringing swords into orbit, establish orbital etiquette.\n\n---\n\n## Why This Matters Now\n\nOuter space is becoming more crowded, automated, commercialized, and strategically sensitive.\n\nAs satellites, autonomous systems, commercial operators, military systems, and AI-assisted monitoring tools increase, the risk of misunderstanding also increases.\n\nA communication anomaly may be misread as interference.\nA debris event may be misread as hostile action.\nAn AI anomaly score may be over-classified.\nA single-source observation may be interpreted too quickly.\nA debris origin estimate may be treated as attribution before review.\nA public warning may accidentally escalate a sensitive situation.\n\nSCCP exists to prevent this conversion:\n\n```text\nuncertainty\n  → suspicion\n  → attribution\n  → escalation\n```\n\nInstead, SCCP proposes another path:\n\n```text\nobservation\n  → trace\n  → verification\n  → audit\n  → human review\n  → coordination\n  → mitigation\n  → remediation\n```\n\nThe goal is not to deny security risks.\n\nThe goal is to prevent uncertainty from becoming hostility before evidence, review, and mitigation are complete.\n\n---\n\n## Core Principles\n\n### Defense without Hostility\n\nSCCP treats safety, continuity, and shared-space preservation as the first priority.\n\nIt does not treat uncertainty as hostility.\n\n### Coordination before Command\n\nSCCP is not a command system.\n\nIt is a coordination layer for observation sharing, source verification, review, audit, and de-escalation.\n\n### Trace before Retaliation\n\nEvery escalation-sensitive event should include trace information before attribution, retaliation, or public interpretation is considered.\n\n### Audit before Attribution\n\nAI-generated classifications, object correlations, risk labels, and origin assessments must be auditable.\n\nAI must not finalize hostile attribution.\n\n### Human Review before Escalation\n\nAI may assist with classification, anomaly detection, uncertainty estimation, notification prioritization, audit preparation, and public summary drafting.\n\nAI must not make final hostile attribution, liability, retaliation, or escalation decisions.\n\n### Mitigation before Blame\n\nDebris-related events should first trigger risk reduction, operator notification, monitoring, and remediation planning.\n\nSCCP does not automatically assign legal liability.\n\n### Commons before Sovereignty\n\nSCCP begins from the assumption that outer space is a shared operational environment.\n\nProtection of the shared orbital environment comes before unilateral reaction.\n\n---\n\n## Architecture\n\nSCCP is currently organized into five protocol layers.\n\n```text\n[ Space Event ]\n      ↓\n[ v0.1 Space Friendship Event ]\n      ↓\n[ v0.2 Neutral Coordination Node ]\n      ↓\n[ v0.3 De-escalation Workflow ]\n      ↓\n[ v0.4 AI Misclassification Audit ]\n      ↓\n[ v0.5 Space Debris Responsibility Record ]\n      ↓\n[ Human Review / Operator Notification / Mitigation / Remediation / Continued Monitoring ]\n```\n\n### v0.1 — Space Friendship Event\n\nRecords the event.\n\nThis layer defines the minimum event format for peaceful AI-assisted space safety coordination.\n\nIt supports:\n\n* collision risk\n* debris warning\n* AI false-positive review\n* communication anomaly\n* space weather alert\n* emergency coordination\n\n### v0.2 — Neutral Coordination Node\n\nReceives and reviews the event.\n\nThis layer defines a non-command coordination node for:\n\n* observation aggregation\n* cross-source verification\n* de-escalation review\n* AI false-positive checking\n* operator notification\n* public summary preparation\n* audit log preservation\n\n### v0.3 — De-escalation Workflow\n\nPrevents premature escalation.\n\nThis layer defines a step-by-step workflow for moving from uncertainty to verification, review, notification, and resolution.\n\nIt is not an automated retaliation chain.\n\n### v0.4 — AI Misclassification Audit\n\nAudits AI-generated classifications.\n\nThis layer reviews false positives, over-classification, under-classification, misleading confidence, context loss, data quality errors, evidence mismatch, model bias, and escalation-sensitive public summaries.\n\nIt asks:\n\nDid AI classify the event correctly, or did it create unnecessary escalation risk?\n\n### v0.5 — Space Debris Responsibility Record\n\nDocuments debris-related responsibility and remediation.\n\nThis layer records debris-related events, uncertainty, mitigation actions, remediation contributions, public disclosure boundaries, human review, and recurrence prevention.\n\nIt is not an automatic liability engine.\n\n---\n\n## Protocol Layers\n\n## v0.1 — Space Friendship Event\n\nThe Space Friendship Event layer defines the minimum event structure for peaceful AI-assisted space coordination.\n\nA Space Friendship Event records:\n\n* event identity\n* event type\n* severity\n* affected objects\n* observation sources\n* AI assistance status\n* trace information\n* coordination status\n* human review status\n* safety boundaries\n\nExample event types:\n\n```text\ncollision_risk\ndebris_warning\nai_false_positive_review\ncommunication_anomaly\nspace_weather_alert\nemergency_coordination\n```\n\nIncluded files:\n\n```text\ndocs/space-friendship-event.md\nschemas/space-friendship-event.schema.json\nexamples/collision-risk-event.example.yaml\nexamples/debris-warning-event.example.yaml\nexamples/ai-false-positive-review.example.yaml\n```\n\n---\n\n## v0.2 — Neutral Coordination Node\n\nThe Neutral Coordination Node layer defines the first operational coordination structure for processing Space Friendship Events.\n\nA Neutral Coordination Node is not a command node.\n\nIt receives events, aggregates observations, verifies multiple sources, prevents AI false positives, preserves audit logs, and routes sensitive cases to human review.\n\nA Neutral Coordination Node may:\n\n* receive Space Friendship Events\n* aggregate observations\n* compare multiple sources\n* detect inconsistent evidence\n* flag AI false positives\n* notify relevant operators\n* prepare non-sensitive summaries\n* route sensitive cases to human review\n\nA Neutral Coordination Node must not:\n\n* select targets\n* authorize retaliation\n* recommend weapon use\n* finalize hostile attribution by AI\n* create automatic escalation chains\n* override human review\n\nIncluded files:\n\n```text\ndocs/neutral-coordination-node.md\nschemas/neutral-coordination-node.schema.json\nexamples/neutral-coordination-node.example.yaml\n```\n\n---\n\n## v0.3 — De-escalation Workflow\n\nThe De-escalation Workflow layer connects Space Friendship Events and Neutral Coordination Nodes into a step-by-step safety process.\n\nIt defines:\n\n* event recording\n* observation collection\n* cross-source verification\n* AI false-positive checking\n* neutral node review\n* human review\n* operator notification\n* public summary review\n* resolution or continued monitoring\n\nThe default posture is de-escalation.\n\nWhen evidence is uncertain, disputed, or incomplete, the workflow requires additional verification and human review before escalation-sensitive interpretation.\n\nA standard workflow may follow this sequence:\n\n```text\nrecord_event\n  ↓\ncollect_observations\n  ↓\ncross_source_verification\n  ↓\nai_false_positive_check\n  ↓\nneutral_node_review\n  ↓\nhuman_review\n  ↓\noperator_notification\n  ↓\npublic_summary_review\n  ↓\nresolve_or_monitor\n```\n\nIncluded files:\n\n```text\ndocs/de-escalation-workflow.md\nschemas/de-escalation-workflow.schema.json\nexamples/de-escalation-workflow.example.yaml\n```\n\n---\n\n## v0.4 — AI Misclassification Audit\n\nThe AI Misclassification Audit layer defines a review structure for AI-generated classifications in space safety coordination.\n\nIt is designed to prevent:\n\n* false positives\n* over-classification\n* under-classification\n* misleading confidence\n* context loss\n* data quality errors\n* evidence mismatch\n* model bias\n* public summary errors\n* escalation-sensitive language\n\nThis layer asks a simple question:\n\nDid AI classify the event correctly, or did it create unnecessary escalation risk?\n\nThe audit may produce correction actions such as:\n\n* withdraw false positive\n* reclassify event\n* update confidence\n* request additional sources\n* notify operator\n* update public summary\n* block escalation\n* record recurrence rule\n\nAI Misclassification Audit is not a blame engine.\n\nIt is a safety audit layer for preventing AI-generated uncertainty from becoming hostility.\n\nIncluded files:\n\n```text\ndocs/ai-misclassification-audit.md\nschemas/ai-misclassification-audit.schema.json\nexamples/ai-misclassification-audit.example.yaml\n```\n\n---\n\n## v0.5 — Space Debris Responsibility Record\n\nThe Space Debris Responsibility Record layer defines a traceable structure for documenting debris-related events, uncertainty, mitigation actions, remediation contributions, and public accountability.\n\nIt is not an automatic liability engine.\n\nIt is designed to preserve reviewable debris-related responsibility without converting uncertainty into hostility.\n\nThis layer records:\n\n* debris event identity\n* linked Space Friendship Event\n* linked De-escalation Workflow\n* linked AI Misclassification Audit\n* affected objects or orbital regions\n* debris origin assessment\n* uncertainty level\n* responsibility status\n* mitigation actions\n* remediation contributions\n* public disclosure status\n* human review\n* recurrence prevention\n\nThe key boundary is:\n\nBefore blame, trace.\nBefore attribution, review.\nBefore punishment, mitigation.\nBefore escalation, remediation.\n\nIncluded files:\n\n```text\ndocs/space-debris-responsibility-record.md\nschemas/space-debris-responsibility-record.schema.json\nexamples/space-debris-responsibility-record.example.yaml\n```\n\n---\n\n## Civilizational Positioning\n\nSCCP is positioned as a thin coordination OS for preserving outer space as a shared commons.\n\nIt is not a military command structure.\n\nIt is a coordination, verification, traceability, audit, de-escalation, responsibility, and remediation layer for peaceful AI-assisted space safety.\n\nSCCP is also a precondition layer for any responsible space defense architecture that may emerge in the future.\n\nThe protocol begins from the commons.\n\nIt reframes defense as the preservation of shared conditions:\n\n* shared awareness\n* traceable evidence\n* AI restraint\n* AI auditability\n* human review\n* non-escalation\n* mitigation\n* remediation\n* mutual survivability\n\nSee:\n\n```text\ndocs/civilizational-positioning.md\n```\n\n---\n\n## Safety Boundary\n\n| Action                                       | SCCP Position |\n| -------------------------------------------- | ------------- |\n| Target selection                             | Prohibited    |\n| Automatic retaliation                        | Prohibited    |\n| Weapon-use recommendation                    | Prohibited    |\n| Final hostile attribution by AI              | Prohibited    |\n| Final debris attribution by AI               | Prohibited    |\n| Automatic liability assignment               | Prohibited    |\n| Escalation without human review              | Prohibited    |\n| Public leakage of sensitive operational data | Prohibited    |\n| Human-reviewed safety coordination           | Allowed       |\n| Risk classification                          | Allowed       |\n| Trajectory uncertainty estimation            | Allowed       |\n| False-positive review                        | Allowed       |\n| AI misclassification audit preparation       | Allowed       |\n| Public non-sensitive summary drafting        | Allowed       |\n| Debris mitigation record                     | Allowed       |\n| Remediation contribution record              | Allowed       |\n\nThe key principle is simple:\n\nAI may assist coordination.\nAI must not automate hostility.\n\n---\n\n## AI Use Boundary\n\nAI may be used for:\n\n* risk classification\n* trajectory uncertainty estimation\n* anomaly detection\n* data consistency checking\n* notification priority ranking\n* false-positive review\n* public summary drafting\n* object correlation support\n* debris risk estimation\n* audit preparation\n* recurrence rule drafting\n\nAI must not be used for:\n\n* target selection\n* automatic retaliation\n* weapon-use recommendation\n* final hostile attribution\n* final responsibility attribution\n* automatic liability assignment\n* escalation without human review\n\n---\n\n## Debris Responsibility Boundary\n\nThe Space Debris Responsibility Record does not automatically assign legal liability.\n\nIt may record:\n\n* origin status\n* evidence status\n* uncertainty level\n* responsibility review status\n* mitigation actions\n* remediation contributions\n* public disclosure level\n* human review notes\n\nIt must not:\n\n* make final attribution by AI\n* trigger retaliation\n* leak sensitive operational data\n* replace legal processes\n* convert uncertainty into blame\n\nThe default posture is:\n\n```text\ntrace\n  → review\n  → mitigation\n  → remediation\n  → recurrence prevention\n```\n\n---\n\n## Repository Structure\n\n```text\n.\n├── README.md\n├── CHANGELOG.md\n├── docs/\n│   ├── civilizational-positioning.md\n│   ├── space-friendship-event.md\n│   ├── neutral-coordination-node.md\n│   ├── de-escalation-workflow.md\n│   ├── ai-misclassification-audit.md\n│   └── space-debris-responsibility-record.md\n├── schemas/\n│   ├── space-friendship-event.schema.json\n│   ├── neutral-coordination-node.schema.json\n│   ├── de-escalation-workflow.schema.json\n│   ├── ai-misclassification-audit.schema.json\n│   └── space-debris-responsibility-record.schema.json\n├── examples/\n│   ├── collision-risk-event.example.yaml\n│   ├── debris-warning-event.example.yaml\n│   ├── ai-false-positive-review.example.yaml\n│   ├── neutral-coordination-node.example.yaml\n│   ├── de-escalation-workflow.example.yaml\n│   ├── ai-misclassification-audit.example.yaml\n│   └── space-debris-responsibility-record.example.yaml\n└── scripts/\n    └── validate_examples.py\n```\n\n---\n\n## Validation\n\nInstall dependencies:\n\n```bash\npip install jsonschema pyyaml\n```\n\nRun validation:\n\n```bash\npython scripts/validate_examples.py\n```\n\nExpected validation targets:\n\n```text\nSpace Friendship Event\nNeutral Coordination Node\nDe-escalation Workflow\nAI Misclassification Audit\nSpace Debris Responsibility Record\n```\n\nExpected result:\n\n```text\n[ok] collision-risk-event.example.yaml is valid\n[ok] debris-warning-event.example.yaml is valid\n[ok] ai-false-positive-review.example.yaml is valid\n[ok] neutral-coordination-node.example.yaml is valid\n[ok] de-escalation-workflow.example.yaml is valid\n[ok] ai-misclassification-audit.example.yaml is valid\n[ok] space-debris-responsibility-record.example.yaml is valid\n```\n\n---\n\n## GitHub Actions\n\nRecommended workflow:\n\n```text\n.github/workflows/validate-examples.yml\n```\n\nThe workflow should:\n\n* check out the repository\n* set up Python\n* install `jsonschema` and `pyyaml`\n* run `python scripts/validate_examples.py`\n\n---\n\n## Status\n\nCurrent candidate:\n\n```text\nv0.5.0-candidate — Space Debris Responsibility Record\n```\n\nImplemented layers:\n\n```text\nv0.1 — Space Friendship Event\nv0.2 — Neutral Coordination Node\nv0.3 — De-escalation Workflow\nv0.4 — AI Misclassification Audit\nv0.5 — Space Debris Responsibility Record\n```\n\n---\n\n## Roadmap\n\n### v0.6 — SSA Interoperability Layer\n\nA future layer for aligning SCCP records with space situational awareness systems and external observation networks.\n\nPossible scope:\n\n* observation source mapping\n* conjunction warning interoperability\n* object reference normalization\n* public/private data tiers\n* operator notification interfaces\n* neutral coordination data exchange\n\n### v0.7 — Nakayoshi Certification\n\nA future layer for certifying participants that comply with SCCP safety boundaries.\n\nPossible scope:\n\n* no automatic retaliation\n* no final hostile attribution by AI\n* human review required\n* public non-sensitive summary policy\n* audit log retention\n* debris mitigation participation\n* AI misclassification audit readiness\n\n### v0.8 — Space AI Responsibility Model\n\nA future layer for defining responsibility boundaries for AI-assisted space coordination.\n\nPossible scope:\n\n* AI role declaration\n* model confidence audit\n* human override record\n* misclassification recurrence tracking\n* accountability handoff\n* public explanation boundary\n\n### Future Extensions\n\nPossible future extensions include:\n\n* Optional Defense Coordination Module with strict human oversight\n* Space Debris Remediation Contribution Ledger\n* Trace and Royalty OS integration\n* Contribution-based governance systems\n* Space Commons public registry\n* Multi-stakeholder neutral node federation\n\nAny future defense-related extension should remain:\n\n* opt-in\n* reviewable\n* auditable\n* human-supervised\n* non-retaliatory by default\n* subordinate to SCCP safety boundaries\n\n---\n\n## Design Boundary\n\nSCCP is not:\n\n* a military alliance\n* a command-and-control system\n* a weapons coordination protocol\n* an automated retaliation framework\n* an automatic liability engine\n* a replacement for international law\n* a final governance regime for outer space\n\nSCCP is:\n\n* a coordination protocol\n* a traceability layer\n* a de-escalation mechanism\n* an AI use boundary model\n* an AI audit layer\n* a debris responsibility record\n* a remediation contribution log\n* a human-review-first safety structure\n* a lightweight commons-preserving OS\n\n---\n\n## Core Statement\n\nSpace should not become a place where AI accelerates misunderstanding into conflict.\n\nSpace should become a place where AI helps humanity see, verify, pause, coordinate, audit, mitigate, and repair.\n\nBefore command, coordination.\n\nBefore retaliation, trace.\n\nBefore attribution, audit.\n\nBefore escalation, human review.\n\nBefore blame, mitigation.\n\nBefore punishment, remediation.\n\nBefore sovereignty, commons.\n\nBefore bringing swords into orbit, establish orbital etiquette.\n","project_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fsamuraiwriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol","html_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/projects/github.com%2Fsamuraiwriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol","lists_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fsamuraiwriter7%2Fspace-commons-coordination-protocol/lists"}