{"id":51197834,"url":"https://github.com/samuraiwriter7/synchronization-audit-protocol","last_synced_at":"2026-06-27T22:02:38.932Z","repository":{"id":366030743,"uuid":"1274812673","full_name":"SamuraiWriter7/synchronization-audit-protocol","owner":"SamuraiWriter7","description":"A minimal audit protocol for recording and classifying observed similarities between ideas, documents, systems, protocols, public events, or AI-generated interpretations.","archived":false,"fork":false,"pushed_at":"2026-06-20T00:40:58.000Z","size":90,"stargazers_count":0,"open_issues_count":0,"forks_count":0,"subscribers_count":0,"default_branch":"main","last_synced_at":"2026-06-20T01:12:42.145Z","etag":null,"topics":["ai-governance","ai-safety","ai-transparency","audit-protocol","civilization-os","origin-tracing","similarity-detection","similarity-detection-human-review","structure-fingerprint","synchronization-audition","trace-receipt","traceability"],"latest_commit_sha":null,"homepage":"","language":"Python","has_issues":true,"has_wiki":null,"has_pages":null,"mirror_url":null,"source_name":null,"license":"mit","status":null,"scm":"git","pull_requests_enabled":true,"icon_url":"https://github.com/SamuraiWriter7.png","metadata":{"files":{"readme":"README.md","changelog":"CHANGELOG.md","contributing":null,"funding":null,"license":"LICENSE","code_of_conduct":null,"threat_model":null,"audit":null,"citation":null,"codeowners":null,"security":null,"support":null,"governance":null,"roadmap":null,"authors":null,"dei":null,"publiccode":null,"codemeta":null,"zenodo":null,"notice":null,"maintainers":null,"copyright":null,"agents":null,"dco":null,"cla":null}},"created_at":"2026-06-19T23:22:06.000Z","updated_at":"2026-06-20T00:46:29.000Z","dependencies_parsed_at":null,"dependency_job_id":null,"html_url":"https://github.com/SamuraiWriter7/synchronization-audit-protocol","commit_stats":null,"previous_names":["samuraiwriter7/synchronization-audit-protocol"],"tags_count":5,"template":false,"template_full_name":null,"purl":"pkg:github/SamuraiWriter7/synchronization-audit-protocol","repository_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol","tags_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol/tags","releases_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol/releases","manifests_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol/manifests","owner_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners/SamuraiWriter7","download_url":"https://codeload.github.com/SamuraiWriter7/synchronization-audit-protocol/tar.gz/refs/heads/main","sbom_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories/SamuraiWriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol/sbom","scorecard":null,"host":{"name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com","kind":"github","repositories_count":286080680,"owners_count":34869004,"icon_url":"https://github.com/github.png","version":null,"created_at":"2022-05-30T11:31:42.601Z","updated_at":"2026-05-26T15:22:16.424Z","status":"online","status_checked_at":"2026-06-27T02:00:06.362Z","response_time":126,"last_error":null,"robots_txt_status":"success","robots_txt_updated_at":"2025-07-24T06:49:26.215Z","robots_txt_url":"https://github.com/robots.txt","online":true,"can_crawl_api":true,"host_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub","repositories_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repositories","repository_names_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/repository_names","owners_url":"https://repos.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/hosts/GitHub/owners"}},"keywords":["ai-governance","ai-safety","ai-transparency","audit-protocol","civilization-os","origin-tracing","similarity-detection","similarity-detection-human-review","structure-fingerprint","synchronization-audition","trace-receipt","traceability"],"created_at":"2026-06-27T22:02:38.121Z","updated_at":"2026-06-27T22:02:38.931Z","avatar_url":"https://github.com/SamuraiWriter7.png","language":"Python","funding_links":[],"categories":[],"sub_categories":[],"readme":"# Synchronization Audit Protocol\n\nA minimal audit protocol for recording and classifying observed similarities between ideas, documents, systems, protocols, public events, or AI-generated interpretations.\n\nThis protocol does not assume that similarity proves influence.\n\nIt provides a minimal audit structure for classifying observed similarities between ideas, documents, systems, protocols, public events, or AI-generated interpretations.\n\nThe purpose is to distinguish coincidence, structural convergence, indirect influence, direct reference, and AI-side reconstruction without collapsing them into a vague notion of “synchronization.”\n\n## Purpose\n\nThe Synchronization Audit Protocol exists to slow down premature interpretation.\n\nWhen two structures appear similar, it is tempting to immediately assume influence, imitation, theft, resonance, or hidden synchronization. This protocol avoids that shortcut.\n\nInstead, it asks:\n\n- Which structure appeared first?\n- Are the vocabularies actually similar?\n- Is the structural order similar?\n- Are unique metaphors reused?\n- Is there any reference path?\n- Was the source publicly accessible?\n- Could an AI system have reconstructed the similarity?\n- Could independent constraints explain the convergence?\n\nThe goal is not accusation.\n\nThe goal is evidence-based origin auditing.\n\n## Classification Model\n\nThe protocol uses five fixed classifications.\n\n| Code | Label | Meaning |\n|---|---|---|\n| A | `accidental_sync` | Similarity appears coincidental or too weak to support a stronger claim. |\n| B | `structural_convergence` | Similarity is likely caused by shared constraints, timing, environment, or common structural pressures. |\n| C | `indirect_influence` | Influence is plausible through public availability, diffusion, shared discourse, or intermediary systems, but no direct reference is proven. |\n| D | `direct_reference_or_imitation` | Direct reference, copying, imitation, citation, or derivation is supported by evidence. |\n| E | `ai_reconstruction` | Similarity may have been reconstructed, amplified, or reassembled by an AI system from prior context, training exposure, retrieval, or prompt dependency. |\n\n## Evidence Matrix\n\nEach audit record includes the following evidence fields:\n\n| Field | Purpose |\n|---|---|\n| `timestamp_order` | Checks whether one structure clearly predates the other. |\n| `vocabulary_overlap` | Measures shared terminology. |\n| `structural_order_overlap` | Checks whether the sequence, hierarchy, or architecture is similar. |\n| `unique_metaphor_overlap` | Checks whether distinctive metaphors or symbolic frames overlap. |\n| `reference_path` | Records citations, links, backlinks, mentions, or access paths. |\n| `public_accessibility` | Records whether the source could have been accessed publicly. |\n| `ai_context_dependency` | Checks whether AI context, memory, retrieval, or reconstruction may have shaped the similarity. |\n| `independent_constraint_pressure` | Evaluates whether shared external constraints are enough to explain the similarity. |\n\n## Why Unique Metaphor and Structural Order Matter\n\nVocabulary overlap is weak evidence by itself.\n\nMany people may independently use terms like “AI infrastructure,” “data center,” “trace,” “memory,” or “governance.”\n\nHowever, overlap becomes stronger when two elements appear together:\n\n1. Unique metaphors\n2. Similar structural order\n\nFor example, if two systems share not only words but also the same sequence of concepts, the same layered architecture, and the same unusual metaphor, the audit weight increases.\n\nThis does not automatically prove influence.\n\nIt means the similarity deserves stronger trace review.\n\n## Repository Structure\n\n```text\n.\n├── README.md\n├── CHANGELOG.md\n├── docs/\n│   └── synchronization-audit-protocol.md\n├── schemas/\n│   └── sync-audit-record.schema.json\n├── examples/\n│   └── sync-audit-record.example.yaml\n├── scripts/\n│   └── validate_examples.py\n└── .github/\n    └── workflows/\n        └── validate-examples.yml\nValidation\n\nInstall dependencies:\n\npip install jsonschema pyyaml\n\nRun validation:\n\npython scripts/validate_examples.py\n\nExpected result:\n\n[validate] Synchronization Audit Record\n  schema : schemas/sync-audit-record.schema.json\n  example: examples/sync-audit-record.example.yaml\n[ok] Synchronization Audit Record example is valid\nv0.1 Scope\n\nv0.1 places the audit ruler.\n\nIt does not yet attempt automated detection, legal judgment, attribution enforcement, or case-study expansion.\n\nThe focus is:\n\nfixed A–E classification\nminimal audit record schema\nevidence matrix\nconservative conclusion style\none calm example case\nRoadmap\nv0.1 = Place the audit ruler\nv0.2 = Add case studies\nv0.3 = Connect to Structure Fingerprint / Trace Layer\nv0.4 = Connect to Defense Court Protocol\nv0.5 = Add AI Agent Hook / automatic synchronization detection\nPrinciple\n\nSimilarity is not proof.\n\nSynchronization is not causality.\n\nA strong audit begins before excitement, accusation, or resonance.\n\nFirst calibrate the radar.\n\n\n## 6. `docs/synchronization-audit-protocol.md`\n\n```markdown\n# Synchronization Audit Protocol\n\n## 1. Overview\n\nThe Synchronization Audit Protocol is a minimal structure for recording observed similarities without prematurely converting them into claims of influence.\n\nIt is designed for cases where an idea, document, system, protocol, public event, or AI-generated interpretation appears to resemble another structure.\n\nThe protocol does not ask:\n\n\u003e “Is this copied?”\n\nIt first asks:\n\n\u003e “What kind of similarity is this, and what evidence supports that classification?”\n\n## 2. Core Principle\n\nSimilarity does not prove influence.\n\nTwo structures may resemble each other for many reasons:\n\n- coincidence\n- shared constraints\n- public discourse\n- indirect influence\n- direct reference\n- AI-side reconstruction\n- common source material\n- environmental pressure\n- historical timing\n\nThe protocol therefore separates observation from conclusion.\n\n## 3. Classification Model\n\n### A: Accidental Sync\n\nThe similarity is weak, generic, or plausibly coincidental.\n\nUse this classification when:\n\n- overlap is shallow\n- shared terms are common\n- structural order does not match\n- no unique metaphor is shared\n- no reference path exists\n\n### B: Structural Convergence\n\nThe similarity is best explained by shared constraints or environmental pressure.\n\nUse this classification when:\n\n- different actors face the same problem\n- physical, economic, technical, legal, or social pressures are similar\n- the same architecture emerges independently\n- no direct reference path is confirmed\n\nThis is the default classification for many infrastructure, AI, governance, and market patterns.\n\n### C: Indirect Influence\n\nInfluence is plausible but not directly proven.\n\nUse this classification when:\n\n- the source was publicly accessible\n- the target may have been exposed through discourse\n- similar vocabulary and structure appear\n- no direct citation or copying is confirmed\n\nThis classification preserves ambiguity.\n\n### D: Direct Reference or Imitation\n\nDirect reference, citation, imitation, copying, or derivation is supported by evidence.\n\nUse this classification only when trace evidence exists.\n\nExamples include:\n\n- explicit citation\n- link or backlink\n- copied text\n- reused diagram\n- matching unique metaphor and sequence\n- repository fork or derivative work\n- documented access path\n\nD should not be assigned based only on intuition.\n\n### E: AI Reconstruction\n\nThe similarity may have been reconstructed or amplified by an AI system.\n\nUse this classification when:\n\n- AI context is known to include the source\n- the output reproduces unusual structure without citation\n- prompt dependency is evident\n- retrieval or memory may have influenced the result\n- the AI collapses multiple sources into an unattributed reconstruction\n\nE does not necessarily imply malicious behavior.\n\nIt marks AI-side reconstruction risk.\n\n## 4. Evidence Matrix\n\nEach record contains eight evidence fields.\n\n### 4.1 timestamp_order\n\nRecords whether one structure clearly predates the other.\n\nTimestamp order is necessary but not sufficient.\n\nEarlier publication does not prove influence.\n\n### 4.2 vocabulary_overlap\n\nRecords shared terminology.\n\nVocabulary overlap is usually weak evidence unless the terms are rare, coined, or unusually combined.\n\n### 4.3 structural_order_overlap\n\nRecords whether the same conceptual sequence, hierarchy, or architecture appears.\n\nThis is stronger than vocabulary overlap.\n\n### 4.4 unique_metaphor_overlap\n\nRecords whether distinctive metaphors, symbolic frames, or unusual conceptual images overlap.\n\nThis can become strong evidence when combined with structural order overlap.\n\n### 4.5 reference_path\n\nRecords whether there is any known path of reference, citation, access, backlink, quotation, or documented exposure.\n\nThis is central for moving from convergence to influence.\n\n### 4.6 public_accessibility\n\nRecords whether the source was publicly available.\n\nPublic accessibility supports plausibility, but does not prove use.\n\n### 4.7 ai_context_dependency\n\nRecords whether an AI system may have reconstructed, summarized, or amplified the similarity.\n\nThis is important when outputs appear structurally close but lack citation.\n\n### 4.8 independent_constraint_pressure\n\nRecords whether independent external pressure can explain the similarity.\n\nStrong independent constraint pressure often supports B: structural convergence.\n\n## 5. Conclusion Style\n\nConclusions should avoid overclaiming.\n\nRecommended language:\n\n```text\nNo direct influence is proven.\nStructural convergence is likely.\nIndirect influence remains plausible.\nFurther trace evidence is required.\n\nAvoid language such as:\n\nThis proves copying.\nThis was definitely stolen.\nThey must have used the source.\n\nunless strong direct evidence exists.\n\n6. v0.1 Scope\n\nv0.1 only provides the audit ruler.\n\nIt includes:\n\none JSON Schema\none example record\none validation script\none GitHub Actions workflow\nthis protocol document\n\nIt does not include:\n\nautomated similarity detection\nlegal attribution review\nmachine-generated scoring\ncase-study archive\nintegration with other trace systems\n\nThose are reserved for later versions.\n\n7. Roadmap\nv0.1 = Place the audit ruler\nv0.2 = Add case studies\nv0.3 = Connect to Structure Fingerprint / Trace Layer\nv0.4 = Connect to Defense Court Protocol\nv0.5 = Add AI Agent Hook / automatic synchronization detection\n8. Final Principle\n\nResonance is valuable.\n\nBut resonance without audit becomes fog.\n\nThis protocol exists to keep the fog from pretending to be evidence.\n\n\n## 7. `CHANGELOG.md`\n\n```markdown\n# Changelog\n\nAll notable changes to this project will be documented in this file.\n\n## [v0.1.0-candidate] - 2026-06-20\n\n### Added\n\n- Added initial Synchronization Audit Protocol repository structure.\n- Added `sync-audit-record.schema.json`.\n- Added fixed A–E classification model:\n  - `A = accidental_sync`\n  - `B = structural_convergence`\n  - `C = indirect_influence`\n  - `D = direct_reference_or_imitation`\n  - `E = ai_reconstruction`\n- Added evidence matrix fields:\n  - `timestamp_order`\n  - `vocabulary_overlap`\n  - `structural_order_overlap`\n  - `unique_metaphor_overlap`\n  - `reference_path`\n  - `public_accessibility`\n  - `ai_context_dependency`\n  - `independent_constraint_pressure`\n- Added first example:\n  - `centralized_ai_backlash_memory_inflation`\n- Added Python validation script.\n- Added GitHub Actions workflow for example validation.\n- Added protocol documentation.\n\n### Notes\n\nv0.1 places the audit ruler before case-study expansion.\n\nThe purpose of this version is not to prove influence, imitation, or causality.\n\nThe purpose is to classify observed similarities with a conservative evidence structure.\n\n## v0.2 Case Study Layer\n\nv0.2 adds the Case Study Layer.\n\nv0.1 placed the audit ruler.\n\nv0.2 applies that ruler to multiple examples.\n\nThe purpose is not to accuse, prove imitation, or claim influence. The purpose is to test the A–E classification model against concrete similarity patterns.\n\n### Added Case Studies\n\n```text\ndocs/case-studies/\n├── centralized-ai-backlash-memory-inflation.md\n├── data-center-local-resistance.md\n└── ai-search-trace-origin-opacity.md\nAdded Example Records\nexamples/\n├── sync-audit-record.centralized-ai-backlash-memory-inflation.example.yaml\n├── sync-audit-record.data-center-local-resistance.example.yaml\n└── sync-audit-record.ai-search-trace-origin-opacity.example.yaml\nCase Study Discipline\n\nEach case study must preserve the distinction between:\n\nsimilarity\nconvergence\ninfluence\ndirect reference\nAI-side reconstruction\n\nNo case study should begin with an accusation.\n\nEvery case study should begin with an observed similarity and then classify it conservatively.\n\n## v0.3 Structure Fingerprint / Trace Layer\n\nv0.3 adds the Structure Fingerprint and Trace Layer Integration.\n\nv0.1 placed the audit ruler.\n\nv0.2 applied the ruler to case studies.\n\nv0.3 adds a comparison layer for recording structural features without treating them as proof.\n\n### Added Documents\n\n```text\ndocs/\n├── structure-fingerprint.md\n└── trace-layer-integration.md\nAdded Schema\nschemas/\n└── structure-fingerprint.schema.json\nAdded Example\nexamples/\n└── structure-fingerprint.example.yaml\nStructure Fingerprint\n\nA Structure Fingerprint records comparison features such as:\n\nvocabulary signature\nstructural sequence\nmetaphor signature\ndependency pattern\ntransformation pattern\ntrace layer references\n\nA Structure Fingerprint is not a verdict.\n\nIt does not prove copying, influence, imitation, or causality.\n\nIt is a comparison aid that supports Synchronization Audit Records.\n\nTrace Layer Integration\n\nTrace Layer Integration connects audit records and fingerprints to evidence anchors such as:\n\ncase studies\ntrace receipts\nsource contribution graphs\nrepository commits\npublic articles\nAI outputs\nexternal sources\n\nTrace references are pointers.\n\nThey are not automatic proof.\n\nv0.3 Principle\nA fingerprint is a map of resemblance.\nIt is not a verdict.\n\n## v0.4 Defense Court Protocol Integration\n\nv0.4 adds Defense Court Protocol Integration.\n\nThis layer does not create verdicts.\n\nIt prepares synchronization audit records and structure fingerprints for human review.\n\n### Added Documents\n\n```text\ndocs/\n└── defense-court-integration.md\nAdded Schema\nschemas/\n└── defense-court-bridge.schema.json\nAdded Example\nexamples/\n└── defense-court-bridge.example.yaml\nDefense Court Bridge\n\nA Defense Court Bridge record connects:\n\nsynchronization audit records\nstructure fingerprints\ncase studies\ntrace references\nevidence status\nclassification stability\nhuman review boundaries\n\nIt is designed for cases where similarity may create public accusation risk, attribution dispute, AI reconstruction concern, or high-impact interpretation.\n\nHuman Review Boundary\n\nv0.4 makes the review boundary explicit.\n\nAI may assist with:\n\nsummarization\nstructural comparison\nmissing evidence lists\nnon-verdict packet preparation\n\nAI must not:\n\ndeclare theft\nassign legal responsibility\nconvert similarity into proof\nbypass human review\ntreat structure fingerprints as verdicts\nv0.4 Principle\nAudit is not accusation.\nFingerprint is not proof.\nBridge is not verdict.\nHuman review is the gate.\n\n## v0.5 AI Agent Hook / Automatic Synchronization Detection\n\nv0.5 adds the AI Agent Hook.\n\nThis layer allows AI agents to detect possible synchronization signals and prepare candidate records.\n\nIt does not allow AI agents to produce final verdicts.\n\n### Added Documents\n\n```text\ndocs/\n└── ai-agent-hook.md\nAdded Schema\nschemas/\n└── ai-agent-hook.schema.json\nAdded Example\nexamples/\n└── ai-agent-hook.example.yaml\nAI Agent Hook\n\nThe AI Agent Hook can detect:\n\nvocabulary overlap\nstructural sequence overlap\nmetaphor overlap\ndependency pattern overlap\ntransformation pattern overlap\ntrace gaps\nAI context dependency\nAI reconstruction risk\nAgent Boundary\n\nAI may:\n\ndetect possible similarity signals\nprepare candidate records\nlist missing evidence\nrecommend human review\nproduce non-verdict summaries\n\nAI must not:\n\ndeclare theft\nassign legal responsibility\ntreat similarity as proof\ntreat candidate classification as final\nbypass human review\npublish accusation-level claims automatically\nv0.5 Principle\nAI detects.\nAI prepares.\nAI does not judge.\nFirst Complete Arc\n\nv0.5 completes the first protocol arc:\n\nv0.1 = Audit Ruler\nv0.2 = Case Study Layer\nv0.3 = Structure Fingerprint / Trace Layer\nv0.4 = Defense Court Protocol Integration\nv0.5 = AI Agent Hook / Automatic Synchronization Detection\n","project_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fsamuraiwriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol","html_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/projects/github.com%2Fsamuraiwriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol","lists_url":"https://awesome.ecosyste.ms/api/v1/projects/github.com%2Fsamuraiwriter7%2Fsynchronization-audit-protocol/lists"}