Ecosyste.ms: Awesome

An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

Awesome Lists | Featured Topics | Projects

https://github.com/ReactiveCocoa/reactiveswift-composable-architecture

A library for building applications in a consistent and understandable way, with composition, testing, and ergonomics in mind.
https://github.com/ReactiveCocoa/reactiveswift-composable-architecture

Last synced: 21 days ago
JSON representation

A library for building applications in a consistent and understandable way, with composition, testing, and ergonomics in mind.

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

        

# A Reactive Swift fork of The Composable Architecture

[![CI](https://github.com/ReactiveCocoa/reactiveswift-composable-architecture/workflows/CI/badge.svg)](https://github.com/ReactiveCocoa/reactiveswift-composable-architecture/actions?query=workflow%3ACI)
[![](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fswiftpackageindex.com%2Fapi%2Fpackages%2FReactiveCocoa%2Freactiveswift-composable-architecture%2Fbadge%3Ftype%3Dswift-versions)](https://swiftpackageindex.com/ReactiveCocoa/reactiveswift-composable-architecture)
[![](https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=https%3A%2F%2Fswiftpackageindex.com%2Fapi%2Fpackages%2FReactiveCocoa%2Freactiveswift-composable-architecture%2Fbadge%3Ftype%3Dplatforms)](https://swiftpackageindex.com/ReactiveCocoa/reactiveswift-composable-architecture)

[Point-Free's](https://github.com/pointfreeco) [The Composable Architecture](https://github.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture) uses Apple's Combine framework as the basis of its `Effect` type.

This fork has adapted The Composable Architecture to use [Reactive Swift](https://github.com/ReactiveCocoa/ReactiveSwift) as the basis for the `Effect` type. The original motivation for this was to allow using The Composable Architecture in OS versions prior to iOS 13 and macOS 10.15, which are the earliest versions that support Combine and, therefore, TCA. Linux compatibility was also added since release 0.8.1.

However, [for a number of reasons](http://michael-brown.net/2021/the-future-of-the-reactiveswift-composable-architecture/), maintaining support for older Apple OSes has become impractical, so as of release 0.33.1, the minimum OS requirements are the same as that of TCA: iOS 13 and macOS 10.15. Releases 0.28.1 and earlier of course still support older OS versions.

## Effect type implementations

Combine vs ReactiveSwift

In Pointfreeco's composable architecture the `Effect` type wraps a Combine `Producer`, and also conforms to the `Publisher` protocol. This is required due to the way that each operation on a `Publisher` (e.g. `map`) returns a new type of Publisher (`Publishers.Map` in the case of `map`), so in order to have a single `Effect` type these publisher types always need to be erased back to just the `Effect` type with `eraseToEffect()`.

Using ReactiveSwift, which doesn't use Combine's type model, `Effect` is simply a typealias for `SignalProducer`. There is never a need to type erase. Also, due to ReactiveSwift's lifetime based disposable handling, you rarely need to keep a reference to a `Disposable`, unlike in Combine, where you must always keep a reference to any `Cancellable` otherwise it will terminate immediately.

# The Composable Architecture

The Composable Architecture (TCA, for short) is a library for building applications in a consistent and understandable way, with composition, testing, and ergonomics in mind. It can be used in SwiftUI, UIKit, and more, and on any Apple platform (iOS, macOS, tvOS, and watchOS), and also on Linux.

The Composable Architecture (TCA, for short) is a library for building applications in a consistent
and understandable way, with composition, testing, and ergonomics in mind. It can be used in
SwiftUI, UIKit, and more, and on any Apple platform (iOS, macOS, tvOS, and watchOS).

* [What is the Composable Architecture?](#what-is-the-composable-architecture)
* [Learn more](#learn-more)
* [Examples](#examples)
* [Basic usage](#basic-usage)
* [Documentation](#documentation)
* [Installation](#installation)
* [Help](#help)
* [Translations](#translations)

## What is the Composable Architecture?

This library provides a few core tools that can be used to build applications of varying purpose and
complexity. It provides compelling stories that you can follow to solve many problems you encounter
day-to-day when building applications, such as:

* **State management**

How to manage the state of your application using simple value types, and share state across
many screens so that mutations in one screen can be immediately observed in another screen.

* **Composition**

How to break down large features into smaller components that can be extracted to their own,
isolated modules and be easily glued back together to form the feature.

* **Side effects**

How to let certain parts of the application talk to the outside world in the most testable
and understandable way possible.

* **Testing**

How to not only test a feature built in the architecture, but also write integration tests
for features that have been composed of many parts, and write end-to-end tests to understand how
side effects influence your application. This allows you to make strong guarantees that your
business logic is running in the way you expect.

* **Ergonomics**

How to accomplish all of the above in a simple API with as few concepts and moving parts as
possible.

## Learn More

The Composable Architecture was designed over the course of many episodes on
[Point-Free][pointfreeco], a video series exploring functional programming and the Swift language,
hosted by [Brandon Williams][mbrandonw] and [Stephen Celis][stephencelis].

You can watch all of the episodes [here][tca-episode-collection], as well as a dedicated, [multipart
tour][tca-tour] of the architecture from scratch.


video poster image

## Examples

[![Screen shots of example applications](https://d3rccdn33rt8ze.cloudfront.net/composable-architecture/demos.png)](./Examples)

This repo comes with _lots_ of examples to demonstrate how to solve common and complex problems with
the Composable Architecture. Check out [this](./Examples) directory to see them all, including:

* [Case Studies](./Examples/CaseStudies)
* Getting started
* Effects
* Navigation
* Higher-order reducers
* Reusable components
* [Search](./Examples/Search)
* [Speech Recognition](./Examples/SpeechRecognition)
* [Tic-Tac-Toe](./Examples/TicTacToe)
* [Todos](./Examples/Todos)
* [Voice memos](./Examples/VoiceMemos)

Looking for something more substantial? Check out the source code for [isowords][gh-isowords], an
iOS word search game built in SwiftUI and the Composable Architecture.

## Basic Usage

To build a feature using the Composable Architecture you define some types and values that model
your domain:

* **State**: A type that describes the data your feature needs to perform its logic and render its
UI.
* **Action**: A type that represents all of the actions that can happen in your feature, such as
user actions, notifications, event sources and more.
* **Reducer**: A function that describes how to evolve the current state of the app to the next
state given an action. The reducer is also responsible for returning any effects that should be
run, such as API requests, which can be done by returning an `Effect` value.
* **Store**: The runtime that actually drives your feature. You send all user actions to the store
so that the store can run the reducer and effects, and you can observe state changes in the store
so that you can update UI.

The benefits of doing this are that you will instantly unlock testability of your feature, and you
will be able to break large, complex features into smaller domains that can be glued together.

As a basic example, consider a UI that shows a number along with "+" and "−" buttons that increment
and decrement the number. To make things interesting, suppose there is also a button that when
tapped makes an API request to fetch a random fact about that number and then displays the fact in
an alert.

To implement this feature we create a new type that will house the domain and behavior of the
feature by conforming to `ReducerProtocol`:

```swift
import ComposableArchitecture

struct Feature: ReducerProtocol {
}
```

In here we need to define a type for the feature's state, which consists of an integer for the
current count, as well as an optional string that represents the title of the alert we want to show
(optional because `nil` represents not showing an alert):

```swift
struct Feature: ReducerProtocol {
struct State: Equatable {
var count = 0
var numberFactAlert: String?
}
}
```

We also need to define a type for the feature's actions. There are the obvious actions, such as
tapping the decrement button, increment button, or fact button. But there are also some slightly
non-obvious ones, such as the action of the user dismissing the alert, and the action that occurs
when we receive a response from the fact API request:

```swift
struct Feature: ReducerProtocol {
struct State: Equatable { … }
enum Action: Equatable {
case factAlertDismissed
case decrementButtonTapped
case incrementButtonTapped
case numberFactButtonTapped
case numberFactResponse(TaskResult)
}
}
```

And then we implement the `reduce` method which is responsible for handling the actual logic and
behavior for the feature. It describes how to change the current state to the next state, and
describes what effects need to be executed. Some actions don't need to execute effects, and they
can return `.none` to represent that:

```swift
struct Feature: ReducerProtocol {
struct State: Equatable { … }
enum Action: Equatable { … }

func reduce(into state: inout State, action: Action) -> EffectTask {
switch action {
case .factAlertDismissed:
state.numberFactAlert = nil
return .none

case .decrementButtonTapped:
state.count -= 1
return .none

case .incrementButtonTapped:
state.count += 1
return .none

case .numberFactButtonTapped:
return .task { [count = state.count] in
await .numberFactResponse(
TaskResult {
String(
decoding: try await URLSession.shared
.data(from: URL(string: "http://numbersapi.com/\(count)/trivia")!).0,
as: UTF8.self
)
}
)
}

case let .numberFactResponse(.success(fact)):
state.numberFactAlert = fact
return .none

case .numberFactResponse(.failure):
state.numberFactAlert = "Could not load a number fact :("
return .none
}
}
}
```

And then finally we define the view that displays the feature. It holds onto a `StoreOf`
so that it can observe all changes to the state and re-render, and we can send all user actions to
the store so that state changes. We must also introduce a struct wrapper around the fact alert to
make it `Identifiable`, which the `.alert` view modifier requires:

```swift
struct FeatureView: View {
let store: StoreOf

var body: some View {
WithViewStore(self.store, observe: { $0 }) { viewStore in
VStack {
HStack {
Button("−") { viewStore.send(.decrementButtonTapped) }
Text("\(viewStore.count)")
Button("+") { viewStore.send(.incrementButtonTapped) }
}

Button("Number fact") { viewStore.send(.numberFactButtonTapped) }
}
.alert(
item: viewStore.binding(
get: { $0.numberFactAlert.map(FactAlert.init(title:)) },
send: .factAlertDismissed
),
content: { Alert(title: Text($0.title)) }
)
}
}
}

struct FactAlert: Identifiable {
var title: String
var id: String { self.title }
}
```

It is also straightforward to have a UIKit controller driven off of this store. You subscribe to the
store in `viewDidLoad` in order to update the UI and show alerts. The code is a bit longer than the
SwiftUI version, so we have collapsed it here:

Click to expand!

```swift
class FeatureViewController: UIViewController {
let viewStore: ViewStoreOf

init(store: StoreOf) {
self.viewStore = ViewStore(store)
super.init(nibName: nil, bundle: nil)
}

required init?(coder: NSCoder) {
fatalError("init(coder:) has not been implemented")
}

override func viewDidLoad() {
super.viewDidLoad()

let countLabel = UILabel()
let incrementButton = UIButton()
let decrementButton = UIButton()
let factButton = UIButton()

// Omitted: Add subviews and set up constraints...

self.viewStore.produced
.map { "\($0.count)" }
.assign(to: \.text, on: countLabel)

self.viewStore.produced.numberFactAlert
.startWithValues { [weak self] numberFactAlert in
let alertController = UIAlertController(
title: numberFactAlert, message: nil, preferredStyle: .alert
)
alertController.addAction(
UIAlertAction(
title: "Ok",
style: .default,
handler: { _ in self?.viewStore.send(.factAlertDismissed) }
)
)
self?.present(alertController, animated: true, completion: nil)
}
}

@objc private func incrementButtonTapped() {
self.viewStore.send(.incrementButtonTapped)
}
@objc private func decrementButtonTapped() {
self.viewStore.send(.decrementButtonTapped)
}
@objc private func factButtonTapped() {
self.viewStore.send(.numberFactButtonTapped)
}
}
```

Once we are ready to display this view, for example in the app's entry point, we can construct a
store. This can be done by specifying the initial state to start the application in, as well as
the reducer that will power the application:

```swift
import ComposableArchitecture

@main
struct MyApp: App {
var body: some Scene {
WindowGroup {
FeatureView(
store: Store(
initialState: Feature.State(),
reducer: Feature()
)
)
}
}
}
```

And that is enough to get something on the screen to play around with. It's definitely a few more
steps than if you were to do this in a vanilla SwiftUI way, but there are a few benefits. It gives
us a consistent manner to apply state mutations, instead of scattering logic in some observable
objects and in various action closures of UI components. It also gives us a concise way of
expressing side effects. And we can immediately test this logic, including the effects, without
doing much additional work.

### Testing

> For more in-depth information on testing, see the dedicated [testing][testing-article] article.

To test use a `TestStore`, which can be created with the same information as the `Store`, but it
does extra work to allow you to assert how your feature evolves as actions are sent:

```swift
@MainActor
func testFeature() async {
let store = TestStore(
initialState: Feature.State(),
reducer: Feature()
)
}
```

Once the test store is created we can use it to make an assertion of an entire user flow of steps.
Each step of the way we need to prove that state changed how we expect. For example, we can
simulate the user flow of tapping on the increment and decrement buttons:

```swift
// Test that tapping on the increment/decrement buttons changes the count
await store.send(.incrementButtonTapped) {
$0.count = 1
}
await store.send(.decrementButtonTapped) {
$0.count = 0
}
```

Further, if a step causes an effect to be executed, which feeds data back into the store, we must
assert on that. For example, if we simulate the user tapping on the fact button we expect to
receive a fact response back with the fact, which then causes the alert to show:

```swift
await store.send(.numberFactButtonTapped)

await store.receive(.numberFactResponse(.success(???))) {
$0.numberFactAlert = ???
}
```

However, how do we know what fact is going to be sent back to us?

Currently our reducer is using an effect that reaches out into the real world to hit an API server,
and that means we have no way to control its behavior. We are at the whims of our internet
connectivity and the availability of the API server in order to write this test.

It would be better for this dependency to be passed to the reducer so that we can use a live
dependency when running the application on a device, but use a mocked dependency for tests. We can
do this by adding a property to the `Feature` reducer:

```swift
struct Feature: ReducerProtocol {
let numberFact: (Int) async throws -> String

}
```

Then we can use it in the `reduce` implementation:

```swift
case .numberFactButtonTapped:
return .task { [count = state.count] in
await .numberFactResponse(TaskResult { try await self.numberFact(count) })
}
```

And in the entry point of the application we can provide a version of the dependency that actually
interacts with the real world API server:

```swift
@main
struct MyApp: App {
var body: some Scene {
FeatureView(
store: Store(
initialState: Feature.State(),
reducer: Feature(
numberFact: { number in
let (data, _) = try await URLSession.shared
.data(from: .init(string: "http://numbersapi.com/\(number)")!)
return String(decoding: data, as: UTF8.self)
}
)
)
)
}
}
```

But in tests we can use a mock dependency that immediately returns a deterministic, predictable
fact:

```swift
@MainActor
func testFeature() async {
let store = TestStore(
initialState: Feature.State(),
reducer: Feature(
numberFact: { "\($0) is a good number Brent" }
)
)
}
```

With that little bit of upfront work we can finish the test by simulating the user tapping on the
fact button, receiving the response from the dependency to trigger the alert, and then dismissing
the alert:

```swift
await store.send(.numberFactButtonTapped)

await store.receive(.numberFactResponse(.success("0 is a good number Brent"))) {
$0.numberFactAlert = "0 is a good number Brent"
}

await store.send(.factAlertDismissed) {
$0.numberFactAlert = nil
}
```

We can also improve the ergonomics of using the `numberFact` dependency in our application. Over
time the application may evolve into many features, and some of those features may also want access
to `numberFact`, and explicitly passing it through all layers can get annoying. There is a process
you can follow to “register” dependencies with the library, making them instantly available to any
layer in the application.

> For more in-depth information on dependency management, see the dedicated [dependencies][dependencies-article] article.

We can start by wrapping the number fact functionality in a new type:

```swift
struct NumberFactClient {
var fetch: (Int) async throws -> String
}
```

And then registering that type with the dependency management system by conforming the client to
the `DependencyKey` protocol, which requires you to specify the live value to use when running the
application in simulators or devices:

```swift
extension NumberFactClient: DependencyKey {
static let liveValue = Self(
fetch: { number in
let (data, _) = try await URLSession.shared
.data(from: .init(string: "http://numbersapi.com/\(number)")!)
return String(decoding: data, as: UTF8.self)
}
)
}

extension DependencyValues {
var numberFact: NumberFactClient {
get { self[NumberFactClient.self] }
set { self[NumberFactClient.self] = newValue }
}
}
```

With that little bit of upfront work done you can instantly start making use of the dependency in
any feature:

```swift
struct Feature: ReducerProtocol {
struct State { … }
enum Action { … }
@Dependency(\.numberFact) var numberFact

}
```

This code works exactly as it did before, but you no longer have to explicitly pass the dependency
when constructing the feature's reducer. When running the app in previews, the simulator or on a
device, the live dependency will be provided to the reducer, and in tests the test dependency will
be provided.

This means the entry point to the application no longer needs to construct dependencies:

```swift
@main
struct MyApp: App {
var body: some Scene {
FeatureView(
store: Store(
initialState: Feature.State(),
reducer: Feature()
)
)
}
}
```

And the test store can be constructed without specifying any dependencies, but you can still
override any dependency you need to for the purpose of the test:

```swift
let store = TestStore(
initialState: Feature.State(),
reducer: Feature()
) {
$0.numberFact.fetch = { "\($0) is a good number Brent" }
}


```

That is the basics of building and testing a feature in the Composable Architecture. There are
_a lot_ more things to be explored, such as composition, modularity, adaptability, and complex
effects. The [Examples](./Examples) directory has a bunch of projects to explore to see more
advanced usages.

## Documentation

The documentation for releases and `main` are available here:

* [`main`](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture)
* [0.49.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.49.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)


Other versions


* [0.48.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.48.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.47.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.47.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.46.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.46.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.45.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.45.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.44.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.44.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.43.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.43.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.42.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.42.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.41.2](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.41.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.40.2](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.40.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)
* [0.39.0](https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/0.39.0/documentation/composablearchitecture/)


There are a number of articles in the documentation that you may find helpful as you become more
comfortable with the library:

* [Getting started][getting-started-article]
* [Dependency management][dependencies-article]
* [Testing][testing-article]
* [Performance][performance-article]
* [Concurrency][concurrency-article]
* [Bindings][bindings-article]
* [Migrating to the reducer protocol][migrating-article]

## Installation

You can add ComposableArchitecture to an Xcode project by adding it as a package dependency.

1. From the **File** menu, select **Add Packages...**
2. Enter "https://github.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture" into the package
repository URL text field
3. Depending on how your project is structured:
- If you have a single application target that needs access to the library, then add
**ComposableArchitecture** directly to your application.
- If you want to use this library from multiple Xcode targets, or mix Xcode targets and SPM
targets, you must create a shared framework that depends on **ComposableArchitecture** and
then depend on that framework in all of your targets. For an example of this, check out the
[Tic-Tac-Toe](./Examples/TicTacToe) demo application, which splits lots of features into
modules and consumes the static library in this fashion using the **tic-tac-toe** Swift
package.

## Help

If you want to discuss the Composable Architecture or have a question about how to use it to solve
a particular problem, you can start a topic in the [discussions][gh-discussions] tab of this repo,
or ask around on [its Swift forum][swift-forum].

## Translations

The following translations of this README have been contributed by members of the community:

* [Arabic](https://gist.github.com/NorhanBoghdadi/1b98d55c02b683ddef7e05c2ebcccd47)
* [French](https://gist.github.com/nikitamounier/0e93eb832cf389db12f9a69da030a2dc)
* [Indonesian](https://gist.github.com/wendyliga/792ea9ac5cc887f59de70a9e39cc7343)
* [Italian](https://gist.github.com/Bellaposa/5114e6d4d55fdb1388e8186886d48958)
* [Japanese](https://gist.github.com/kalupas226/bdf577e4a7066377ea0a8aaeebcad428)
* [Korean](https://gist.github.com/pilgwon/ea05e2207ab68bdd1f49dff97b293b17)
* [Portuguese](https://gist.github.com/SevioCorrea/2bbf337cd084a58c89f2f7f370626dc8)
* [Simplified Chinese](https://gist.github.com/sh3l6orrr/10c8f7c634a892a9c37214f3211242ad)
* [Spanish](https://gist.github.com/pitt500/f5e32fccb575ce112ffea2827c7bf942)

If you'd like to contribute a translation, please [open a
PR](https://github.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture/edit/main/README.md) with a link
to a [Gist](https://gist.github.com)!

## FAQ

* How does the Composable Architecture compare to Elm, Redux, and others?

Expand to see answer
The Composable Architecture (TCA) is built on a foundation of ideas popularized by the Elm
Architecture (TEA) and Redux, but made to feel at home in the Swift language and on Apple's
platforms.

In some ways TCA is a little more opinionated than the other libraries. For example, Redux is
not prescriptive with how one executes side effects, but TCA requires all side effects to be
modeled in the `Effect` type and returned from the reducer.

In other ways TCA is a little more lax than the other libraries. For example, Elm controls what
kinds of effects can be created via the `Cmd` type, but TCA allows an escape hatch to any kind
of effect since `Effect` conforms to the Combine `Publisher` protocol.

And then there are certain things that TCA prioritizes highly that are not points of focus for
Redux, Elm, or most other libraries. For example, composition is very important aspect of TCA,
which is the process of breaking down large features into smaller units that can be glued
together. This is accomplished with reducer builders and operators like `Scope`, and it aids in
handling complex features as well as modularization for a better-isolated code base and improved
compile times.

## Credits and thanks

The following people gave feedback on the library at its early stages and helped make the library
what it is today:

Paul Colton, Kaan Dedeoglu, Matt Diephouse, Josef Doležal, Eimantas, Matthew Johnson, George
Kaimakas, Nikita Leonov, Christopher Liscio, Jeffrey Macko, Alejandro Martinez, Shai Mishali, Willis
Plummer, Simon-Pierre Roy, Justin Price, Sven A. Schmidt, Kyle Sherman, Petr Šíma, Jasdev Singh,
Maxim Smirnov, Ryan Stone, Daniel Hollis Tavares, and all of the [Point-Free][pointfreeco]
subscribers 😁.

Special thanks to [Chris Liscio](https://twitter.com/liscio) who helped us work through many strange
SwiftUI quirks and helped refine the final API.

And thanks to [Shai Mishali](https://github.com/freak4pc) and the
[CombineCommunity](https://github.com/CombineCommunity/CombineExt/) project, from which we took
their implementation of `Publishers.Create`, which we use in `Effect` to help bridge delegate and
callback-based APIs, making it much easier to interface with 3rd party frameworks.

## Other libraries

The Composable Architecture was built on a foundation of ideas started by other libraries, in
particular [Elm](https://elm-lang.org) and [Redux](https://redux.js.org/).

There are also many architecture libraries in the Swift and iOS community. Each one of these has
their own set of priorities and trade-offs that differ from the Composable Architecture.

* [RIBs](https://github.com/uber/RIBs)
* [Loop](https://github.com/ReactiveCocoa/Loop)
* [ReSwift](https://github.com/ReSwift/ReSwift)
* [Workflow](https://github.com/square/workflow)
* [ReactorKit](https://github.com/ReactorKit/ReactorKit)
* [RxFeedback](https://github.com/NoTests/RxFeedback.swift)
* [Mobius.swift](https://github.com/spotify/mobius.swift)
*
And more

* [Fluxor](https://github.com/FluxorOrg/Fluxor)
* [PromisedArchitectureKit](https://github.com/RPallas92/PromisedArchitectureKit)

## License

This library is released under the MIT license. See [LICENSE](LICENSE) for details.

[pointfreeco]: https://www.pointfree.co
[mbrandonw]: https://twitter.com/mbrandonw
[stephencelis]: https://twitter.com/stephencelis
[tca-episode-collection]: https://www.pointfree.co/collections/composable-architecture
[tca-tour]: https://www.pointfree.co/collections/tours/composable-architecture
[gh-isowords]: https://github.com/pointfreeco/isowords
[gh-discussions]: https://github.com/pointfreeco/swift-composable-architecture/discussions
[swift-forum]: https://forums.swift.org/c/related-projects/swift-composable-architecture
[testing-article]: https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/testing
[dependencies-article]: https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/dependencymanagement
[getting-started-article]: https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/gettingstarted
[performance-article]: https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/performance
[concurrency-article]: https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/swiftconcurrency
[bindings-article]: https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/bindings
[migrating-article]: https://pointfreeco.github.io/swift-composable-architecture/main/documentation/composablearchitecture/migratingtothereducerprotocol