Ecosyste.ms: Awesome

An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

Awesome Lists | Featured Topics | Projects

https://github.com/agriffis/pure-getopt

drop-in replacement for GNU getopt implemented in pure Bash
https://github.com/agriffis/pure-getopt

bash getopt

Last synced: 5 days ago
JSON representation

drop-in replacement for GNU getopt implemented in pure Bash

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

        

# pure-getopt

[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.com/agriffis/pure-getopt.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.com/github/agriffis/pure-getopt)

pure-getopt is a drop-in replacement for GNU getopt, implemented in pure
Bash compatible back to 2.05b. It makes no external calls and faithfully
reimplements GNU getopt features, including:

* all three calling forms in the synopsis
* all getopt options
* matching error messages
* matching return codes
* proper handling of abbreviated long options
* alternative parsing mode (long options with single dash)
* GETOPT_COMPATIBLE flag
* POSIXLY_CORRECT flag
* leading + or - on options string

# How to use it

pure-getopt provides a single bash function `getopt` that you can insert
directly into your script. It should be defined before calling `getopt` from
your code, so either place the definition above your code, or use this
pattern (recommended):

```bash
#!/bin/bash

main() {
declare argv
argv=$(getopt -o fb: --long foo,bar: -- "$@") || return
eval "set -- $argv"

declare foo=false bar=

while true; do
case $1 in
f|foo) foo=true ; shift ;;
b|bar) bar=$2 ; shift 2 ;;
--) break ;;
esac
done

# etc
}

# INSERT getopt function here
getopt() {
...
}

# CALL main at very bottom, passing script args.
# The test here distinguishes script execution from "source myscript.bash" which
# will define the functions without calling main, for calling functions from
# another script or testing at the command-line.
[[ $BASH_SOURCE != "$0" ]] || main "$@"
```

# Differences between pure-getopt and GNU getopt

The only intentional divergences between pure-getopt and GNU getopt are
either inconsequential or due to bugs in GNU getopt:

1. GNU getopt mishandles ambiguities in abbreviated long options, for
example this doesn't produce an error message:

getopt -o '' --long xy,xz -- --x

but this does produce an error message:

getopt -o '' --long xy,xz: -- --x

Pure-getopt generates an error message in both cases, diverging from
GNU getopt to fix this bug.

2. In the case of an ambiguous long option with an argument, GNU getopt
generates an error message that includes the argument:

getopt: option '--x=foo' is ambiguous; possibilities: '--xy' '--xz'

We consider this a bug in GNU getopt, since the value might be very
long and inappropriate for printing to the screen, and since GNU getopt
ordinarily omits the value in its error messages. Pure-getopt's error
message in this case is:

getopt: option '--x' is ambiguous; possibilities: '--xy' '--xz'

3. Pure-getopt uses a different method of quoting the output. The result
is the same as GNU getopt when eval'd by the shell.

# References

* [getopt in util-linux](http://software.frodo.looijaard.name/getopt/)