Ecosyste.ms: Awesome

An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

Awesome Lists | Featured Topics | Projects

https://github.com/andrew-johnson-4/PunCalculus

A variant of Typed Lambda Calculus with generalized variable punning (ad-hoc polymorphism)
https://github.com/andrew-johnson-4/PunCalculus

computer-science language programming-language

Last synced: 1 day ago
JSON representation

A variant of Typed Lambda Calculus with generalized variable punning (ad-hoc polymorphism)

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

        

# [Pun Calculus](https://github.com/andrew-johnson-4/PunCalculus/wiki)
A variant of Typed Lambda Calculus with generalized variable punning (ad-hoc polymorphism). This methodology may be useful for adapting other type theories into concurrent domains.

## Contribution

Ad-Hoc Polymorphism is introduced to the Simply Typed Lambda Calculus by pluralizing lambda abstractions.
Terms such as `λx:X. y` are represented instead as `λ⟨x:X. y⟩`.
Plural abstractions are represented with more braces: `λ⟨a:A. b⟩⟨x:X. y⟩`.
The type system is also extended slightly to support plural types: `A + B`.

## Types

$$abstraction \quad \frac{\Gamma \vdash a:A \quad \Gamma \vdash b:B \quad \Gamma \vdash x:X \quad \Gamma \vdash y:Y \quad λ⟨a.b⟩⟨x.y⟩}{\Gamma \vdash λ⟨a.b⟩⟨x.y⟩:(A \to B) + (X \to Y)}$$

$$application \quad \frac{\Gamma \vdash f:(A \to B) + (C \to D) + (X \to Y) \quad \Gamma \vdash x:A + X \quad f(x)}{\Gamma \vdash f(x):B + Y}$$

## Evaluation

Rules for evaluation are mostly the same as lambda calculus with the exception of plural arrows that may *carry* multiple values at a time. This feature leads to the possibility of plural values which may diverge in new ways.

Example split (singular value yields plural):
```punc
λ⟨a:Int.True⟩⟨x:Int.x⟩ 3
---------------------------------
⟨True⟩⟨3⟩
```

Example merge (plural value yields singular):
```punc
λ⟨a:Bool.2⟩⟨x:Int.2⟩ (⟨False⟩⟨5⟩)
---------------------------------
⟨2⟩
```

Example carry (plural value yields plural):
```punc
λ⟨a:Bool.not a⟩⟨x:Int.- x 2⟩ (⟨False⟩⟨5⟩)
---------------------------------
⟨True⟩⟨3⟩
```

## Optional Constraints

It may often be desirable to entirely prevent plural values.
This would require the type system to show that no splits will happen, which are always the root cause of plural values.
Notice that plural types always have plural values.

$$ban \ plurals \quad \frac{\Gamma \vdash f:(A \to B)+(A \to C) \quad \Gamma \vdash x:A \quad \Gamma \vdash f(x)}{\Gamma \vdash \bot}$$

Banning plurals still permits ad-hoc polymorphism in the *either-or* cases.

## Notes

"Plural Types" are similar to product types plus the implicit subtyping relations that `A + B ⇒ A` and `A + B ⇒ B`.
Types are either singular or plural, never both.
If you want to turn `A + B` into a singular type, then you could write it as its corresponding product: `(A,B)`.

## Direct Citations

[A very brisk introduction to Type Theory](https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/type+theory)

## Similar Work

[The Kernel of Ad Hoc Polymorphism](https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/106072/965197677-MIT.pdf)