https://github.com/bfontaine/set

:handbag: ultra-simple set for Go
https://github.com/bfontaine/set

go library

Last synced: 12 months ago
JSON representation

:handbag: ultra-simple set for Go

• Host: GitHub
• URL: https://github.com/bfontaine/set
• Owner: bfontaine
• License: mit
• Created: 2015-06-05T22:21:48.000Z (about 11 years ago)
• Default Branch: master
• Last Pushed: 2015-06-19T12:22:52.000Z (about 11 years ago)
• Last Synced: 2025-07-14T03:52:56.265Z (12 months ago)
• Topics: go, library
• Language: Go
• Homepage: https://godoc.org/github.com/bfontaine/set
• Size: 108 KB
• Stars: 0
• Watchers: 2
• Forks: 0
• Open Issues: 0
• Metadata Files:
  • Readme: README.md
  • Contributing: CONTRIBUTING.md
  • License: LICENSE

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

          
# Set

[![GoDoc](https://godoc.org/github.com/bfontaine/set?status.svg)](https://godoc.org/github.com/bfontaine/set)

[![Build Status](https://travis-ci.org/bfontaine/set.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/bfontaine/set)

Package `set` provides an ultra-simple set implementation in Go.

## Features

* `int` and `string` sets

* Thread-safe

* `Add`, `Remove`, `Contains`, `Size`, `Iterate`. That’s all.

## Install

    go get github.com/bfontaine/set

## Usage

```go

s := set.NewStringSet()

s.Add("foo")

s.Add("bar")

s.Contains("foo") // true

s.Contains("qux") // false

s.Remove("foo")

s.Contains("foo") // false

```

## Alternatives

* [golang-set](https://github.com/deckarep/golang-set): provides a lot more

  features

## FAQ

### Why didn’t you use golang-set?

Because I needed a really simple `string` set and didn’t care about anything

other than the operations mentioned above. And golang-set uses `interface{}`,

which was an unnecessary overhead here.

### Why is there Ruby code here?

Set implementations are the same for all types so I use a small Ruby script and

`go generate` to generate the code for all types at once.