An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

https://github.com/browserify/ify-loader

Webpack loader to handle browserify transforms as intended.
https://github.com/browserify/ify-loader

Last synced: 4 months ago
JSON representation

Webpack loader to handle browserify transforms as intended.

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

          

# ify-loader

[![experimental](http://badges.github.io/stability-badges/dist/experimental.svg)](http://github.com/badges/stability-badges)

[Webpack](https://github.com/webpack/webpack) loader to handle [browserify transforms](https://github.com/substack/browserify-handbook#browserifytransform-field) as intended.

## Usage

Install the loader using [npm](https://npmjs.com/):

``` glsl
npm install --save ify-loader
```

You can then update your `webpack.config.js` in a similar fashion to the following to add browserify transform support to your project's dependencies:

``` javascript
module.exports = {
module: {
loaders: [
// This applies the loader to all of your dependencies,
// and not any of the source files in your project:
{
test: /node_modules/,
loader: 'ify-loader'
}
]
}
}
```

### Using transforms in your project

Note that you're also free to apply this loader to files in your own project. Include the following in your project's `webpack.config.js`:

``` javascript
module.exports = {
module: {
loaders: [
// support local package.json browserify config
{
test: /\.js$/,
loader: 'ify-loader',
enforce: 'post'
}
]
}
}
```

Any browserify transforms you include in `package.json` will get picked up and applied this way:

``` json
{
"name": "my-project",
"dependencies": {
"glslify": "5.0.0",
"brfs": "1.4.2"
},
"browserify": {
"transform": [
"glslify",
"brfs"
]
}
}
```

## Why?

When given the choice, I lean more in favour of [browserify](http://browserify.org) for its simplicity and compatability with node.js — however from time to time I need to work on projects that use webpack. The thing I run into issues with most often when switching between the two is the difference in how webpack handles source transforms compared to browserify.

Webpack provides you with a "global" configuration where you specify how your project and its dependencies are transformed in a single place. Browserify, however, scopes transforms to the current package to avoid conflicts between different dependencies' sources using the [`browserify.transform` property](https://github.com/substack/node-browserify#browserifytransform) in `package.json`.

There are pros and cons to both approaches — Webpack gives you more control, at the expense of having to configure each transform used in your dependency tree. Unlike [transform-loader](https://github.com/webpack/transform-loader), *ify-loader* will automatically determine which browserify transforms to apply to your dependencies for you the same way that browserify itself does, making the process a lot more bearable in complex projects!

## See Also

* [browserify](https://github.com/substack/node-browserify)
* [webpack](https://github.com/webpack/webpack)
* [transform-loader](https://github.com/webpack/transform-loader)

## License

MIT, see [LICENSE.md](http://github.com/hughsk/ify-loader/blob/master/LICENSE.md) for details.