An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

https://github.com/code-charity/crowd-fixes

Crowdsource (y)our view. Universal tweaks to refine, renew, re-imagine the web. (Imagine uBlock 'My Filters' as a global collaboration). One-fit-all. The web as a visual-collaboration/-wiki. - We can unite the web's litter removers, (universal) minimalism or (universally favorable web-)street art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
https://github.com/code-charity/crowd-fixes

Last synced: about 1 year ago
JSON representation

Crowdsource (y)our view. Universal tweaks to refine, renew, re-imagine the web. (Imagine uBlock 'My Filters' as a global collaboration). One-fit-all. The web as a visual-collaboration/-wiki. - We can unite the web's litter removers, (universal) minimalism or (universally favorable web-)street art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

          

## "crowdFixes" - _`Crowdsource (y)our view`_

- a new word. Collective tweaks easier than "user scripts", but universally relevant/functional and a collective crowd effort) (unlike "user styles" for specific tastes).

usertweaks

`IDEA:` Crowd-Sourcing universal CSS improvements or annotations to refine, renew, reimagine the web.
- One-fit-all. The web as collaboration / wiki

- **Mandate:** Tweaks for everybody.

- **Debate:** If we can achieve the best, then can we also make the community of volunteers grow/prosper from it?
Or must we tolerate, if our work will be implemented by the originals, after we prove it right, without giving us credit?)

- **Scheme / "Rules of the game":** Everybody runs every tweak out of a pool/catalogue, that is was voted up, democratically or near consensus by the community, i.e. >80% "Yes", while quickly disabling a tweak could also inevitably change one's vote to "No". Collecting at least 100 votes for each, by users/volunteers & revisors/developers. ( * Wisdom Of The Crowd: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOucwX7Z1HU) (User IDs could be random, data could be public, on a central server or in a blockchain / L2 blockchain)
- **1.** This will motivate thoughtfulness, unexpected help, wonderful creativitiy:
- Deleting useless things
- Enlarging tiny inputs & Auto-focus if they are the only input.
- Web-street art.
- Correcting fake news in place.
- ...
- **2.** There can be specific rule sets, as in Adblockers. For example one called "Brand-Me-Not" or "Logo-Hater", removing logos in the top left of websites. (Except those that >20% of users whitelist and think of as relevant content (be it for being non-profits, social or small enough, or so). While this set-example as a whole might not be wanted by more than >80% of people, so that it will be at risk of becoming optional opt-in. Yet a 2nd-level (another consensus within), will raise the value of the whole, so that it might be visible enough. While 2nd-level thresholds could be auto-adjusted to optimize the overall-acceptance of a set.)
- **3.** Most tweaks will be per domain, yet can any be applied for a wide URL-range? ( Such as .edu? - And for everybody - "Holy-Grail"?).
- ("Brand-Me-Not", may be half-done with body :nth-child(-n+5){ \*[id="logo"], img[src^="logo."], img[src*="/logo."], \*[href="#"] \*, \*[href="/"] \*, \*:not([class~=" "]).logo, [id="logo"], :is(img)[src^="logo."], :is(img)[src\*="/logo."], [href="#"] \*, [href="/"] \*, :not([class~=" "]).logo {display:none})

-------------
-------------

- In other words:
- compare: https://github.com/letsblockit/letsblockit
- Similar: UserScripts & UserStyles but pragmatic, with voting resulting in collectively running things & little effort per person
- [UserScripts](https://greasyfork.org) (Often require some review, same as browser extensions. )
- [UserStyles.org](https://userstyles.org) (Currently mostly themes/playful. Easy adjustability tho already.)
- Not only for devs [css-peeper](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/css-peeper/mbnbehikldjhnfehhnaidhjhoofhpehk), [user js&css](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/user-javascript-and-css/nbhcbdghjpllgmfilhnhkllmkecfmpld), [Live css,less,sass:octocat:](https://github.com/webextensions/live-css-editor)
- Nor "Remix the web"-niche for style-nerds [chrome.google/webstore/amino-live-css](https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/amino-live-css-editor/pbcpfbcibpcbfbmddogfhcijfpboeaaf)

----

### Just some quick examples (drafts) :
1. The following two github standard labels can be boring / unnecessary to watch, so lets make them just a bit less visible:

github standard labelshelp wanted good first issue

`a[data-name^='help wanted'], a[data-name^='good first issue'] {opacity: 0.80; transform:scale(0.96);}`


google analytics too small
google analytics filter
2. The google analytics filter field is very small since ages. It also is very far on the right.



Lets make it just a little better: .ID-filterBox { width:190px !important; font-size: 14px !important; height: 21px !important;}



3. Youtube's sidebar is very bold and contrasty, compared to actuall videos. Lets counter balance that by just 12% transparency: #secondary {opacity:0.88}

### Testing methods:
- uBlock Origin or https://github.com/code-charity/dark-mode/

usertweaks youtube related videos sidebar usertweaks user styles

-----

https://www.reddit.com/r/UserTweaks/