Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/henrikingo/xml2json
Translate any XML document to corresponding JSON or vice versa
https://github.com/henrikingo/xml2json
Last synced: 13 days ago
JSON representation
Translate any XML document to corresponding JSON or vice versa
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/henrikingo/xml2json
- Owner: henrikingo
- License: lgpl-2.1
- Created: 2013-11-25T08:47:57.000Z (almost 11 years ago)
- Default Branch: master
- Last Pushed: 2014-01-30T13:42:47.000Z (almost 11 years ago)
- Last Synced: 2024-08-01T22:53:58.240Z (3 months ago)
- Language: JavaScript
- Size: 164 KB
- Stars: 52
- Watchers: 8
- Forks: 21
- Open Issues: 1
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.md
- License: LICENSE
Awesome Lists containing this project
README
xml2json
========Translate any XML document to corresponding JSON or vice versa
HISTORY
-------Most of this code was written by Stefan Gössner and published at:
http://goessner.net/download/prj/jsonxml/You can read a description of what the library originally did at:
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2006/05/31/converting-between-xml-and-json.htmlI did 2 major changes to the original code:
1. XML attributes are translated as siblings, rather than children, to their
corresponding "parent" element in JSON. This produces more **deterministic**
translation.
2. Use JSON list structure more frequently. This ensures **lossless** translation
in more cases than the original and also is capable of handling some "mixed"
cases that the original would just pass along as untranslated XML.
Details of these changes are explained below. For anything else, read the xml.com
article linked above.USAGE
-----The xml2json library works both in a browser and node.js. (In node.js, it depends
on libxml plugin.)For example usage in a browser, see xmljson_demo.html
For example usage in node.js, see http://github.com/henrikingo/node-xml2json
DETAILS
-------An explanation of changes wrt the original library by Stefan Grössner follows:
Consider the following 2 translations in the original library:
text
{
"e":"text"
}vs
text
{
"e":{
"@name":"value",
"#text":"text"
}
}=> the path to "text" changes depending on whether the element has attributes
present or not. Very bad if there could be optional attributes, or attributes
added over time.For more examples, see http://goessner.net/download/prj/jsonxml/xmljson_test.html
Solution is to lift out attributes to be on the same level as the element itself:
text
{
e@name:"value",
e:"text"
}Note that for empty elements, we still explicitly print null for clarity:
{
e@name:"value",
e:null
}The other fix is to use lists to more closely resemble original xml structure
in case of multiple children with same node name.Original:
text text
{
"e":{"a":[
"text",
"text"
]}
}Me:
text text
{
e:[
{
a:"text"
},
{
a:"text"
}
]
}This approach allows to handle "mixed content" elements better, where original
gives up:xy
{
"a":"xy"
}Me:
xy
{
a:[
"x",
{
c:null
},
"y"
]
}(Same fix also supports CDATA sections, should there be any.)
TODO
----All types are strings. Preferably types would be defined in xml schema, and
the xml parser would return node values in correct javascript type. If this is
not the case, we can emulate something by converting strings to other types in
a separate function to be done later (ie xml schema hard coded into a js function)
For database searches, having the correct types will help.Not yet supported in json->xml:
Multi-dimensional arrays. What is the correct xml presentation for this?
{ e : [["a", "b"], ["c", "d"]] }