Data

Tools

Indexes

Applications

Experiments

Awesome

An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

https://github.com/jbn/vaquero

A Python library for iterative and interactive data wrangling at laptop-scale.
https://github.com/jbn/vaquero

data data-analysis data-cleaning data-mining dirty-data elt etl etl-framework

Last synced: 7 months ago
JSON representation

A Python library for iterative and interactive data wrangling at laptop-scale.

Awesome Lists containing this project

README 

          
.. image:: https://travis-ci.org/jbn/vaquero.svg?branch=master

    :target: https://travis-ci.org/jbn/vaquero

.. image:: https://ci.appveyor.com/api/projects/status/bbs3p2osllgohxco?svg=true

    :target: https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jbn/vaquero/branch/master

.. image:: https://coveralls.io/repos/github/jbn/vaquero/badge.svg?branch=master

    :target: https://coveralls.io/github/jbn/vaquero?branch=master 

.. image:: https://img.shields.io/pypi/v/vaquero.svg

    :target: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/vaquero

.. image:: https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg

    :target: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jbn/vaquero/master/LICENSE

.. image:: https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/vaquero.svg

    :target: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/vaquero



What is Vaquero?

================



.. image:: logo.png

   :alt: vaquero logo

   :align: center



TL;DR

-----



It's a library for iterative and interactive data wrangling at

laptop-scale. If you spend a lot of time in a `Jupyter

notebook `__, trying to clean dirty, raw data, it's

probably useful.



It would be nice if it were possible to write data cleaning code

correctly. But, the people who pay you to do data analysis don't do data

analysis and don't understand how dangerous dirty data are, so you

rarely get the luxury of feeling secure with what you extract. Vaquero

tries to find a balance between "business" demands and good hygiene.

Borrowing from Larry Wall, it tries "to make the easy things easy, and

the hard things possible." In this context, "hard things" refers to

those wonderfully fun situations where, you write some code that you

know will break in the future but you have no time to fix it; then,

three months later, it breaks and you have no idea what your code does.



See also: `On Disappearing

Code `__



An Example

----------



It's easier to get a sense of "why" by looking at a notebook.



-  `Notebook for the common usage

   pattern `__

-  `Notebook for inline

   pipelines `__



Expecting Exceptions

--------------------



Vaquero *expects* exceptions, making them pretty unexceptional. But,

Python's exception handling is cheap, so that's fine (i.e. EAFP --

Easier to ask for forgiveness than permission). Plus, with dirty data,

you know it will probably fail for some records. During development,

rather than halting each time, vaquero continues on its merry way, up to

some failure limit. For each failure, the library logs the exception,

including the name of the file *and* the arguments which resulted in a

failure.



After you have processed all the documents, you can then inspect the

errors. This helps you scan for error patterns, rather than programming

by the coincidence of the first error raised. Moreover, since you the

offending function and its arguments, it is easy to update the new

function, ensuring it passes with the prior bad example. Vaquero reloads

the pipeline for you. (Or, at least tries to, because reloading is

tricky.)



Modules as Pipelines

--------------------



    Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!



Programmers use namespaces everywhere to organize their code. Yet, when

writing data cleaning code, everything ends up in a big file with lots

of poorly-named functions. Think: ``from hellishlib import *``. The

perfectionist in me says, "this is awful, and I should write it

properly, as a full library with lots of unit tests!" But, for

"perfectionists with deadlines," that's not possible.



Furthermore, the single-file-of-functions pattern emerges not only

because of time constraints; it's a reflection of the problem! ELT code

is **inherently** tightly-coupled. Code that extracts this variable

probably depends on that one which in turn also depends on some other

one. This leads to a tree of transformations, encapsulated by function

calls.



Recognizing this, ``vaquero`` doesn't try to move you away from

collecting all your ELT code in a single file. It's going to happen

anyway. Instead, it makes it safer with some conventions.



1. A module represents a single encapsulated pipeline. It should process

   a well-defined document.

2. The function definition order is meaningful. Functions at the top of

   the file execute before those above them. Again, it's a pipeline.

3. As per pythonic convention, functions prefixed with ``_`` are

   private. Here, that means, the pipeline constructor ignores it when

   compiling the pipeline. This gives you nice helper functions.

4. You're probably not going to use unit tests -- you don't have time.

   But, since it's a module, pepper it with assertions. And, using the

   ``_``-prefix, you can actually write namespaced tests (e.g.

   ``_my_test()``), and immediately call them in the module. (I actually

   write a lot of my code with ``unittest`` in the pipeline module and

   it gets called right before the module fully imports.) Then, when you

   break something, you can't even start pipeline processing. It fails

   fast. (You can deviate from this pattern -- but, in general, don't.)



Installation

------------



.. code:: sh



    pip install vaquero



Tips

----



The ``f(src, dst)`` Pattern

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



For most of my pipelines, I tend to write functions that look like,



.. code:: python



    def f(src_d, dst_d):

        dst_d['age'] = int(src_d['AGE1'])



Coming from functional languages, I'd prefer immutable objects. But, in

Python, that tends to be painfully slow. This pattern represents a

compromise that usually works well. On the one side (``dst_d``) you have

already processed elements; on the other, the raw data.



Hidden field pattern

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



-  Assume you are processing a pipeline with a dict destination

   document. Use '\_key\_name' fields for intermediary results in a

   document. You can delete them at the end of the pipeline (easily, via

   ``vaquero.transformations.remove_private_keys``), but in the interim,

   you'll see these fields on failure.



Disclaimer

----------



I have this big monstrous library called vaquero on my computer. It's a

collection of lots of functions I've written over (entirely too) many

data munging projects. I use it often, and keep telling myself "once I

find the time, I'll release it!" And, that never happens. It's too big

to clean up in a way that makes me comfortable. Instead, I'll be

releasing little bits of code in a ad-hoc, just-in-time fashion. When I

absolutely need some feature of the big library going forward, I'll

extract it and put it here.



That makes me wildly uncomfortable, but...I'm starving for time.



In any case, library-user beware. Things will break.



.. |Build Status| image:: https://travis-ci.org/jbn/vaquero.svg?branch=master

   :target: https://travis-ci.org/jbn/vaquero

.. |Coverage Status| image:: https://coveralls.io/repos/github/jbn/vaquero/badge.svg?branch=master

   :target: https://coveralls.io/github/jbn/vaquero?branch=master