Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/madhusudhand/node-performance
Performance metrics of different NodeJS frameworks
https://github.com/madhusudhand/node-performance
donode express express-js expressjs hapi hapijs node-js nodejs performance performance-analysis performance-metrics performance-test restify restifyjs
Last synced: about 1 month ago
JSON representation
Performance metrics of different NodeJS frameworks
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/madhusudhand/node-performance
- Owner: madhusudhand
- License: mit
- Created: 2016-12-24T06:46:17.000Z (about 8 years ago)
- Default Branch: master
- Last Pushed: 2017-07-21T08:31:12.000Z (over 7 years ago)
- Last Synced: 2024-10-30T21:42:45.201Z (3 months ago)
- Topics: donode, express, express-js, expressjs, hapi, hapijs, node-js, nodejs, performance, performance-analysis, performance-metrics, performance-test, restify, restifyjs
- Language: JavaScript
- Homepage:
- Size: 16.6 KB
- Stars: 4
- Watchers: 3
- Forks: 0
- Open Issues: 0
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.md
- License: LICENSE
Awesome Lists containing this project
README
# node-performance
In this repo, I've run a round of tests for different node frameworks.
## Results
| Rank | Framework | Version | Req. served Per Sec. |
| ---- | --------- | ------------ | -------------------- |
| #1 | donode | 1.0.0-beta.3 | 1200 - 1300 |
| #2 | express | 4.14.1 | 900 - 1200 |
| #3 | restify | 4.3.0 | 900 - 1150 |
| #4 | hapi | 16.1.0 | 350 - 500 |
Out of the listed frameworks results are quite near for all except for **hapi**.
hapi seems to be damn slower and clearly out of race.
**GET:**
express and restify are serving around **1200** requests per second.
Whereas *donode* is slightly higher and is **1250+** requests per second.
**POST:**
restify and express *POST* requests are not as performant as their *GET* requests. They are slightly slower and are about **1000** requests per sercond.
Whereas **donode** performing almost equal to its *GET* requests at a rate about **1200** requests per second.
#### donode wins !!
This framework is performing better than all in all categories and also code looks pretty much organized.
But its a **new framework** and currently in **beta** version.
### Detailed results
I've broken the results down and by request type have included requests served per sec and mean latency.
Note:- Two tests performed per request type here are the observed results.
| Framework | Request type | Req. served Per Sec. | Mean Latency |
| --------- | ------------ | -------------------- | ------------ |
| donode | GET | 1262 | 15.8 ms |
| | | 1203 | 16.5 ms |
| | POST | 1214 | 16.4 ms |
| | | 1218 | 16.3 ms |
| express | GET | 1135 | 17.5 ms |
| | | 989 | 20.1 ms |
| | POST | 1038 | 19.2 ms |
| | | 907 | 21.9 ms |
| restify | GET | 1220 | 16.3 ms |
| | | 1158 | 17.2 ms |
| | POST | 957 | 20.8 ms |
| | | 935 | 21.2 ms |
| hapi | GET | 496 | 40.2 ms |
| | | 418 | 47.7 ms |
| | POST | 349 | 57.1 ms |
| | | 389 | 51.3 ms |
#### Test conditions
| Condition | Values/Comments |
| ----------------------- | --------------- |
| Number of requests sent | 10,000 |
| Concurrency | 20 requests |
| Routes | 10 different routes with route params |
| Computer Config | |
| - OS | Mac 10.12.3 |
| - RAM | 16 GB |
| - Processor | 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5 |
| Node version | 6.9 |
## Running Tests
1. clone this repo
2. npm install (run another "npm install" inside donode directory)
3. npm install -g loadtest
4. npm run framework-name
and loadtest using the following.
#### GET
```sh
loadtest -n 10000 -c 20 http://localhost:3000/loadtest/get/10/data10/20
```
#### POST
```sh
loadtest -n 10000 -c 20 -m POST -T application/json -P '{"key": "value"}' http://localhost:3000/loadtest/post/1/data10/2
```
> TODO: Test execution needs to be simplified.