Ecosyste.ms: Awesome

An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

Awesome Lists | Featured Topics | Projects

https://github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map

A high-performance, thread-safe generic concurrent hash map implementation with Swiss Map.
https://github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map

Last synced: 2 days ago
JSON representation

A high-performance, thread-safe generic concurrent hash map implementation with Swiss Map.

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

        

# Concurrent Swiss Map [![GoDoc][doc-img]][doc] [![Build Status][ci-img]][ci] [![Coverage Status][cov-img]][cov] [![Go Report Card][go-report-img]][go-report]

**Concurrent Swiss Map** is an open-source Go library that provides a high-performance, thread-safe generic concurrent hash map implementation designed to handle concurrent access efficiently. It's built with a focus on simplicity, speed, and reliability, making it a solid choice for scenarios where concurrent access to a hash map is crucial.

Uses [dolthub/swiss](https://github.com/dolthub/swiss) map implementation under the hood.

## Installation

Supports 1.18+ Go versions because of Go Generics

```
go get github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map
```

## Usage

New functions will be added soon...

```go
package main

import (
"hash/fnv"

csmap "github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map"
)

func main() {
myMap := csmap.New[string, int](
// set the number of map shards. the default value is 32.
csmap.WithShardCount[string, int](32),

// if don't set custom hasher, use the built-in maphash.
csmap.WithCustomHasher[string, int](func(key string) uint64 {
hash := fnv.New64a()
hash.Write([]byte(key))
return hash.Sum64()
}),

// set the total capacity, every shard map has total capacity/shard count capacity. the default value is 0.
csmap.WithSize[string, int](1000),
)

key := "swiss-map"
myMap.Store(key, 10)

val, ok := myMap.Load(key)
println("load val:", val, "exists:", ok)

deleted := myMap.Delete(key)
println("deleted:", deleted)

ok = myMap.Has(key)
println("has:", ok)

empty := myMap.IsEmpty()
println("empty:", empty)

myMap.SetIfAbsent(key, 11)

myMap.Range(func(key string, value int) (stop bool) {
println("range:", key, value)
return true
})

count := myMap.Count()
println("count:", count)

// Output:
// load val: 10 exists: true
// deleted: true
// has: false
// empty: true
// range: swiss-map 11
// count: 1
}
```

## Basic Architecture
![img.png](img.png)

## Benchmark Test
Benchmark was made on:
- Apple M1 Max
- 32 GB memory

Benchmark test results can be obtained by running [this file](concurrent_swiss_map_benchmark_test.go) on local computers.

![benchmark.png](benchmark.png)

### Benchmark Results

- Memory usage of the concurrent swiss map is better than other map implementations in all checked test scenarios.
- In high concurrent systems, the concurrent swiss map is faster, but in systems containing few concurrent operations, it works similarly to RWMutexMap.

[doc-img]: https://godoc.org/github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map?status.svg
[doc]: https://godoc.org/github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map
[ci-img]: https://github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map/actions/workflows/build-test.yml/badge.svg
[ci]: https://github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map/actions/workflows/build-test.yml
[cov-img]: https://codecov.io/gh/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map/branch/master/graph/badge.svg
[cov]: https://codecov.io/gh/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map
[go-report-img]: https://goreportcard.com/badge/github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map
[go-report]: https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/mhmtszr/concurrent-swiss-map