Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/mristin/icontract-hypothesis
Combine contracts and automatic testing.
https://github.com/mristin/icontract-hypothesis
Last synced: about 1 month ago
JSON representation
Combine contracts and automatic testing.
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/mristin/icontract-hypothesis
- Owner: mristin
- License: mit
- Created: 2020-12-16T13:17:58.000Z (almost 4 years ago)
- Default Branch: main
- Last Pushed: 2022-06-05T20:45:22.000Z (over 2 years ago)
- Last Synced: 2024-09-15T09:39:37.536Z (3 months ago)
- Language: Python
- Size: 181 KB
- Stars: 77
- Watchers: 4
- Forks: 2
- Open Issues: 2
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.rst
- License: LICENSE
Awesome Lists containing this project
- awesome-python-testing - icontract-hypothesis - Instead of writing manually the Hypothesis search strategies for a function, `icontract-hypothesis` infers them based on the function's precondition. (Property Based Testing)
README
icontract-hypothesis
====================
.. image:: https://github.com/mristin/icontract-hypothesis/workflows/CI/badge.svg
:target: https://github.com/mristin/icontract-hypothesis/actions?query=workflow%3ACI
:alt: Continuous integration
.. image:: https://coveralls.io/repos/github/mristin/icontract-hypothesis/badge.svg?branch=main
:target: https://coveralls.io/github/mristin/icontract-hypothesis?branch=main
:alt: Test coverage
.. image:: https://badge.fury.io/py/icontract-hypothesis.svg
:target: https://badge.fury.io/py/icontract-hypothesis
:alt: PyPI - version
.. image:: https://img.shields.io/pypi/pyversions/icontract-hypothesis.svg
:alt: PyPI - Python Version
Icontract-hypothesis combines design-by-contract with automatic testing.
It is an integration between
`icontract `_
library for design-by-contract and
`Hypothesis `_ library for
property-based testing.
The result is a powerful combination that allows you to automatically test
your code. Instead of writing manually the Hypothesis search strategies for
a function, icontract-hypothesis infers them based on
the function's precondition. This makes automatic testing as effortless as it
goes.
You can use icontract-hypothesis:
* As a library, to write succinct unit tests,
* As a command-line tool or as a tool integrated in your IDE
(*e.g.*, `icontract-hypothesis-vim `__,
`icontract-hypothesis-pycharm `__ and
`icontract-hypothesis-vscode `__).
This allows you to automatically test functions during the development and
use it in your continuous integration,
* As a ghostwriter utility giving you a starting point for your more elaborate
Hypothesis strategies.
Since the contracts live close to the code, evolving the code also automatically
evolves the tests.
Usage
-----
Library
~~~~~~~
There are two ways to integrate icontract-hypothesis in your tests as a library.
**Only assume.** First, you can use it for defining the assumptions of the test based on the
precondition:
.. code-block:: python
>>> from hypothesis import given
>>> import hypothesis.strategies as st
>>> import icontract
>>> import icontract_hypothesis
>>> @icontract.require(lambda x: x > 0)
... @icontract.ensure(lambda result: result > 0)
... def some_func(x: int) -> int:
... return x - 1000
>>> assume_preconditions = icontract_hypothesis.make_assume_preconditions(
... some_func)
>>> @given(x=st.integers())
... def test_some_func(x: int) -> None:
... assume_preconditions(x)
... some_func(x)
>>> test_some_func()
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
icontract.errors.ViolationError: File , line 2 in :
result > 0:
result was -999
x was 1
The function ``assume_preconditions`` created by
``icontract_hypothesis.make_assume_preconditions`` will reject all the input
values which do not satisfy the pre-conditions of ``some_func``.
**Infer strategy**. Second, you can automatically infer the strategy and test the function:
.. code-block:: python
>>> import icontract
>>> import icontract_hypothesis
>>> @icontract.require(lambda x: x > 0)
... @icontract.ensure(lambda result: result > 0)
... def some_func(x: int) -> int:
... return x - 1000
>>> icontract_hypothesis.test_with_inferred_strategy(some_func)
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
icontract.errors.ViolationError: File , line 2 in :
result > 0:
result was -999
x was 1
Which approach to use depends on how you want to write your tests.
The first approach, using ``assume_preconditions``, is practical if you already
defined your search strategy and you only want to exclude a few edge cases.
The second approach, automatically inferring test strategies, is useful if you
just want to test your function without specifying any particular search strategy.
Icontract-hypothesis guarantees that the inferred strategy must satisfy the preconditions.
If it does not, you should consider it a bug in which case
please `create an issue `_
so that we can fix it.
If you want to inspect the strategy or further refine it programmatically, use
``icontract_hypothesis.infer_strategy``:
.. code-block:: python
>>> import math
>>> import icontract
>>> import icontract_hypothesis
>>> @icontract.require(lambda x: x > 0)
... @icontract.require(lambda x: x > math.sqrt(x))
... def some_func(x: float) -> int:
... pass
>>> icontract_hypothesis.infer_strategy(some_func)
fixed_dictionaries({'x': floats(min_value=0, exclude_min=True).filter(lambda x: x > math.sqrt(x))})
Testing Tool
~~~~~~~~~~~~
We provide ``pyicontract-hypothesis test`` command-line tool which you can use
to automatically test a module.
.. Help starts: pyicontract-hypothesis test --help
.. code-block::
usage: pyicontract-hypothesis test [-h] -p PATH
[--settings [SETTINGS [SETTINGS ...]]]
[--inspect] [-i [INCLUDE [INCLUDE ...]]]
[-e [EXCLUDE [EXCLUDE ...]]]
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-p PATH, --path PATH Path to the Python file to test
--settings [SETTINGS [SETTINGS ...]]
Specify settings for Hypothesis
The settings are assigned by '='.
The value of the setting needs to be encoded as JSON.
Example: max_examples=500
--inspect Only show the strategy and the settings
No tests are executed.
-i [INCLUDE [INCLUDE ...]], --include [INCLUDE [INCLUDE ...]]
Regular expressions, lines or line ranges of the functions to process
If a line or line range overlaps the body of a function,
the function is considered included.
Example 1: ^do_something.*$
Example 2: 3
Example 3: 34-65
-e [EXCLUDE [EXCLUDE ...]], --exclude [EXCLUDE [EXCLUDE ...]]
Regular expressions, lines or line ranges of the functions to exclude
If a line or line range overlaps the body of a function,
the function is considered excluded.
Example 1: ^do_something.*$
Example 2: 3
Example 3: 34-65
.. Help ends: pyicontract-hypothesis test --help
Note that ``pyicontract-hypothesis test`` can be trivially integrated with
your IDE if you can pass in the current cursor position and the
current file name.
Ghostwriting Tool
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Writing property-based tests by hand is tedious and can be partially automated.
To that end, we implemented a ghostwriter utility ``pyicontract-hypothesis ghostwrite``
that generates a first draft based on pre-conditions that you manually refine further:
.. Help starts: pyicontract-hypothesis ghostwrite --help
.. code-block::
usage: pyicontract-hypothesis ghostwrite [-h] (-m MODULE | -p PATH)
[-o OUTPUT] [--explicit] [--bare]
[-i [INCLUDE [INCLUDE ...]]]
[-e [EXCLUDE [EXCLUDE ...]]]
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-m MODULE, --module MODULE
Module to ghostwrite the unit tests for
-p PATH, --path PATH Path to the module to ghostwrite the unit tests for.
If the file represents a module reachable through
sys.path, use the qualified module name in
the unit test.
Otherwise, the module is represented as the stem
of the path with all non-identifier characters
replaced with an underscore ("_").
-o OUTPUT, --output OUTPUT
Path to the file where the output should be written.
If '-', writes to STDOUT.
--explicit Write the inferred strategies explicitly
This is practical if you want to tune and
refine the strategies and just want to use
ghostwriting as a starting point.
Mind that pyicontract-hypothesis does not
automatically fix imports as this is
usually project-specific. You have to fix imports
manually after the ghostwriting.
--bare Print only the body of the tests and omit header/footer
(such as TestCase class or import statements).
This is useful when you only want to inspect a single test or
include a single test function in a custom test suite.
-i [INCLUDE [INCLUDE ...]], --include [INCLUDE [INCLUDE ...]]
Regular expressions, lines or line ranges of the functions to process
If a line or line range overlaps the body of a function,
the function is considered included.
Example 1: ^do_something.*$
Example 2: 3
Example 3: 34-65
-e [EXCLUDE [EXCLUDE ...]], --exclude [EXCLUDE [EXCLUDE ...]]
Regular expressions, lines or line ranges of the functions to exclude
If a line or line range overlaps the body of a function,
the function is considered excluded.
Example 1: ^do_something.*$
Example 2: 3
Example 3: 34-65
.. Help ends: pyicontract-hypothesis ghostwrite --help
The examples of ghostwritten tests are available at:
`tests/pyicontract_hypothesis/samples `_
Running Tools as Module
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If for some reason you want to run the tools as a module, just invoke:
.. Help starts: python -m icontract_hypothesis --help
.. code-block::
usage: icontract_hypothesis [-h] {test,ghostwrite} ...
Combine property-based testing with contracts of a Python module.
positional arguments:
{test,ghostwrite} Commands
test Test the functions automatically by inferring search
strategies from preconditions
ghostwrite Ghostwrite the unit tests with inferred search strategies
optional arguments:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
.. Help ends: python -m icontract_hypothesis --help
Installation
------------
icontract-hypothesis is available on PyPI at
https://pypi.org/project/icontract-hypothesis, so you can use ``pip``:
.. code-block::
pip3 install icontract-hypothesis
Search Strategies
-----------------
A naive approach to fuzzy testing is to randomly sample input data, filter it
based on pre-conditions and ensure post-conditions after the run. However,
if your acceptable band of input values is narrow, the rejection sampling
will become impractically slow.
For example, assume a pre-condition ``5 < x < 10``.
Sampling from all possible integers for ``x`` will rarely hit
the pre-condition (if ever) thus wasting valuable computational time.
The problem is exacerbated as the number of arguments grow due to
`the curse of dimensionality `_.
Icontract-hypothesis tries to address the search strategies
a bit more intelligently:
* The pre-conditions are matched against common code patterns to define
the strategies. For example, ``5 < x < 10`` gives a search strategy
``hypothesis.strategies.integers(min=6, max=9)``.
We currently match bounds on all available Hypothesis types
(``int``, ``float``, ``datetime.date`` *etc*.).
We also match regular expressions on ``str`` arguments.
* Pre-conditions which could not be matched, but operate on a single argument
are inferred based on the type hint and composed with Hypothesis
``FilteredStrategy``.
* The remainder of the pre-conditions are enforced by filtering on the whole
fixed dictionary which is finally passed into the function as keyword arguments.
There is an ongoing effort to move the strategy matching code into Hypothesis and
develop it further to include many more cases. See
`this Hypothesis issue `_.
Note that static analysis of the source code may not determine all the defined names in various
scopes as they can also be injected dynamically (*e.g.*, setting ``__globals__`` attribute or
``globals()[random.choice("abc")] = 1``).
As long as you keep fancy dynamic acrobatics out of your contracts,
the strategy inference by icontract-hypothesis should work fine.
Classes
~~~~~~~
Hypothesis automatically builds composite input arguments (classes, dataclasses,
named tuples *etc*.). If your class enforces pre-conditions in the constructor
method (``__init__``), make sure that it inherits from ``icontract.DBC``.
That way icontract-hypothesis will use
`hypothesis.strategies.register_type_strategy `__
to register your class with Hypothesis and consider pre-conditions when building
its instances.
It is important that you should *not* use
`hypothesis.strategies.builds `_
with the classes using contracts in their constructors as
`builds `_
will disregard the registered strategy. You should use
`hypothesis.strategies.from_type `_
instead. See
`this comment on an Hypothesis issue `_
and
`the corresponding answer `_.
Many times default inferred strategies for the constructors should be enough, though you
are of course not restricted to them. You can register your own strategies with
`hypothesis.strategies.register_type_strategy `__
. Icontract-hypothesis will respect the previous registrations and will not overwrite them.
IDE Plug-ins
------------
* `icontract-hypothesis-vim `__ for
`VIM `_
* `icontract-hypothesis-pycharm `__ for
`PyCharm `_
* `icontract-hypothesis-vscode `__ for
`Visual Studio Code `_
Related Libraries
-----------------
Python design-by-contract libraries
`deal `_ and
`dpcontracts `_
integrate directly with Hypothesis (see
`this page `_ and
`that page `_,
respectively).
As of 2020-12-16:
**Behavioral subtyping.** Neither of the two libraries handles behavioral sub-typing correctly
(*i.e.*, they do not weaken and strengthen the pre-conditions, and
post-conditions and invariants, respectively).
Hence they can not be used with class hierarchies as the contracts are not
properly inherited.
This is not strictly related to property-based testing,
but presents an inherent flaw in how they implement contracts.
Hence even if you manually supply a search strategy that
fulfills behavioral subtyping, these two libraries would
report (or ignore) an error.
Consider this example with `deal `__:
.. code-block:: Python
class A:
@deal.post(lambda result: result % 2 == 0)
def some_func(self) -> int:
return 2
class B(A):
@deal.post(lambda result: result % 3 == 0)
def some_func(self) -> int:
# The result 9 satisfies the postcondition of B.some_func,
# but not the postcondition of A.some_func thus
# breaking the behavioral subtyping.
return 9
b = B()
# The correct behavior would be to throw an exception here.
b.some_func()
**Rejection sampling.** The two libraries only provide rejection sampling which is insufficient
for many practical use cases. For example, the computational time grows exponentially with the
number of arguments (see Section "Search Strategies").
**Propagation of contracts.** Finally, the existing libraries do not automatically propagate
pre-conditions of constructors to Hypothesis so automatic testing with composite inputs
(such as instances of classes) is currently not possible with these two libraries. The user can,
of course, manually design search strategies that satisfy the contracts.
In contrast, icontract-hypothesis does that hard-lifting for you automatically.
Benchmarks
~~~~~~~~~~
We run benchmarks against `deal` and `dpcontracts` libraries as part of our continuous integration.
We benchmark against functions using 1, 2 and 3 arguments, respectively, with the precondition that
the argument should be positive (*e.g.*, ``a > 0``). We sampled 100 inputs per each run.
.. Benchmark report starts.
The following scripts were run:
* `benchmarks/compare_with_others.py `_
The benchmarks were executed on Intel(R) Xeon(R) E-2276M CPU @ 2.80GHz.
We used Python 3.8.5, icontract 2.4.1, deal 4.4.0 and dpcontracts 0.6.0.
The following tables summarize the results.
Benchmarking Hypothesis testing:
Argument count: 1
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
Case Total time Time per run Relative time per run
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
`benchmark_icontract_inferred_strategy` 0.48 s 48.29 ms 100%
`benchmark_icontract_assume_preconditions` 0.79 s 78.75 ms 163%
`benchmark_dpcontracts` 1.06 s 106.17 ms 220%
`benchmark_deal` 0.83 s 82.63 ms 171%
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
Argument count: 2
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
Case Total time Time per run Relative time per run
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
`benchmark_icontract_inferred_strategy` 0.63 s 63.45 ms 100%
`benchmark_icontract_assume_preconditions` 1.65 s 165.05 ms 260%
`benchmark_dpcontracts` 2.10 s 209.51 ms 330%
`benchmark_deal` 1.61 s 161.09 ms 254%
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
Argument count: 3
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
Case Total time Time per run Relative time per run
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
`benchmark_icontract_inferred_strategy` 0.72 s 71.66 ms 100%
`benchmark_icontract_assume_preconditions` 3.30 s 330.20 ms 461%
`benchmark_dpcontracts` 4.23 s 423.31 ms 591%
`benchmark_deal` 3.20 s 319.57 ms 446%
========================================== ============ ============== =======================
.. Benchmark report ends.
Versioning
==========
We follow `Semantic Versioning `_.
The version X.Y.Z indicates:
* X is the major version (backward-incompatible),
* Y is the minor version (backward-compatible), and
* Z is the patch version (backward-compatible bug fix).