Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/octodemo/codeql-selective-analysis
https://github.com/octodemo/codeql-selective-analysis
Last synced: 3 months ago
JSON representation
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/octodemo/codeql-selective-analysis
- Owner: octodemo
- Created: 2023-08-18T12:31:46.000Z (about 1 year ago)
- Default Branch: main
- Last Pushed: 2023-08-18T13:27:33.000Z (about 1 year ago)
- Last Synced: 2024-02-15T15:35:09.445Z (9 months ago)
- Language: JavaScript
- Size: 8.79 KB
- Stars: 2
- Watchers: 5
- Forks: 0
- Open Issues: 2
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.md
Awesome Lists containing this project
- awesome-codeql - codeql-selective-analysis - Make CodeQL a required status check for Pull Requests, but to skip the analysis in the case that only a certain subset of files are modified (CodeQL Enforcement)
README
# CodeQL selective analysis on Pull Requests
This repo contains an example workflow file demonstrating how to make `CodeQL` a required status check for Pull Requests, but to skip the analysis in the case that only a certain subset of files are modified (for example, documentation files).
This solution works by skipping the CodeQL Analysis phase if only certain files are modified, and manually setting the relevant required status.
## Demo
* PR https://github.com/octodemo/codeql-selective-analysis/pull/1 only changes documentation, and the analysis is skipped, but the required check is still satisfied.
* PR https://github.com/octodemo/codeql-selective-analysis/pull/2 modifies the code, and runs the analysis.
## Pre-requisiteIn order to manually set the required status, we first need to modify the relevant "Branch Protection" rule to specify that the status is permitted to come from any source:
![image](https://github.com/octodemo/codeql-selective-analysis/assets/5377966/3d54891f-13fd-40fe-8998-68c9b7de69d9)
## Usage
The [sample workflow](.github/workflows/codeql-analysis.yml) demonstrates the basic pattern. We first need to identify which files have been changed as part of the pull request, through the use of a separate job we call `filter-paths`:
```
filter-paths:
name: Identify paths which have changed
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
outputs:
changes_outside_docs: ${{ steps.filter-docs.outputs.changes_outside_docs }}
steps:
- uses: dorny/paths-filter@v2
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
id: filter-docs
with:
filters: |
changes_outside_docs:
- '!(docs/**)'
```This uses the `dorny/paths-filter` action to identify the modified files and determine if there are any changes outside the "docs/" directory, the set a `changes_outside_docs` output from the job to be `true` if there are changes outside the docs directory and `false` if not. `dorny/paths-filter` provides a general globbing syntax based on https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch.
> Note: it is important you do not exclude any files which may influence how the source code is analyzed
If you prefer not to add a third-dependency, this list of modified files can instead be fetched using the GitHub API ([List pull requests files](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/pulls/pulls?apiVersion=2022-11-28#list-pull-requests-files)) and manually parsed for the relevant changed.
The next step is to modify the standard CodeQL `analyze` job as follows:
```
analyze:
name: Analyze
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: filter-paths
if: github.event_name != 'pull_request' || needs.filter-paths.outputs.changes_outside_docs == 'true'
...
```We first add a dependency on the `filter-paths` job using the `needs` property. We then add a conditional to the job, that states the job is only run if the event is not a pull request, or if changes have occurred outside the docs directory (according to the previously set output property of the `filter-paths` job). This will prevent the `analyze` job from running if the event is a pull request and only the `docs` directory was modified.
Finally, we add a new job, `skip-codeql-check`. In the case that the `analyze` job does not run this job will be used to set the required commit status for the `CodeQL` context:
```
skip-codeql-check:
name: Skip CodeQL check
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
needs: filter-paths
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request' && needs.filter-paths.outputs.changes_outside_docs == 'false'
steps:
- uses: actions/github-script@v6
with:
script: |
const paramObj = {
owner: context.repo.owner,
repo: context.repo.repo,
sha: context.payload.pull_request.head.sha,
state: 'success',
description: "Skipped CodeQL analysis as only non-code artifacts were modified.",
context: "CodeQL"
};
console.log(paramObj);
const result = await github.rest.repos.createCommitStatus(paramObj);
console.log(result);
```This job uses the `actions/github-script` API to set the commit status for `CodeQL` to "success", and to add an explanatory comment saying that the real check was skipped because no relevant files were changed.