An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

https://github.com/revfactory/harness

A meta-skill that designs domain-specific agent teams, defines specialized agents, and generates the skills they use.
https://github.com/revfactory/harness

claude-code claude-code-plugin harness harness-engineering

Last synced: 15 days ago
JSON representation

A meta-skill that designs domain-specific agent teams, defines specialized agents, and generates the skills they use.

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

          


Harness Banner


Version
License
Claude Code Plugin
6 Architecture Patterns
Agent Teams
GitHub Stars


Layer
Sub-layer
i18n

# Harness β€” The Team-Architecture Factory for Claude Code

**English** | [ν•œκ΅­μ–΄](README_KO.md) | [ζ—₯本θͺž](README_JA.md)

> **Harness is a team-architecture factory for Claude Code.** Say **"build a harness for this project"** (English) or **"ν•˜λ„€μŠ€ κ΅¬μ„±ν•΄μ€˜"** (ν•œκ΅­μ–΄) or **"γƒγƒΌγƒγ‚Ήγ‚’ζ§‹ζˆγ—γ¦"** (ζ—₯本θͺž), and the plugin turns your domain description into an agent team and the skills they use β€” picked from six pre-defined team-architecture patterns.

## Overview

Harness leverages Claude Code's agent team system to decompose complex tasks into coordinated teams of specialized agents. Say "build a harness for this project" and it automatically generates agent definitions (`.claude/agents/`) and skills (`.claude/skills/`) tailored to your domain.

## Category β€” Where Harness Sits

Harness lives at the **L3 Meta-Factory** layer of the Claude Code ecosystem β€” the layer that generates other harnesses rather than being one. Inside L3, we pick a specific sub-layer: **Team-Architecture Factory**.

| Layer | What it does | Neighbors we coexist with |
|-------|--------------|---------------------------|
| **L3 β€” Meta-Factory / Team-Architecture Factory** (us) | Domain sentence β†’ agent team + skills, via 6 pre-defined team patterns | β€” |
| L3 β€” Meta-Factory / Runtime-Configuration Factory | Deterministic, repeatable runtime configurations | [coleam00/Archon](https://github.com/coleam00/Archon) |
| L3 β€” Meta-Factory / Codex Runtime Port | Same concept, Codex runtime | [SaehwanPark/meta-harness](https://github.com/SaehwanPark/meta-harness) |
| L2 β€” Cross-Harness Workflow | Standardize skills/rules/hooks across multiple harnesses | [affaan-m/ECC](https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code) |

> Archon generates deterministic runtime configurations. Harness generates team architectures (pipeline, fan-out/fan-in, expert pool, producer-reviewer, supervisor, hierarchical delegation) plus the skills agents use. Different sub-layers of the same L3. Pick Archon for runtime determinism, Harness for team architecture, or combine them.

## Star History





Star History Chart

## Key Features

- **Agent Team Design** β€” 6 architectural patterns: Pipeline, Fan-out/Fan-in, Expert Pool, Producer-Reviewer, Supervisor, and Hierarchical Delegation
- **Skill Generation** β€” Auto-generates skills with Progressive Disclosure for efficient context management
- **Orchestration** β€” Inter-agent data passing, error handling, and team coordination protocols
- **Validation** β€” Trigger verification, dry-run testing, and with-skill vs without-skill comparison tests

## Harness Evolution Mechanism

The harness evolution mechanism feeds deltas (what worked / what didn't) back into the factory, so the next generation is measurably better. When a generated harness is used in a real project, the `/harness:evolve` skill captures the delta between the initial architecture and the shipped one, and feeds it back into the factory so the next generation for a similar domain starts closer to the shipped state.

```
Initial harness ──▢ Real project use ──▢ Shipped harness
β”‚
β–Ό (delta capture via /harness:evolve)
β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”
β”‚ Factory │◀── better next-gen draft
β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜
```

We call this the **Harness Evolution Mechanism** (KR: ν•˜λ„€μŠ€ μ§„ν™” λ©”μ»€λ‹ˆμ¦˜; JA: γƒγƒΌγƒγ‚Ήι€²εŒ–γƒ‘γ‚«γƒ‹γ‚Ίγƒ ).

## Workflow

```
Phase 1: Domain Analysis
↓
Phase 2: Team Architecture Design (Agent Teams vs Subagents)
↓
Phase 3: Agent Definition Generation (.claude/agents/)
↓
Phase 4: Skill Generation (.claude/skills/)
↓
Phase 5: Integration & Orchestration
↓
Phase 6: Validation & Testing
```

## Installation

### Via Marketplace

#### Add the marketplace
```shell
/plugin marketplace add revfactory/harness
```

#### Install the plugin
```shell
/plugin install harness@harness
```

### Direct Installation as Global Skill

```shell
# Copy the skills directory to ~/.claude/skills/harness/
cp -r skills/harness ~/.claude/skills/harness
```

## Plugin Structure

```
harness/
β”œβ”€β”€ .claude-plugin/
β”‚ └── plugin.json # Plugin manifest
β”œβ”€β”€ skills/
β”‚ └── harness/
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ SKILL.md # Main skill definition (6-Phase workflow)
β”‚ └── references/
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ agent-design-patterns.md # 6 architectural patterns
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ orchestrator-template.md # Team/subagent orchestrator templates
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ team-examples.md # 5 real-world team configurations
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ skill-writing-guide.md # Skill authoring guide
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ skill-testing-guide.md # Testing & evaluation methodology
β”‚ └── qa-agent-guide.md # QA agent integration guide
└── README.md
```

## Usage

Trigger in Claude Code with prompts like:

```
Build a harness for this project
Design an agent team for this domain
Set up a harness
```

### Execution Modes

| Mode | Description | Recommended For |
|------|-------------|-----------------|
| **Agent Teams** (default) | TeamCreate + SendMessage + TaskCreate | 2+ agents requiring collaboration |
| **Subagents** | Direct Agent tool invocation | One-off tasks, no inter-agent communication needed |


Harness Agent Team

### Architecture Patterns

| Pattern | Description |
|---------|-------------|
| Pipeline | Sequential dependent tasks |
| Fan-out/Fan-in | Parallel independent tasks |
| Expert Pool | Context-dependent selective invocation |
| Producer-Reviewer | Generation followed by quality review |
| Supervisor | Central agent with dynamic task distribution |
| Hierarchical Delegation | Top-down recursive delegation |

## Output

Files generated by Harness:

```
your-project/
β”œβ”€β”€ .claude/
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ agents/ # Agent definition files
β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ analyst.md
β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ builder.md
β”‚ β”‚ └── qa.md
β”‚ └── skills/ # Skill files
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ analyze/
β”‚ β”‚ └── SKILL.md
β”‚ └── build/
β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ SKILL.md
β”‚ └── references/
```

## Use Cases β€” Try These Prompts

Copy any prompt below into Claude Code after installing Harness:

**Deep Research**
```
Build a harness for deep research. I need an agent team that can investigate
any topic from multiple angles β€” web search, academic sources, community
sentiment β€” then cross-validate findings and produce a comprehensive report.
```

**Website Development**
```
Build a harness for full-stack website development. The team should handle
design, frontend (React/Next.js), backend (API), and QA testing in a
coordinated pipeline from wireframe to deployment.
```

**Webtoon / Comic Production**
```
Build a harness for webtoon episode production. I need agents for story
writing, character design prompts, panel layout planning, and dialogue
editing. They should review each other's work for style consistency.
```

**YouTube Content Planning**
```
Build a harness for YouTube content creation. The team should research
trending topics, write scripts, optimize titles/tags for SEO, and plan
thumbnail concepts β€” all coordinated by a supervisor agent.
```

**Code Review & Refactoring**
```
Build a harness for comprehensive code review. I want parallel agents
checking architecture, security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks,
and code style β€” then merging all findings into a single report.
```

**Technical Documentation**
```
Build a harness that generates API documentation from this codebase.
Agents should analyze endpoints, write descriptions, generate usage
examples, and review for completeness.
```

**Data Pipeline Design**
```
Build a harness for designing data pipelines. I need agents for schema
design, ETL logic, data validation rules, and monitoring setup that
delegate sub-tasks hierarchically.
```

**Marketing Campaign**
```
Build a harness for marketing campaign creation. The team should research
the target market, write ad copy, design visual concepts, and set up
A/B test plans with iterative quality review.
```

## Coexistence β€” Harness and Neighbors

Harness is not alone in the Claude Code / agent-framework ecosystem. The following repos live in adjacent layers; each is described in a parallel "X is …, Harness is …" form so you can pick the one that fits your need or combine several.

| Repo | Their position | Relationship to Harness |
|------|----------------|-------------------------|
| [coleam00/Archon](https://github.com/coleam00/Archon) | "harness builder" β€” deterministic, repeatable runtime configurations | **Same L3, neighbor sub-layer.** Archon is a Runtime-Configuration Factory, Harness is a Team-Architecture Factory. Pick Archon for runtime determinism, Harness for team architecture, or combine them. |
| [SaehwanPark/meta-harness](https://github.com/SaehwanPark/meta-harness) | Codex port of the same concept | **Same L3, different runtime.** Use Harness on Claude Code, meta-harness on Codex. |
| [affaan-m/ECC](https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code) | "Agent harness performance & workflow layer" (sits on top of existing harnesses) | **Different layer.** ECC is a standardization layer across harnesses; Harness is a factory that generates harnesses. Serial combination possible. |
| [wshobson/agents](https://github.com/wshobson/agents) | Subagent / skill catalog (182 agents, 149 skills) | **Factory ↔ parts supply.** wshobson is a catalog to shop from; Harness designs the team. Absorb wshobson entries as parts inside a Harness-generated team. |
| [LangGraph](https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraph/) | State-graph orchestration, LLM-agnostic | **Different track.** LangGraph is for long-running, state-recoverable orchestration; Harness is for fast Claude-Code-native team design. |

## Built with Harness

### Harness 100

**[revfactory/harness-100](https://github.com/revfactory/harness-100)** β€” 100 production-ready agent team harnesses across 10 domains, available in both English and Korean (200 packages total). Each harness ships with 4-5 specialist agents, an orchestrator skill, and domain-specific skills β€” all generated by this plugin. 1,808 markdown files covering content creation, software development, data/AI, business strategy, education, legal, health, and more.

### Research: A/B Testing Harness Effectiveness

**[revfactory/claude-code-harness](https://github.com/revfactory/claude-code-harness)** β€” A controlled experiment across 15 software engineering tasks measuring the impact of structured pre-configuration on LLM code agent output quality.

| Metric | Without Harness | With Harness | Improvement |
|--------|:-:|:-:|:-:|
| Average Quality Score | 49.5 | 79.3 | **+60%** |
| Win Rate | β€” | β€” | **100%** (15/15) |
| Output Variance | β€” | β€” | **-32%** |

Key finding: effectiveness scales with task complexity β€” the harder the task, the greater the improvement (+23.8 Basic, +29.6 Advanced, +36.2 Expert).

**Exact phrasing to use everywhere:** +60% avg quality (49.5 β†’ 79.3), 15/15 win-rate, βˆ’32% variance (n=15, author-measured A/B, third-party replications pending).

> Full paper: *Hwang, M. (2026). Harness: Structured Pre-Configuration for Enhancing LLM Code Agent Output Quality.*

## Requirements

- [Agent Teams enabled](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/agent-teams): `CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1`

## FAQ

Q1. Isn't "+60%" oversold?

**A.** The +60% figure comes from an **author-measured A/B (n=15, 15 tasks, measured on the sister repo `claude-code-harness`)**. Every citation in this repo pairs the number with the disclosure "n=15, author-measured, third-party replications pending" in the same sentence. For adoption decisions, we recommend running a 2–4 week internal pilot and measuring your own numbers.

**Evidence:**
- Author A/B: [revfactory/claude-code-harness](https://github.com/revfactory/claude-code-harness)
- Paper: *Hwang, M. (2026). Harness: Structured Pre-Configuration for Enhancing LLM Code Agent Output Quality*

Q2. Why "harness factory" and not "harness builder"? Isn't this competing with Archon?

**A.** Archon generates deterministic runtime configurations β€” it's a **Runtime-Configuration Factory**. Harness generates agent team architectures (team structure, message protocols, review gates) β€” it's a **Team-Architecture Factory**. They are **neighbor sub-layers of the same L3 Meta-Factory** and serve different needs. Pick Archon for runtime determinism, Harness for team-architecture patterns, or combine them (design architecture with Harness β†’ deploy runtime with Archon).

**Evidence:**
- Archon self-definition: [clawfit docs/reference-levels.md](https://github.com/hongsw/clawfit/blob/main/docs/reference-levels.md)
- Sub-layer declaration: see the **Category β€” Where Harness Sits** section above
- Archon repo: [github.com/coleam00/Archon](https://github.com/coleam00/Archon)

Q3. Isn't "Claude Code only" too narrow? What about Gemini/Codex?

**A.** Currently the official runtime is Claude Code only. A Codex port of the same concept β€” [SaehwanPark/meta-harness](https://github.com/SaehwanPark/meta-harness) β€” is already public, so Codex teams can start there. Harness chose "Claude-Code-native, deep" over "multi-runtime, shallow"; cross-runtime collaboration with sibling repos (meta-harness, harness-init, OpenRig) is on the roadmap.

**Evidence:**
- Codex port: [github.com/SaehwanPark/meta-harness](https://github.com/SaehwanPark/meta-harness)
- Cross-runtime scaffolder: [github.com/Gizele1/harness-init](https://github.com/Gizele1/harness-init)

## License

Apache 2.0