https://github.com/robert01101101/351-bandcamp

Redesign of the Bandcamp Website for IAT351
https://github.com/robert01101101/351-bandcamp

Last synced: 4 days ago
JSON representation

Redesign of the Bandcamp Website for IAT351

• Host: GitHub
• URL: https://github.com/robert01101101/351-bandcamp
• Owner: Robert01101101
• Created: 2018-10-31T20:21:36.000Z (about 6 years ago)
• Default Branch: master
• Last Pushed: 2018-12-01T07:07:57.000Z (about 6 years ago)
• Last Synced: 2025-01-18T18:12:34.303Z (6 days ago)
• Language: HTML
• Size: 2.87 MB
• Stars: 1
• Watchers: 2
• Forks: 0
• Open Issues: 0
• Metadata Files:
  • Readme: README.md

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

        
# 351-Bandcamp

## Members:

- Logan Buchanan

- Ioana Sandor

- Taylor Wilkinson

- Robert Michels

## Deadline:

November 27 @ 11:59pm

## Project Deliverables:

- Report detailing your team design process detailing these three waves: 

- Wave 1: design for human perceptual, cognitive, and motor performance Did the design process take human capabilities and limitations into account? Were established Wave 1 methods used to define human abilities and to confirm that the design was highly usable for its users?

- Wave 2: design for societal and organizational rules, processes and values Did the design process take rules, ethics, and organizational/social considerations into account. Were established Wave 2 methods used to define the social and organizational contexts in which the design would be used and to confirm that it will integrate in those processes?

- Wave 3: design for user experience Did the design processes show evidence of advanced design thinking and design craft (e.g. ideation, etc.) for the design of the graphical interface? 15pts Wave 4: Integrative HCI How was information about the usability, context, and UX design integrated in the overall design process? Were tradeoffs identified, and if so, how were they dealt with?

- The application or interactive site

- Code and images used in implementing the project

- Peer review of process and contributions of team members (may used to allocate group marks to individual team members)

## Grading Rubric:

- Design for human capabilities. Did the design process take human capabilities and limitations into account? Were established Wave 1 methods used to define human abilities and to confirm that the design was highly usable for its users?

- This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Wave 2: design for societal and organizational rules, processes and values. Did the design process take rules, ethics, and organizational/social considerations into account. Were established Wave 2 methods used to define the social and organizational contexts in which the design would be used and to confirm that it will integrate in those processes?

- This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Wave 3: design for user experience. Did the design processes show evidence of advanced design thinking and design craft (e.g. ideation, etc.) for the design of the graphical interface?

- This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Wave 4: Integrative HCI. How was information about the usability, context, and UX design integrated in the overall design process? Were tradeoffs identified, and if so, how were they dealt with?

## Source:

https://canvas.sfu.ca/courses/39918/assignments/306350