Ecosyste.ms: Awesome

An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.

Awesome Lists | Featured Topics | Projects

https://github.com/rspeer/langcodes

A Python library for working with and comparing language codes.
https://github.com/rspeer/langcodes

Last synced: 13 days ago
JSON representation

A Python library for working with and comparing language codes.

Awesome Lists containing this project

README 

        
# Langcodes: a library for language codes



**langcodes** knows what languages are. It knows the standardized codes that

refer to them, such as `en` for English, `es` for Spanish and `hi` for Hindi.



These are [IETF language tags][]. You may know them by their old name, ISO 639

language codes. IETF has done some important things for backward compatibility

and supporting language variations that you won't find in the ISO standard.



[IETF language tags]: https://www.w3.org/International/articles/language-tags/



It may sound to you like langcodes solves a pretty boring problem. At one

level, that's right. Sometimes you have a boring problem, and it's great when a

library solves it for you.



But there's an interesting problem hiding in here. How do you work with

language codes? How do you know when two different codes represent the same

thing? How should your code represent relationships between codes, like the

following?



* `eng` is equivalent to `en`.

* `fra` and `fre` are both equivalent to `fr`.

* `en-GB` might be written as `en-gb` or `en_GB`. Or as 'en-UK', which is

  erroneous, but should be treated as the same.

* `en-CA` is not exactly equivalent to `en-US`, but it's really, really close.

* `en-Latn-US` is equivalent to `en-US`, because written English must be written

  in the Latin alphabet to be understood.

* The difference between `ar` and `arb` is the difference between "Arabic" and

  "Modern Standard Arabic", a difference that may not be relevant to you.

* You'll find Mandarin Chinese tagged as `cmn` on Wiktionary, but many other

  resources would call the same language `zh`.

* Chinese is written in different scripts in different territories. Some

  software distinguishes the script. Other software distinguishes the territory.

  The result is that `zh-CN` and `zh-Hans` are used interchangeably, as are

  `zh-TW` and `zh-Hant`, even though occasionally you'll need something

  different such as `zh-HK` or `zh-Latn-pinyin`.

* The Indonesian (`id`) and Malaysian (`ms` or `zsm`) languages are mutually

  intelligible.

* `jp` is not a language code. (The language code for Japanese is `ja`, but

  people confuse it with the country code for Japan.)



One way to know is to read IETF standards and Unicode technical reports.

Another way is to use a library that implements those standards and guidelines

for you, which langcodes does.



When you're working with these short language codes, you may want to see the

name that the language is called _in_ a language: `fr` is called "French" in

English. That language doesn't have to be English: `fr` is called "français" in

French. A supplement to langcodes, [`language_data`][language-data], provides

this information.



[language-data]: https://github.com/rspeer/language_data



langcodes is maintained by Elia Robyn Lake a.k.a. Robyn Speer, and is released

as free software under the MIT license.



## Standards implemented



Although this is not the only reason to use it, langcodes will make you more

acronym-compliant.



langcodes implements [BCP 47](http://tools.ietf.org/html/bcp47), the IETF Best

Current Practices on Tags for Identifying Languages. BCP 47 is also known as

RFC 5646. It subsumes ISO 639 and is backward compatible with it, and it also

implements recommendations from the [Unicode CLDR](http://cldr.unicode.org).



langcodes can also refer to a database of language properties and names, built

from Unicode CLDR and the IANA subtag registry, if you install `language_data`.



In summary, langcodes takes language codes and does the Right Thing with them,

and if you want to know exactly what the Right Thing is, there are some

documents you can go read.



# Documentation



## Standardizing language tags



This function standardizes tags, as strings, in several ways.



It replaces overlong tags with their shortest version, and also formats them

according to the conventions of BCP 47:



    >>> from langcodes import *

    >>> standardize_tag('eng_US')

    'en-US'



It removes script subtags that are redundant with the language:



    >>> standardize_tag('en-Latn')

    'en'



It replaces deprecated values with their correct versions, if possible:



    >>> standardize_tag('en-uk')

    'en-GB'



Sometimes this involves complex substitutions, such as replacing Serbo-Croatian

(`sh`) with Serbian in Latin script (`sr-Latn`), or the entire tag `sgn-US`

with `ase` (American Sign Language).



    >>> standardize_tag('sh-QU')

    'sr-Latn-EU'



    >>> standardize_tag('sgn-US')

    'ase'



If *macro* is True, it uses macrolanguage codes as a replacement for the most

common standardized language within that macrolanguage.



    >>> standardize_tag('arb-Arab', macro=True)

    'ar'



Even when *macro* is False, it shortens tags that contain both the

macrolanguage and the language:



    >>> standardize_tag('zh-cmn-hans-cn')

    'zh-Hans-CN'



If the tag can't be parsed according to BCP 47, this will raise a

LanguageTagError (a subclass of ValueError):



    >>> standardize_tag('spa-latn-mx')

    'es-MX'



    >>> standardize_tag('spa-mx-latn')

    Traceback (most recent call last):

        ...

    langcodes.tag_parser.LanguageTagError: This script subtag, 'latn', is out of place. Expected variant, extension, or end of string.



## Language objects



This package defines one class, named Language, which contains the results

of parsing a language tag. Language objects have the following fields,

any of which may be unspecified:



- *language*: the code for the language itself.

- *script*: the 4-letter code for the writing system being used.

- *territory*: the 2-letter or 3-digit code for the country or similar region

  whose usage of the language appears in this text.

- *extlangs*: a list of more specific language codes that follow the language

  code. (This is allowed by the language code syntax, but deprecated.)

- *variants*: codes for specific variations of language usage that aren't

  covered by the *script* or *territory* codes.

- *extensions*: information that's attached to the language code for use in

  some specific system, such as Unicode collation orders.

- *private*: a code starting with `x-` that has no defined meaning.



The `Language.get` method converts a string to a Language instance, and the

`Language.make` method makes a Language instance from its fields.  These values

are cached so that calling `Language.get` or `Language.make` again with the

same values returns the same object, for efficiency.



By default, it will replace non-standard and overlong tags as it interprets

them. To disable this feature and get the codes that literally appear in the

language tag, use the *normalize=False* option.



    >>> Language.get('en-Latn-US')

    Language.make(language='en', script='Latn', territory='US')



    >>> Language.get('sgn-US', normalize=False)

    Language.make(language='sgn', territory='US')



    >>> Language.get('und')

    Language.make()



Here are some examples of replacing non-standard tags:



    >>> Language.get('sh-QU')

    Language.make(language='sr', script='Latn', territory='EU')



    >>> Language.get('sgn-US')

    Language.make(language='ase')



    >>> Language.get('zh-cmn-Hant')

    Language.make(language='zh', script='Hant')



Use the `str()` function on a Language object to convert it back to its

standard string form:



    >>> str(Language.get('sh-QU'))

    'sr-Latn-EU'



    >>> str(Language.make(territory='IN'))

    'und-IN'



### Checking validity



A language code is _valid_ when every part of it is assigned a meaning by IANA.

That meaning could be "private use".



In langcodes, we check the language subtag, script, territory, and variants for

validity. We don't check other parts such as extlangs or Unicode extensions.



For example, `ja` is a valid language code, and `jp` is not:



    >>> Language.get('ja').is_valid()

    True



    >>> Language.get('jp').is_valid()

    False



The top-level function `tag_is_valid(tag)` is possibly more convenient to use,

because it can return False even for tags that don't parse:



    >>> tag_is_valid('C')

    False



If one subtag is invalid, the entire code is invalid:



    >>> tag_is_valid('en-000')

    False



`iw` is valid, though it's a deprecated alias for `he`:



    >>> tag_is_valid('iw')

    True



The empty language tag (`und`) is valid:



    >>> tag_is_valid('und')

    True



Private use codes are valid:



    >>> tag_is_valid('x-other')

    True



    >>> tag_is_valid('qaa-Qaai-AA-x-what-even-is-this')

    True



Language tags that are very unlikely are still valid:



    >>> tag_is_valid('fr-Cyrl')

    True



Tags with non-ASCII characters are invalid, because they don't parse:



    >>> tag_is_valid('zh-普通话')

    False



### Getting alpha3 codes



Before there was BCP 47, there was ISO 639-2. The ISO tried to make room for the

variety of human languages by assigning every language a 3-letter code,

including the ones that already had 2-letter codes.



Unfortunately, this just led to more confusion. Some languages ended up with two

different 3-letter codes for legacy reasons, such as French, which is `fra` as a

"terminology" code, and `fre` as a "biblographic" code. And meanwhile, `fr` was

still a code that you'd be using if you followed ISO 639-1.



In BCP 47, you should use 2-letter codes whenever they're available, and that's

what langcodes does. Fortunately, all the languages that have two different

3-letter codes also have a 2-letter code, so if you prefer the 2-letter code,

you don't have to worry about the distinction.



But some applications want the 3-letter code in particular, so langcodes

provides a method for getting those, `Language.to_alpha3()`. It returns the

'terminology' code by default, and passing `variant='B'` returns the

bibliographic code.



When this method returns, it always returns a 3-letter string.



    >>> Language.get('fr').to_alpha3()

    'fra'

    >>> Language.get('fr-CA').to_alpha3()

    'fra'

    >>> Language.get('fr-CA').to_alpha3(variant='B')

    'fre'

    >>> Language.get('de').to_alpha3()

    'deu'

    >>> Language.get('no').to_alpha3()

    'nor'

    >>> Language.get('un').to_alpha3()

    Traceback (most recent call last):

        ...

    LookupError: 'un' is not a known language code, and has no alpha3 code.



For many languages, the terminology and bibliographic alpha3 codes are the same.



    >>> Language.get('en').to_alpha3(variant='T')

    'eng'

    >>> Language.get('en').to_alpha3(variant='B')

    'eng'



When you use any of these "overlong" alpha3 codes in langcodes, they normalize

back to the alpha2 code:



    >>> Language.get('zho')

    Language.make(language='zh')



## Working with language names



The methods in this section require an optional package called `language_data`.

You can install it with `pip install language_data`, or request the optional

"data" feature of langcodes with `pip install langcodes[data]`.



The dependency that you put in setup.py should be `langcodes[data]`.



### Describing Language objects in natural language



It's often helpful to be able to describe a language code in a way that a user

(or you) can understand, instead of in inscrutable short codes. The

`display_name` method lets you describe a Language object *in a language*.



The `.display_name(language, min_score)` method will look up the name of the

language. The names come from the IANA language tag registry, which is only in

English, plus CLDR, which names languages in many commonly-used languages.



The default language for naming things is English:



    >>> Language.make(language='fr').display_name()

    'French'



    >>> Language.make().display_name()

    'Unknown language'



    >>> Language.get('zh-Hans').display_name()

    'Chinese (Simplified)'



    >>> Language.get('en-US').display_name()

    'English (United States)'



But you can ask for language names in numerous other languages:



    >>> Language.get('fr').display_name('fr')

    'français'



    >>> Language.get('fr').display_name('es')

    'francés'



    >>> Language.make().display_name('es')

    'lengua desconocida'



    >>> Language.get('zh-Hans').display_name('de')

    'Chinesisch (Vereinfacht)'



    >>> Language.get('en-US').display_name('zh-Hans')

    '英语（美国）'



Why does everyone get Slovak and Slovenian confused? Let's ask them.



    >>> Language.get('sl').display_name('sl')

    'slovenščina'

    >>> Language.get('sk').display_name('sk')

    'slovenčina'

    >>> Language.get('sl').display_name('sk')

    'slovinčina'

    >>> Language.get('sk').display_name('sl')

    'slovaščina'



If the language has a script or territory code attached to it, these will be

described in parentheses:



    >>> Language.get('en-US').display_name()

    'English (United States)'



Sometimes these can be the result of tag normalization, such as in this case

where the legacy tag 'sh' becomes 'sr-Latn':



    >>> Language.get('sh').display_name()

    'Serbian (Latin)'



    >>> Language.get('sh', normalize=False).display_name()

    'Serbo-Croatian'



Naming a language in itself is sometimes a useful thing to do, so the

`.autonym()` method makes this easy, providing the display name of a language

in the language itself:



    >>> Language.get('fr').autonym()

    'français'

    >>> Language.get('es').autonym()

    'español'

    >>> Language.get('ja').autonym()

    '日本語'

    >>> Language.get('en-AU').autonym()

    'English (Australia)'

    >>> Language.get('sr-Latn').autonym()

    'srpski (latinica)'

    >>> Language.get('sr-Cyrl').autonym()

    'српски (ћирилица)'



The names come from the Unicode CLDR data files, and in English they can

also come from the IANA language subtag registry. Together, they can give

you language names in the 196 languages that CLDR supports.



### Describing components of language codes



You can get the parts of the name separately with the methods `.language_name()`,

`.script_name()`, and `.territory_name()`, or get a dictionary of all the parts

that are present using the `.describe()` method. These methods also accept a

language code for what language they should be described in.



    >>> shaw = Language.get('en-Shaw-GB')

    >>> shaw.describe('en')

    {'language': 'English', 'script': 'Shavian', 'territory': 'United Kingdom'}



    >>> shaw.describe('es')

    {'language': 'inglés', 'script': 'shaviano', 'territory': 'Reino Unido'}



### Recognizing language names in natural language



As the reverse of the above operations, you may want to look up a language by

its name, converting a natural language name such as "French" to a code such as

'fr'.



The name can be in any language that CLDR supports (see "Ambiguity" below).



    >>> import langcodes

    >>> langcodes.find('french')

    Language.make(language='fr')



    >>> langcodes.find('francés')

    Language.make(language='fr')



However, this method currently ignores the parenthetical expressions that come from

`.display_name()`:



    >>> langcodes.find('English (Canada)')

    Language.make(language='en')



There is still room to improve the way that language names are matched, because

some languages are not consistently named the same way. The method currently

works with hundreds of language names that are used on Wiktionary.



#### Ambiguity



For the sake of usability, `langcodes.find()` doesn't require you to specify what

language you're looking up a language in by name. This could potentially lead to

a conflict: what if name "X" is language A's name for language B, and language C's

name for language D?



We can collect the language codes from CLDR and see how many times this

happens. In the majority of cases like that, B and D are codes whose names are

also overlapping in the _same_ language and can be resolved by some general

principle.



For example, no matter whether you decide "Tagalog" refers to the language code

`tl` or the largely overlapping code `fil`, that distinction doesn't depend on

the language you're saying "Tagalog" in. We can just return `tl` consistently.



    >>> langcodes.find('tagalog')

    Language.make(language='tl')



In the few cases of actual interlingual ambiguity, langcodes won't match a result.

You can pass in a `language=` parameter to say what language the name is in.



For example, there are two distinct languages called "Tonga" in various languages.

They are `to`, the language of Tonga which is called "Tongan" in English; and `tog`,

a language of Malawi that can be called "Nyasa Tonga" in English.



    >>> langcodes.find('tongan')

    Language.make(language='to')



    >>> langcodes.find('nyasa tonga')

    Language.make(language='tog')



    >>> langcodes.find('tonga')

    Traceback (most recent call last):

    ...

    LookupError: Can't find any language named 'tonga'



    >>> langcodes.find('tonga', language='id')

    Language.make(language='to')



    >>> langcodes.find('tonga', language='ca')

    Language.make(language='tog')



Other ambiguous names written in Latin letters are "Kiga", "Mbundu", "Roman", and "Ruanda".



## Demographic language data



The `Language.speaking_population()` and `Language.writing_population()`

methods get Unicode's estimates of how many people in the world use a

language.



As with the language name data, this requires the optional `language_data`

package to be installed.



`.speaking_population()` estimates how many people speak a language. It can

be limited to a particular territory with a territory code (such as a country

code).



    >>> Language.get('es').speaking_population()

    487664083



    >>> Language.get('pt').speaking_population()

    237135429



    >>> Language.get('es-BR').speaking_population()

    76218



    >>> Language.get('pt-BR').speaking_population()

    192661560



    >>> Language.get('vo').speaking_population()

    0



Script codes will be ignored, because the script is not involved in speaking:



    >>> Language.get('es-Hant').speaking_population() ==\

    ... Language.get('es').speaking_population()

    True



`.writing_population()` estimates how many people write a language.

        

    >>> all = Language.get('zh').writing_population()

    >>> all

    1240326057



    >>> traditional = Language.get('zh-Hant').writing_population()

    >>> traditional

    37019589



    >>> simplified = Language.get('zh-Hans').writing_population()

    >>> all == traditional + simplified

    True



The estimates for "writing population" are often overestimates, as described

in the [CLDR documentation on territory data][overestimates]. In most cases,

they are derived from published data about literacy rates in the places where

those languages are spoken. This doesn't take into account that many literate

people around the world speak a language that isn't typically written, and

write in a _different_ language.



[overestimates]: https://unicode-org.github.io/cldr-staging/charts/39/supplemental/territory_language_information.html



Like `.speaking_population()`, this can be limited to a particular territory:



    >>> Language.get('zh-Hant-HK').writing_population()

    6439733

    >>> Language.get('zh-Hans-HK').writing_population()

    338933



## Comparing and matching languages



The `tag_distance` function returns a number from 0 to 134 indicating the

distance between the language the user desires and a supported language.



The distance data comes from CLDR v38.1 and involves a lot of judgment calls

made by the Unicode consortium.



### Distance values



This table summarizes the language distance values:



| Value | Meaning                                                                                                       | Example

| ----: | :------                                                                                                       | :------

|     0 | These codes represent the same language, possibly after filling in values and normalizing.                    | Norwegian Bokmål → Norwegian

|   1-3 | These codes indicate a minor regional difference.                                                             | Australian English → British English

|   4-9 | These codes indicate a significant but unproblematic regional difference.                                     | American English → British English

| 10-24 | A gray area that depends on your use case. There may be problems with understanding or usability.             | Afrikaans → Dutch, Wu Chinese → Mandarin Chinese

| 25-50 | These languages aren't similar, but there are demographic reasons to expect some intelligibility.             | Tamil → English, Marathi → Hindi

| 51-79 | There are large barriers to understanding.                                                                    | Japanese → Japanese in Hepburn romanization

| 80-99 | These are different languages written in the same script.                                                     | English → French, Arabic → Urdu

|  100+ | These languages have nothing particularly in common.                                                          | English → Japanese, English → Tamil



See the docstring of `tag_distance` for more explanation and examples.



### Finding the best matching language



Suppose you have software that supports any of the `supported_languages`. The

user wants to use `desired_language`.



The function `closest_supported_match(desired_language, supported_languages)`

lets you choose the right language, even if there isn't an exact match.

It returns the language tag of the best-supported language, even if there

isn't an exact match.



The `max_distance` parameter lets you set a cutoff on what counts as language

support. It has a default of 25, a value that is probably okay for simple

cases of i18n, but you might want to set it lower to require more precision.



    >>> closest_supported_match('fr', ['de', 'en', 'fr'])

    'fr'



    >>> closest_supported_match('pt', ['pt-BR', 'pt-PT'])

    'pt-BR'



    >>> closest_supported_match('en-AU', ['en-GB', 'en-US'])

    'en-GB'



    >>> closest_supported_match('af', ['en', 'nl', 'zu'])

    'nl'



    >>> closest_supported_match('und', ['en', 'und'])

    'und'



    >>> print(closest_supported_match('af', ['en', 'nl', 'zu'], max_distance=10))

    None



A similar function is `closest_match(desired_language, supported_language)`,

which returns both the best matching language tag and the distance. If there is

no match, it returns ('und', 1000).



    >>> closest_match('fr', ['de', 'en', 'fr'])

    ('fr', 0)



    >>> closest_match('sh', ['hr', 'bs', 'sr-Latn', 'sr-Cyrl'])

    ('sr-Latn', 0)



    >>> closest_match('id', ['zsm', 'mhp'])

    ('zsm', 14)



    >>> closest_match('ja', ['ja-Latn-hepburn', 'en'])

    ('und', 1000)



    >>> closest_match('ja', ['ja-Latn-hepburn', 'en'], max_distance=60)

    ('ja-Latn-hepburn', 50)



## Further API documentation



There are many more methods for manipulating and comparing language codes,

and you will find them documented thoroughly in [the code itself][code].



The interesting functions all live in this one file, with extensive docstrings

and annotations. Making a separate Sphinx page out of the docstrings would be

the traditional thing to do, but here it just seems redundant. You can go read

the docstrings in context, in their native habitat, and they'll always be up to

date.



[Code with documentation][code]



[code]: https://github.com/rspeer/langcodes/blob/master/langcodes/__init__.py



# Changelog



## Version 3.3 (November 2021)



- Updated to CLDR v40.



- Updated the IANA subtag registry to version 2021-08-06.



- Bug fix: recognize script codes that appear in the IANA registry even if

  they're missing from CLDR for some reason. 'cu-Cyrs' is valid, for example.



- Switched the build system from `setuptools` to `poetry`.



To install the package in editable mode before PEP 660 is better supported, use

`poetry install` instead of `pip install -e .`.



## Version 3.2 (October 2021)



- Supports Python 3.6 through 3.10.



- Added the top-level function `tag_is_valid(tag)`, for determining if a string

  is a valid language tag without having to parse it first.



- Added the top-level function `closest_supported_match(desired, supported)`,

  which is similar to `closest_match` but with a simpler return value. It

  returns the language tag of the closest match, or None if no match is close

  enough.



- Bug fix: a lot of well-formed but invalid language codes appeared to be

  valid, such as 'aaj' or 'en-Latnx', because the regex could match a prefix of

  a subtag. The validity regex is now required to match completely.



- Bug fixes that address some edge cases of validity:



  - A language tag that is entirely private use, like 'x-private', is valid

  - A language tag that uses the same extension twice, like 'en-a-bbb-a-ccc',

    is invalid

  - A language tag that uses the same variant twice, like 'de-1901-1901', is

    invalid

  - A language tag with two extlangs, like 'sgn-ase-bfi', is invalid



- Updated dependencies so they are compatible with Python 3.10, including

  switching back from `marisa-trie-m` to `marisa-trie` in `language_data`.



- In bugfix release 3.2.1, corrected cases where the parser accepted

  ill-formed language tags:



  - All subtags must be made of between 1 and 8 alphanumeric ASCII characters

  - Tags with two extension 'singletons' in a row (`en-a-b-ccc`) should be

    rejected



## Version 3.1 (February 2021)



- Added the `Language.to_alpha3()` method, for getting a three-letter code for a

  language according to ISO 639-2.



- Updated the type annotations from obiwan-style to mypy-style.



## Version 3.0 (February 2021)



- Moved bulky data, particularly language names, into a separate

  `language_data` package. In situations where the data isn't needed,

  `langcodes` becomes a smaller, pure-Python package with no dependencies.



- Language codes where the language segment is more than 4 letters no longer

  parse: Language.get('nonsense') now returns an error.



  (This is technically stricter than the parse rules of BCP 47, but there are

  no valid language codes of this form and there should never be any. An

  attempt to parse a language code with 5-8 letters is most likely a mistake or

  an attempt to make up a code.)



- Added a method for checking the validity of a language code.



- Added methods for estimating language population.



- Updated to CLDR 38.1, which includes differences in language matching.



- Tested on Python 3.6 through 3.9; no longer tested on Python 3.5.



## Version 2.2 (February 2021)



- Replaced `marisa-trie` dependency with `marisa-trie-m`, to achieve

  compatibility with Python 3.9.



## Version 2.1 (June 2020)



- Added the `display_name` method to be a more intuitive way to get a string

  describing a language code, and made the `autonym` method use it instead of

  `language_name`.



- Updated to CLDR v37.



- Previously, some attempts to get the name of a language would return its

  language code instead, perhaps because the name was being requested in a

  language for which CLDR doesn't have name data. This is unfortunate because

  names and codes should not be interchangeable.



  Now we fall back on English names instead, which exists for all IANA codes.

  If the code is unknown, we return a string such as "Unknown language [xx]".



## Version 2.0 (April 2020)



Version 2.0 involves some significant changes that may break compatibility with 1.4,

in addition to updating to version 36.1 of the Unicode CLDR data and the April 2020

version of the IANA subtag registry.



This version requires Python 3.5 or later.



### Match scores replaced with distances



Originally, the goodness of a match between two different language codes was defined

in terms of a "match score" with a maximum of 100. Around 2016, Unicode started

replacing this with a different measure, the "match distance", which was defined

much more clearly, but we had to keep using the "match score".



As of langcodes version 2.0, the "score" functions (such as

`Language.match_score`, `tag_match_score`, and `best_match`) are deprecated.

They'll keep using the deprecated language match tables from around CLDR 27.



For a better measure of the closeness of two language codes, use `Language.distance`,

`tag_distance`, and `closest_match`.



### 'region' renamed to 'territory'



We were always out of step with CLDR here. Following the example of the IANA

database, we referred to things like the 'US' in 'en-US' as a "region code",

but the Unicode standards consistently call it a "territory code".



In langcodes 2.0, parameters, dictionary keys, and attributes named `region`

have been renamed to `territory`.  We try to support a few common cases with

deprecation warnings, such as looking up the `region` property of a Language

object.



A nice benefit of this is that when a dictionary is displayed with 'language',

'script', and 'territory' keys in alphabetical order, they are in the same

order as they are in a language code.