https://github.com/sambacha/swap-compare

Solidity/Ethereum knowledge test: trade/swap implementation assessment
https://github.com/sambacha/swap-compare

ethereum flashbots mev skill-test skill-tests solidity sushiswap uniswap

Last synced: 2 months ago
JSON representation

Solidity/Ethereum knowledge test: trade/swap implementation assessment

• Host: GitHub
• URL: https://github.com/sambacha/swap-compare
• Owner: sambacha
• License: mit
• Created: 2021-08-13T11:30:25.000Z (over 3 years ago)
• Default Branch: master
• Last Pushed: 2024-02-23T08:42:20.000Z (11 months ago)
• Last Synced: 2024-10-12T08:15:26.008Z (3 months ago)
• Topics: ethereum, flashbots, mev, skill-test, skill-tests, solidity, sushiswap, uniswap
• Language: Solidity
• Homepage:
• Size: 1.69 MB
• Stars: 2
• Watchers: 3
• Forks: 1
• Open Issues: 1
• Metadata Files:
  • Readme: README.md
  • License: LICENSE

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

        
# SwapMeHarder

> [!IMPORTANT]

> This is an example showing the usage difference between case/switch vs. If/else 

Compare the implementation of the two different  functions in `contracts/SwapMeHarder.sol`. 

They are suppose to implement a swap functionality for trading. They achieve the same* results, but from slightly different ways.

> [!WARNING]

> *same* is, well, you will see.




## Objectives

calculate: transaction cost 


calculate: execution cost 


determine best implementation for general use case 


determine best implementation for bespoke/specific use case 


## Brownie points: 

Any defects or anti-patterns? 


Any additional optimizations? *(Yul versions do not count!)*

## Key Results

Decided which one to use, and any additional caveats 


What further enhancements could be made?  


## Summary 

Which implementation is gas minimizing? 


Which implementation is `better`? Does the answer depend on pairs/markets/etc? 





## License 

MIT

## Notice

![](.github/iu.png)