https://github.com/spine-tools/spineopt_backbone_comparison

Comparing SpineOpt and Backbone on a 6-unit system
https://github.com/spine-tools/spineopt_backbone_comparison

Last synced: about 1 month ago
JSON representation

Comparing SpineOpt and Backbone on a 6-unit system

• Host: GitHub
• URL: https://github.com/spine-tools/spineopt_backbone_comparison
• Owner: spine-tools
• Created: 2023-08-11T08:07:49.000Z (over 1 year ago)
• Default Branch: main
• Last Pushed: 2023-11-28T12:35:36.000Z (about 1 year ago)
• Last Synced: 2024-02-02T17:53:03.372Z (11 months ago)
• Language: GAMS
• Size: 8.33 MB
• Stars: 0
• Watchers: 6
• Forks: 0
• Open Issues: 0
• Metadata Files:
  • Readme: README.md

Awesome Lists containing this project

README

        
# SpineOpt_Backbone_Comparison

Comparing SpineOpt and Backbone on a 6-unit system

  

- This repository contains results of translation of a 6-unit system from Backbone to SpineOpt. The aim is to make it easier to understand the similarities and differences between the data formats of the two models, for possible translations between them, or from a generic data format to each of them.

- Using scenarios, different features can be turned on and off.

- Each scenario goes through an small comparison workflow between the SpineOpt system and the Backbone system. In particular, there is a first code to handle the format of results from Backbone, and compare them to SpineOpt's results.

- In the word document "Notes_Translation_Backbone_SpineOpt.docx" you will be able to find more precisions on the system, observations on the differences between SpineOpt and Backbone and some conclusions about them.

Side note: the Spine-Toolbox project uses Backbone. A valid GAMS licence is required to use it.

Related issue: 

[https://github.com/spine-tools/SpineOpt.jl/issues/733](https://github.com/spine-tools/SpineOpt.jl/issues/733)