Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers
Simple one-liner tests for common Rails functionality
https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers
rails rspec ruby testing
Last synced: 4 days ago
JSON representation
Simple one-liner tests for common Rails functionality
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers
- Owner: thoughtbot
- License: mit
- Created: 2010-12-15T22:41:52.000Z (almost 14 years ago)
- Default Branch: main
- Last Pushed: 2024-10-08T14:27:13.000Z (2 months ago)
- Last Synced: 2024-12-02T13:02:18.446Z (11 days ago)
- Topics: rails, rspec, ruby, testing
- Language: Ruby
- Homepage: https://matchers.shoulda.io
- Size: 15.1 MB
- Stars: 3,527
- Watchers: 81
- Forks: 910
- Open Issues: 43
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.md
- Changelog: CHANGELOG.md
- Contributing: CONTRIBUTING.md
- License: LICENSE
- Codeowners: CODEOWNERS
- Security: SECURITY.md
Awesome Lists containing this project
- my-awesome-rails-gem - shoulda-matchers - Shoulda-matchers provides serveral matchers for testing common Rails functionality. (Testing / Omniauth)
- toolbox - shoulda-matchers - If I can use rails to write a one-liner validation, why shouldn't I be able to use a one-line test for that? (Libraries)
- awesome-rspec - shoulda-matchers - One-liners to test common Rails functionality. (Matchers)
- awesome-rails-gem - shoulda-matchers - Shoulda-matchers provides serveral matchers for testing common Rails functionality. (Testing / Omniauth)
README
# Shoulda Matchers [![Gem Version][version-badge]][rubygems] [![Build Status][github-actions-badge]][github-actions] [![Total Downloads][downloads-total]][rubygems] [![Downloads][downloads-badge]][rubygems]
[version-badge]: https://img.shields.io/gem/v/shoulda-matchers.svg
[rubygems]: https://rubygems.org/gems/shoulda-matchers
[github-actions-badge]: https://img.shields.io/github/actions/workflow/status/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/ci.yml?branch=main
[github-actions]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/actions
[downloads-total]: https://img.shields.io/gem/dt/shoulda-matchers.svg
[downloads-badge]: https://img.shields.io/gem/dtv/shoulda-matchers.svg
[downloads-badge]: https://img.shields.io/gem/dtv/shoulda-matchers.svg[![shoulda-matchers][logo]][website]
[logo]: https://matchers.shoulda.io/images/shoulda-matchers-logo.png
[website]: https://matchers.shoulda.io/Shoulda Matchers provides RSpec- and Minitest-compatible one-liners to test
common Rails functionality that, if written by hand, would be much longer, more
complex, and error-prone.## Quick links
📖 **[Read the documentation for the latest version][rubydocs].**
📢 **[See what's changed in recent versions][changelog].**[rubydocs]: https://matchers.shoulda.io/docs
[changelog]: CHANGELOG.md## Table of contents
* [Getting started](#getting-started)
* [RSpec](#rspec)
* [Minitest](#minitest)
* [Usage](#usage)
* [On the subject of `subject`](#on-the-subject-of-subject)
* [Availability of RSpec matchers in example groups](#availability-of-rspec-matchers-in-example-groups)
* [`should` vs `is_expected.to`](#should-vs-is_expectedto)
* [Matchers](#matchers)
* [ActiveModel matchers](#activemodel-matchers)
* [ActiveRecord matchers](#activerecord-matchers)
* [ActionController matchers](#actioncontroller-matchers)
* [Independent matchers](#independent-matchers)
* [Extensions](#extensions)
* [Contributing](#contributing)
* [Compatibility](#compatibility)
* [Versioning](#versioning)
* [Team](#team)
* [Copyright/License](#copyright-license)
* [About thoughtbot](#about-thoughtbot)## Getting started
### RSpec
Start by including `shoulda-matchers` in your Gemfile:
```ruby
group :test do
gem 'shoulda-matchers', '~> 6.0'
end
```Then run `bundle install`.
Now you need to configure the gem by telling it:
* which matchers you want to use in your tests
* that you're using RSpec so that it can make those matchers available in
your example groups#### Rails apps
If you're working on a Rails app, simply place this at the bottom of
`spec/rails_helper.rb` (or in a support file if you so choose):```ruby
Shoulda::Matchers.configure do |config|
config.integrate do |with|
with.test_framework :rspec
with.library :rails
end
end
```#### Non-Rails apps
If you're not working on a Rails app, but you still make use of ActiveRecord or
ActiveModel in your project, you can still use this gem too! In that case,
you'll want to place the following configuration at the bottom of
`spec/spec_helper.rb`:```ruby
Shoulda::Matchers.configure do |config|
config.integrate do |with|
with.test_framework :rspec# Keep as many of these lines as are necessary:
with.library :active_record
with.library :active_model
end
end
```### Minitest
If you're using our umbrella gem [Shoulda], then make sure that you're using the
latest version:```ruby
group :test do
gem 'shoulda', '~> 4.0'
end
```[Shoulda]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda
Otherwise, add `shoulda-matchers` to your Gemfile:
```ruby
group :test do
gem 'shoulda-matchers', '~> 6.0'
end
```Then run `bundle install`.
Now you need to configure the gem by telling it:
* which matchers you want to use in your tests
* that you're using Minitest so that it can make those matchers available in
your test case classes#### Rails apps
If you're working on a Rails app, simply place this at the bottom of
`test/test_helper.rb`:```ruby
Shoulda::Matchers.configure do |config|
config.integrate do |with|
with.test_framework :minitest
with.library :rails
end
end
```#### Non-Rails apps
If you're not working on a Rails app, but you still make use of ActiveRecord or
ActiveModel in your project, you can still use this gem too! In that case,
you'll want to place the following configuration at the bottom of
`test/test_helper.rb`:```ruby
Shoulda::Matchers.configure do |config|
config.integrate do |with|
with.test_framework :minitest# Keep as many of these lines as are necessary:
with.library :active_record
with.library :active_model
end
end
```## Usage
Most of the matchers provided by this gem are useful in a Rails context, and as
such, can be used for different parts of a Rails app:* [database models backed by ActiveRecord](#activerecord-matchers)
* [non-database models, form objects, etc. backed by
ActiveModel](#activemodel-matchers)
* [controllers](#actioncontroller-matchers)
* [routes](#routing-matchers) (RSpec only)
* [Rails-specific features like `delegate`](#independent-matchers)As the name of the gem indicates, most matchers are designed to be used in
"one-liner" form using the `should` macro, a special directive available in both
RSpec and [Shoulda]. For instance, a model test case may look something like:``` ruby
# RSpec
RSpec.describe MenuItem, type: :model do
describe 'associations' do
it { should belong_to(:category).class_name('MenuCategory') }
enddescribe 'validations' do
it { should validate_presence_of(:name) }
it { should validate_uniqueness_of(:name).scoped_to(:category_id) }
end
end# Minitest (Shoulda)
class MenuItemTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
context 'associations' do
should belong_to(:category).class_name('MenuCategory')
endcontext 'validations' do
should validate_presence_of(:name)
should validate_uniqueness_of(:name).scoped_to(:category_id)
end
end
```[See below](#matchers) for the full set of matchers that you can use.
### On the subject of `subject`
For both RSpec and Shoulda, the **subject** is an implicit reference to the
object under test, and through the use of `should` as demonstrated above, all of
the matchers make use of `subject` internally when they are run. A `subject` is
always set automatically by your test framework in any given test case; however,
in certain cases it can be advantageous to override it. For instance, when
testing validations in a model, it is customary to provide a valid model instead
of a fresh one:``` ruby
# RSpec
RSpec.describe Post, type: :model do
describe 'validations' do
# Here we're using FactoryBot, but you could use anything
subject { build(:post) }it { should validate_presence_of(:title) }
end
end# Minitest (Shoulda)
class PostTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase
context 'validations' do
subject { build(:post) }should validate_presence_of(:title)
end
end
```When overriding the subject in this manner, then, it's important to provide the
correct object. **When in doubt, provide an instance of the class under test.**
This is particularly necessary for controller tests, where it is easy to
accidentally write something like:``` ruby
RSpec.describe PostsController, type: :controller do
describe 'GET #index' do
subject { get :index }# This may work...
it { should have_http_status(:success) }
# ...but this will not!
it { should permit(:title, :body).for(:post) }
end
end
```In this case, you would want to use `before` rather than `subject`:
``` ruby
RSpec.describe PostsController, type: :controller do
describe 'GET #index' do
before { get :index }# Notice that we have to assert have_http_status on the response here...
it { expect(response).to have_http_status(:success) }
# ...but we do not have to provide a subject for render_template
it { should render_template('index') }
end
end
```### Availability of RSpec matchers in example groups
#### Rails projects
If you're using RSpec, then you're probably familiar with the concept of example
groups. Example groups can be assigned tags order to assign different behavior
to different kinds of example groups. This comes into play especially when using
`rspec-rails`, where, for instance, controller example groups, tagged with
`type: :controller`, are written differently than request example groups, tagged
with `type: :request`. This difference in writing style arises because
`rspec-rails` mixes different behavior and methods into controller example
groups vs. request example groups.Relying on this behavior, Shoulda Matchers automatically makes certain matchers
available in certain kinds of example groups:* ActiveRecord and ActiveModel matchers are available only in model example
groups, i.e., those tagged with `type: :model` or in files located under
`spec/models`.
* ActionController matchers are available only in controller example groups,
i.e., those tagged with `type: :controller` or in files located under
`spec/controllers`.
* The `route` matcher is available in routing example groups, i.e., those
tagged with `type: :routing` or in files located under `spec/routing`.
* Independent matchers are available in all example groups.As long as you're using Rails, you don't need to worry about these details —
everything should "just work".#### Non-Rails projects
**What if you are using ActiveModel or ActiveRecord outside of Rails, however,
and you want to use model matchers in a certain example group?** Then you'll
need to manually include the module that holds those matchers into that example
group. For instance, you might have to say:``` ruby
RSpec.describe MySpecialModel do
include Shoulda::Matchers::ActiveModel
include Shoulda::Matchers::ActiveRecord
end
```If you have a lot of similar example groups in which you need to do this, then
you might find it more helpful to tag your example groups appropriately, then
instruct RSpec to mix these modules into any example groups that have that tag.
For instance, you could add this to your `rails_helper.rb`:```ruby
RSpec.configure do |config|
config.include(Shoulda::Matchers::ActiveModel, type: :model)
config.include(Shoulda::Matchers::ActiveRecord, type: :model)
end
```And from then on, you could say:
```ruby
RSpec.describe MySpecialModel, type: :model do
# ...
end
```### `should` vs `is_expected.to`
In this README and throughout the documentation, you'll notice that we use the
`should` form of RSpec's one-liner syntax over `is_expected.to`. Beside being
the namesake of the gem itself, this is our preferred syntax as it's short and
sweet. But if you prefer to use `is_expected.to`, you can do that too:```ruby
RSpec.describe Person, type: :model do
it { is_expected.to validate_presence_of(:name) }
end
```### A Note on Testing Style
If you inspect the source code, you'll notice quickly that `shoulda-matchers`
is largely implemented using reflections and other introspection methods that
Rails provides. On first sight, this might seem to go against the common
practice of testing behavior rather than implementation. However, as the
available matchers indicate, we recommend that you treat `shoulda-matchers` as
a tool to help you ensure correct configuration and adherence to best practices
and idiomatic Rails in your models and controllers - especially for aspects
that in your experience are often insufficiently tested, such as ActiveRecord
validations or controller callbacks (a.k.a. the "framework-y" parts).For testing your application's unique business logic, however, we recommend focusing on
behavior and outcomes over implementation details. This approach will better support
refactoring and ensure that your tests remain resilient to changes in how your code
is structured. While no generalized testing tool can fully capture the nuances of your
specific domain, you can draw inspiration from shoulda-matchers to write custom
matchers that align more closely with your application's needs.## Matchers
Here is the full list of matchers that ship with this gem. If you need details
about any of them, make sure to [consult the documentation][rubydocs]!### ActiveModel matchers
* **[allow_value](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/allow_value_matcher.rb)**
tests that an attribute is valid or invalid if set to one or more values.
*(Aliased as #allow_values.)*
* **[have_secure_password](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/have_secure_password_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `has_secure_password`.
* **[validate_absence_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_absence_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_absence_of`.
* **[validate_acceptance_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_acceptance_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_acceptance_of`.
* **[validate_confirmation_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_confirmation_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_confirmation_of`.
* **[validate_exclusion_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_exclusion_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_exclusion_of`.
* **[validate_inclusion_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_inclusion_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_inclusion_of`.
* **[validate_length_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_length_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_length_of`.
* **[validate_numericality_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_numericality_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_numericality_of`.
* **[validate_presence_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_presence_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_presence_of`.
* **[validate_comparison_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_model/validate_comparison_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_comparison_of`.### ActiveRecord matchers
* **[accept_nested_attributes_for](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/accept_nested_attributes_for_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of the `accepts_nested_attributes_for` macro.
* **[belong_to](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/association_matcher.rb)**
tests your `belongs_to` associations.
* **[define_enum_for](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/define_enum_for_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of the `enum` macro.
* **[have_and_belong_to_many](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/association_matcher.rb)**
tests your `has_and_belongs_to_many` associations.
* **[have_delegated_type](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/association_matcher.rb#L687)**
tests usage of the `delegated_type` macro.
* **[have_db_column](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/have_db_column_matcher.rb)**
tests that the table that backs your model has a specific column.
* **[have_db_index](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/have_db_index_matcher.rb)**
tests that the table that backs your model has an index on a specific column.
* **[have_implicit_order_column](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/have_implicit_order_column.rb)**
tests usage of `implicit_order_column`.
* **[have_many](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/association_matcher.rb#L328)**
tests your `has_many` associations.
* **[have_many_attached](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/have_attached_matcher.rb)**
tests your `has_many_attached` associations.
* **[have_one](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/association_matcher.rb#L598)**
tests your `has_one` associations.
* **[have_one_attached](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/have_attached_matcher.rb)**
tests your `has_one_attached` associations.
* **[have_readonly_attribute](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/have_readonly_attribute_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of the `attr_readonly` macro.
* **[have_rich_text](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/have_rich_text_matcher.rb)**
tests your `has_rich_text` associations.
* **[serialize](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/serialize_matcher.rb)** tests
usage of the `serialize` macro.
* **[validate_uniqueness_of](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/validate_uniqueness_of_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of `validates_uniqueness_of`.
* **[normalize](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/normalize_matcher.rb)** tests
usage of the `normalize` macro
* **[encrypt](lib/shoulda/matchers/active_record/encrypt_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of the `encrypts` macro.### ActionController matchers
* **[filter_param](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/filter_param_matcher.rb)**
tests parameter filtering configuration.
* **[permit](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/permit_matcher.rb)** tests
that an action places a restriction on the `params` hash.
* **[redirect_to](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/redirect_to_matcher.rb)**
tests that an action redirects to a certain location.
* **[render_template](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/render_template_matcher.rb)**
tests that an action renders a template.
* **[render_with_layout](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/render_with_layout_matcher.rb)**
tests that an action is rendered with a certain layout.
* **[rescue_from](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/rescue_from_matcher.rb)**
tests usage of the `rescue_from` macro.
* **[respond_with](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/respond_with_matcher.rb)**
tests that an action responds with a certain status code.
* **[route](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/route_matcher.rb)** tests
your routes.
* **[set_session](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/set_session_matcher.rb)**
makes assertions on the `session` hash.
* **[set_flash](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/set_flash_matcher.rb)**
makes assertions on the `flash` hash.
* **[use_after_action](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/callback_matcher.rb#L29)**
tests that an `after_action` callback is defined in your controller.
* **[use_around_action](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/callback_matcher.rb#L75)**
tests that an `around_action` callback is defined in your controller.
* **[use_before_action](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/callback_matcher.rb#L4)**
tests that a `before_action` callback is defined in your controller.### Routing matchers
* **[route](lib/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/route_matcher.rb)** tests
your routes.### Independent matchers
* **[delegate_method](lib/shoulda/matchers/independent/delegate_method_matcher.rb)**
tests that an object forwards messages to other, internal objects by way of
delegation.## Extensions
Over time our community has created extensions to Shoulda Matchers. If you've
created something that you want to share, please [let us know][new-issue]!* **[shoulda-matchers-cucumber]** – Adds support for using Shoulda Matchers in
Cucumber tests.[new-issue]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/issues/new
[shoulda-matchers-cucumber]: https://github.com/majioa/shoulda-matchers-cucumber## Contributing
Have a fix for a problem you've been running into or an idea for a new feature
you think would be useful? Take a look at the [Contributing
document](CONTRIBUTING.md) for instructions on setting up the repo on your
machine, understanding the codebase, and creating a good pull request.## Compatibility
Shoulda Matchers is tested and supported against Ruby 3.0+, Rails
6.1+, RSpec 3.x, and Minitest 5.x.- For Ruby < 2.4 and Rails < 4.1 compatibility, please use [v3.1.3][v3.1.3].
- For Ruby < 3.0 and Rails < 6.1 compatibility, please use [v4.5.1][v4.5.1].[v3.1.3]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/tree/v3.1.3
[v4.5.1]: https://github.com/thoughtbot/shoulda-matchers/tree/v4.5.1## Versioning
Shoulda Matchers follows Semantic Versioning 2.0 as defined at
.## Team
Shoulda Matchers is currently maintained by [Pedro Paiva][VSPPedro] and [Matheus
Sales][matsales28]. Previous maintainers include [Elliot Winkler][mcmire],
[Gui Albuk][guialbuk], [Jason Draper][drapergeek], [Melissa Xie][mxie],
[Gabe Berke-Williams][gabebw], [Ryan McGeary][rmm5t], [Joe Ferris][jferris], and
[Tammer Saleh][tammersaleh].[VSPPedro]: https://github.com/VSPPedro
[matsales28]: https://github.com/matsales28
[mcmire]: https://github.com/mcmire
[guialbuk]: https://github.com/guialbuk
[drapergeek]: https://github.com/drapergeek
[mxie]: https://github.com/mxie
[gabebw]: https://github.com/gabebw
[rmm5t]: https://github.com/rmm5t
[jferris]: https://github.com/jferris
[tammersaleh]: https://github.com/tammersaleh## Copyright/License
Shoulda Matchers is copyright © Tammer Saleh and [thoughtbot,
inc][thoughtbot-website]. It is free and opensource software and may be
redistributed under the terms specified in the [LICENSE](LICENSE) file.[thoughtbot-website]: https://thoughtbot.com
## About thoughtbot
![thoughtbot](https://thoughtbot.com/thoughtbot-logo-for-readmes.svg)
This repo is maintained and funded by thoughtbot, inc.
The names and logos for thoughtbot are trademarks of thoughtbot, inc.We love open source software!
See [our other projects][community].
We are [available for hire][hire].[community]: https://thoughtbot.com/community?utm_source=github
[hire]: https://thoughtbot.com/hire-us?utm_source=github