Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/ttsiodras/miniforth
A tiny Forth I built in a week. Blog post: https://www.thanassis.space/miniforth.html
https://github.com/ttsiodras/miniforth
arduino cpp forth
Last synced: 3 days ago
JSON representation
A tiny Forth I built in a week. Blog post: https://www.thanassis.space/miniforth.html
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/ttsiodras/miniforth
- Owner: ttsiodras
- License: mit
- Created: 2021-06-26T21:00:44.000Z (over 3 years ago)
- Default Branch: master
- Last Pushed: 2021-12-07T16:50:27.000Z (about 3 years ago)
- Last Synced: 2023-03-10T22:52:56.917Z (almost 2 years ago)
- Topics: arduino, cpp, forth
- Language: C++
- Homepage:
- Size: 707 KB
- Stars: 71
- Watchers: 6
- Forks: 7
- Open Issues: 0
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.md
- License: LICENSE
Awesome Lists containing this project
README
*( Wrote [a blog post about this here](https://www.thanassis.space/miniforth.html) )*
It was raining hard, a week ago.
And what could you possibly do on a rainy Saturday afternoon?
Well...
You can make a Forth interpreter/compiler from scratch...
...then put it inside a 1.5$ Blue Pill microcontroller...
...and finally, inside an Arduino UNO...
... within its tiny 2K RAM!Click on the image to watch it blinking the LED of my Arduino:
[![Here's a video of it action, blinking my Arduino :-)](https://img.youtube.com/vi/xePollbCzow/0.jpg)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xePollbCzow)
I haven't done anything even *remotely* close to this in decades...
I *loved* building it.The rainy afternoon turned into a week-long hackfest *(was looking
forward every day to the post-work FORTH-tinkering in the afternoon...)*The result: a tiny, mini, micro Forth. In portable C++ :-)
It has...- basic arithmetic
- star-slash (double-word accurate muldiv)
- literals
- constants
- variables
- direct memory access
- string printing
- reseting
- comments
- nested DO/LOOP
- comparisons
- nested IF/ELSE/THEN
- ...and of course, functions (Forth words)Here's an ascii-cast recording of it in action:
[![Recording of building and uploading on an Arduino UNO](https://asciinema.org/a/423649.svg)](https://asciinema.org/a/423649?autoplay=1)
Read the test scenario below to see my supported Forth constructs.
# Portability, ArduinoSTL and Valgrind/AddressSanitizer checks
I meant it when I said "portable". Part of my reasoning was, that
in addition to targeting multiple platforms (e.g. BluePill and
Arduino) I wanted to be able to use Valgrind and AddressSanitizer
to detect - in the host! - any issues I have with my memory handling.Since I had embedded targets in mind, I tried ArduinoSTL - but it was too
wasteful memory-wise. It also made the build process significantly slower.
I therefore built my own [memory pool, as well as list, tuple and string-like
C++ templates](https://github.com/ttsiodras/MiniForth/tree/master/src/mini_stl.h). It was a nice challenge, re-inventing a tiny C++ STL...And I understand STL a lot better now, after building small pieces of it myself :-)
# Simulation / Debugging
I setup simulation via [simavr](https://github.com/buserror/simavr.git).
This tremendously improved my developing speed, since a simulator
spawns and runs much faster than the real board. Due to the code
being portable, debugging took place mostly in the host GDB;
and after Valgrind and AddressSanitizer gave their blessing, I usually
found out that the simulator (and the real board) worked fine as well.# BluePill vs Arduino UNO
Thanks to ArduinoSTL, I quickly reached the point of running inside the
BluePill. The 1.5$ mini-monster has 10 times more SRAM than an Arduino UNO;
so in a couple of days, I had a [working branch](https://github.com/ttsiodras/MiniForth/tree/BluePill-STM32F103C).![The 1.5$ 'Beast'](contrib/BluePill.jpg "The 1.5$ 'Beast'")
But as said above, that wasn't nearly enough to make it work in my
Arduino UNO. That required far more work *(see below)*.As for the BluePill, I should note that, as in all my other embedded targets,
I prefer a development workflow that is based on normal bootloaders
*(not on programmers)*. I therefore burned the
[stm32duino](https://github.com/rogerclarkmelbourne/STM32duino-bootloader)
bootloader on the BluePill, which allowed me to easily program it
in subsequent iterations via the USB connection (and a simple `make upload`).The same USB connection would then function as a serial port immediately
afterwards - allowing me to interact with the newly uploaded Forth in the
BluePill.The screenshot below is from a `tmux`: on the left, the output from `make upload`;
and on the right, I used `picocom` to interact with my mini-Forth
over the serial port:![Compiling, uploading and testing](contrib/itworks.jpg "Compiling, uploading and testing")
# Memory - the final frontier
That covered the first two days.
But when I tried compiling for the Arduino UNO, I realised that the ArduinoSTL
was not enough. I run out of memory...So I built my own [mini-STL](https://github.com/ttsiodras/MiniForth/tree/master/src/mini_stl.h),
and tightly controlled *all* memory utilisation.I also used macro-magic to move all strings to Flash at compile-time
(see `dprintf` in the code)... And saved memory everywhere I could,
re-using error messages across various operations - and storing the
entire array of native operations in Flash.Nothing flexes your coding muscles as much as optimising; whether it is
for speed or for space. See the implementation of ".S" for example,
where the (obvious) stack reversal code is also the most wasteful...
Changing it to a slower but memory-preserving algorithm allowed me
to use ".S" even when almost all my memory is full.# C++ vs C
I know that many developers hate C++. I even wrote a
[blog post](https://www.thanassis.space/cpp.html) about it.And I understand why - they see code like this...
#include "mini_stl.h"
template
typename forward_list::box *forward_list::_freeList = NULL;
...and they start screaming - "what the hell is that", "incomprehensible
madness", etc.But there are very important benefits in using C++ - and templates
in particular. You write less code, with no additional run-time or
memory overhead compared to C, and with a lot more compile-time checks
that watch your back (for things that would otherwise blow up in your face).See my Optional for example, that emulates (badly) the optional
type of Rust/OCaml/F#/Scala/Kotlin etc. It **forces** you to check
your returned error codes:Optional Forth::needs_a_number(const __FlashStringHelper *msg)
{
if (_stack.empty())
return error(emptyMsgFlash, msg);
auto topVal = *_stack.begin();
if (topVal._kind == StackNode::LIT)
return topVal._u.intVal;
else
return FAILURE;
}You can't "forget" to check the potential for a failure coded inside
your returned value - because your code has to "unwrap" it. I could have
done this better, but I chose to implement it via simple tuples
(this was a one-weeks-afternoons hack, after all :-)As for the template "magic" incantation above - it *is* true magic: My
`forward_list` template is using free-lists to store the `pop_front`-ed
elements and reuse them in subsequent allocations. I wanted these free-lists to
be global (i.e. static members) because lists of the same type must re-use a
single, commonly-shared free-list. The magic spell tells the compiler I want to
instantiate these globals *once*, for each type T that I use in any
lists in my code.# My Forth test scenario - including a FizzBuzz!
Yep, FizzBuzz - we are fully Turing complete. And would surely pass
Joel's interview :-)." Reset... " RESET
." Check comments... " \ Yes, we support the new-style comments :-)
." Computing simple addition of 3 + 4... " 3 4 + .
." Is 1 = 2 ?... " 1 2 = .
." Is 1 > 2 ?... " 1 2 > .
." Is 1 < 2 ?... " 1 2 < .
." Define pi at double-word precision... " : pi 355 113 */ ;
." Use definition to compute 10K times PI... " 10000 pi .
." Check: 23 mod 7... " 23 7 MOD .
." Defining 1st level function1... " : x2 2 * ;
." Defining 1st level function2... " : p4 4 + ;
." 2nd level word using both - must print 24... " 10 x2 p4 .
." Defining a variable with value 123... " 123 variable ot3
." Printing variable's value... " ot3 @ .
." Defining The Constant (TM)... " 42 constant lifeUniverse
." Printing The Constant (TM)... " lifeUniverse .
." Setting the variable to The Constant (TM)... " lifeUniverse ot3 !
." Printing variable's value... " ot3 @ .
." Setting the variable to hex 0x11... " $11 ot3 !
." Printing variable's value... " ot3 @ .
." Setting the variable to binary 10100101... " %10100101 ot3 !
." Printing variable's value... " ot3 @ .
." Defining helper... " : p5 5 U.R . ;
." Defining 3 times loop... " : x3lp 3 0 DO I p5 LOOP ;
." Calling loop... " x3lp
." Defining loop calling loop 2 times... " : x6lp 2 0 DO x3lp LOOP ;
." Nested-looping 2x3 times... " x6lp
." Inline: " : m 3 1 DO 3 1 DO CR J p5 I p5 ." = " J I * p5 LOOP LOOP ;
." Use inline loops with two indexes... " m
." Make multiples of 7 via DUP... " : m7s 10 0 DO DUP I * . LOOP DROP ;
." Print them and DROP the 7... " 7 m7s
." Reset... " RESET
\ Time for Turing completeness...
." Let's do Fizz-Buzz! " \ Turing Completeness check...
\ fizz ( n -- 0_or_1 n )
." Define fizz... " : fizz DUP 3 MOD 0 = IF ." fizz " 1 ELSE 0 THEN SWAP ;
\ buzz ( n -- 0_or_1 n )
." Define buzz... " : buzz DUP 5 MOD 0 = IF ." buzz " 1 ELSE 0 THEN SWAP ;
\ emitNum ( 0_or_1 0_or_1 n -- )
." Define emitNum... " : emitNum ROT ROT + 0 = if . ELSE DROP THEN ;
\ mainloop ( n -- )
." Define mainloop... " : mainloop ." ( " fizz buzz emitNum ." ) " ;
\ fb ( -- )
." Define fizzbuzz... " : fb 37 1 DO I mainloop LOOP ;
." Run it! " fb
." Report memory usage... " .S
." All done! "# Automation
I am a strong believer in automation. The final form of my `Makefile`
therefore has many rules - e.g. `make arduino-sim` - that automate
various parts of the workflow.Here's what they do:
- **arduino**: Compiles the code for Arduino UNO - builds `src/tmp/myforth.ino.{elf,hex}`
- **arduino-sim**: After building, launches the compiled mini-Forth in `simduino`.
- **upload**: After building, uploads to an Arduino attached to the port
configured inside `config.mk`.- **terminal**: After uploading, launches a `picocom` terminal with
all appropriate settings to interact with my Forth.- **x86**: Builds for x86. Actually, should easily build for any native target (ARM, etc).
- **test-address-sanitizer**: Uses the x86 binary to test the code, executing
all steps of the scenario shown above. The binary is built with the
address sanitizer enabled (to detect memory issues).- **test-valgrind**: Same, but with Valgrind.
- **test-simulator**: Spawns `simavr` and sends the entire test scenario shown
above to it - while showing the responses received from it.- **test-arduino**: Sends the entire test scenario shown above to an
Arduino Uno connected to the port specified in `config.mk`
and shows the responses received over that serial port.- **blink-arduino**: Sends the "hello word" of the HW world: a tiny
[Forth program](testing/blinky.fs) blinking the Arduino's LED.Another example of automation - the complete test scenario shown in the
previous section, is not just an example in the documentation; it is
extracted automatically from this README and fed into the Valgrind and
AddressSanitizer tests... and also into the Python testing script that
sends the data to the board in real-time.[DRY](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself), folks.
# Conclusion
I thoroughly enjoyed building this. I know full well that Forths are not
supposed to be built in C++; they are supposed to be built in assembly,
and also, utilise the Flash to store the user-compiled code at run-time.But that wasn't the point of this - the point was to have fun and learn Forth.
And what better way to learn a language than to actually implement it! :-)And... as a child of the 80s... I now know first-hand what
[Jupiter Ace](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter_Ace) was about :-)Fork the code, and enjoy tinkering with it!
Thanassis.