Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/twlite/node-opus-benchmark
Benchmarking @discordjs/opus, mediaplex, @evan/opus and opusscript
https://github.com/twlite/node-opus-benchmark
Last synced: about 1 month ago
JSON representation
Benchmarking @discordjs/opus, mediaplex, @evan/opus and opusscript
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/twlite/node-opus-benchmark
- Owner: twlite
- Created: 2023-08-06T07:36:09.000Z (over 1 year ago)
- Default Branch: main
- Last Pushed: 2023-09-17T07:28:35.000Z (about 1 year ago)
- Last Synced: 2024-09-20T00:28:10.601Z (about 2 months ago)
- Language: JavaScript
- Homepage: https://twlite.github.io/node-opus-benchmark/
- Size: 3.12 MB
- Stars: 0
- Watchers: 1
- Forks: 0
- Open Issues: 0
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.md
Awesome Lists containing this project
README
# node-opus-benchmark
Benchmarking node.js libopus bindings
## Run Yourself
```bash
$ pnpm install
$ pnpm bench
```
## Results
Benchmarking was done by using a constant sample of opus and pcm data. The benchmark was done among following packages using [mitata](https://npm.im/mitata) as the benchmarking library:
### [mediaplex](https://npm.im/mediaplex)
Mediaplex provides native bindings to libopus 1.4 and is a drop-in replacement for [@discordjs/opus](https://npm.im/@discordjs/opus).
### [@discordjs/opus](https://npm.im/@discordjs/opus)
Native bindings to libopus v1.3
### [opusscript](https://npm.im/opusscript)
JS bindings for libopus 1.4, ported with Emscripten.
### [@evan/opus](https://npm.im/@evan/opus) & [@evan/wasm](https://npm.im/@evan/wasm)
Fast opus bindings for node and browsers.
---
> Note: I ran this test on github codespaces, so the results may vary on your machine.
### OpusEncoder
```js
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
runtime: node v20.6.1 (x64-linux)
benchmark time (avg) (min … max) p75 p99 p995
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------
• OpusEncoder
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------
mediaplex 479.46 µs/iter (442.81 µs … 1.86 ms) 465.78 µs 730.83 µs 789.35 µs
@discordjs/opus 544.07 µs/iter (517.77 µs … 1.77 ms) 536.05 µs 804.11 µs 1.26 ms
opusscript 306.54 µs/iter (208.27 µs … 25.62 ms) 234.58 µs 1.27 ms 1.82 ms
opusscript (no wasm) 5.81 ms/iter (4.25 ms … 12.72 ms) 7.63 ms 12.08 ms 12.72 ms
@evan/opus 418.43 µs/iter (394.61 µs … 699.62 µs) 407.55 µs 654.99 µs 681.89 µs
@evan/opus (wasm) 884.1 µs/iter (668.14 µs … 9.36 ms) 730.79 µs 2.21 ms 6.08 ms
@evan/wasm 810.87 µs/iter (613.38 µs … 10.04 ms) 674.75 µs 2.65 ms 4.99 ms
summary for OpusEncoder
opusscript
1.37x faster than @evan/opus
1.56x faster than mediaplex
1.77x faster than @discordjs/opus
2.65x faster than @evan/wasm
2.88x faster than @evan/opus (wasm)
18.96x faster than opusscript (no wasm)
```
### OpusDecoder
```js
cpu: AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
runtime: node v20.6.1 (x64-linux)
benchmark time (avg) (min … max) p75 p99 p995
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------
• OpusDecoder
------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------------------
mediaplex 47.76 µs/iter (41.1 µs … 1.21 ms) 45.1 µs 90.48 µs 118.01 µs
@discordjs/opus 42.24 µs/iter (38.26 µs … 442.65 µs) 40.09 µs 76.77 µs 83.23 µs
opusscript 75.95 µs/iter (57.5 µs … 13.6 ms) 60.24 µs 243.81 µs 250.49 µs
opusscript (no wasm) 548.76 µs/iter (157.45 µs … 12.2 ms) 376.78 µs 7.92 ms 9.24 ms
@evan/opus 51.62 µs/iter (38.03 µs … 5.73 ms) 59.61 µs 116.26 µs 144.65 µs
@evan/opus (wasm) 65.7 µs/iter (51.92 µs … 8.21 ms) 55.65 µs 179.4 µs 185.44 µs
@evan/wasm 63.6 µs/iter (56.45 µs … 11.44 ms) 57.75 µs 131.86 µs 164.64 µs
summary for OpusDecoder
@discordjs/opus
1.13x faster than mediaplex
1.22x faster than @evan/opus
1.51x faster than @evan/wasm
1.56x faster than @evan/opus (wasm)
1.8x faster than opusscript
12.99x faster than opusscript (no wasm)
```