https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews

W3C specs and API reviews
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews

Last synced: about 2 months ago
JSON representation

W3C specs and API reviews

• Host: GitHub
• URL: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews
• Owner: w3ctag
• License: cc0-1.0
• Created: 2013-06-27T19:37:14.000Z (over 11 years ago)
• Default Branch: main
• Last Pushed: 2024-09-08T10:34:51.000Z (4 months ago)
• Last Synced: 2024-09-08T12:33:55.430Z (4 months ago)
• Language: JavaScript
• Size: 288 KB
• Stars: 326
• Watchers: 114
• Forks: 55
• Open Issues: 56
• Metadata Files:
  • Readme: README.md
  • License: LICENSE
  • Code of conduct: CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md

Awesome Lists containing this project

• awesome-web-browsers - W3C specs and API reviews

README

        
# W3C TAG Specification Reviews

This repository is for specification reviews by the [W3C Technical Architecture Group](http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/); usually (but not always) from W3C Working Groups.

## How reviews are performed/prioritized

We use the [issues list](https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues) to track our reviews; you can request a review for your spec by adding a new issue. _Please include a link to the relevant specification(s)_. As well, please include info on timeliness of the required review, whether a security review / privacy been done and the expectation of what happens next after the review. We have included a useful template for new issues that should lead you through the process. In most cases the review will be completed and documented in the comments field of the issue itself.

If you have general questions about the design review process, the application of the Web Platform Design Principles or other aspects of web platform architecture or design, please feel free to [open up a discussion thread](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/discussions).

Generally speaking, we will discuss and review in our own issue list and cross-link to relevant issues in the specs we are reviewing. See https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/112

## Code of Conduct

Discussions in this repo are subject to the [W3C Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct](https://www.w3.org/Consortium/cepc/).

## More detailed reviews

In some cases we have prepared more detailed review documents in response to request for review. The ones we have prepared thus far are: 

 * [CSS Font Display](./2015/09/CSS-Font-Display.md)

 * [CSS Regions](./2015/01/CSS%20Regions.md)

 * [Encrypted Media Extensions](./2014/10/eme.md)

 * [File URI](./2015/07/file_uri.md)

 * [Fingerprinting Guidance for Web Authors](./2015/05/fingerprint.md)

 * [HTTP 209](./2014/04/http-209.md)

 * [Navigation-Timing](./2015/09/Navigation-Timing.md)

 * [Near Field Communication (NFC) API](./2015/10/nfc-feedback.md)

 * [Orientation Lock API](./2013/07/OrientationLock.md)

 * [Permissions API](./2015/03/Permissions.md)

 * [Presentation API](./2015/presentation-api.md)

 * [Push API](./2013/08/Push%20API.md)

 * [Quota Management API](./2014/02/quota-management-api.md)

 * [Upgrade Insecure Connection](./2015/04/Upgrade_Insecure.md)

 * [Web Animations API](./2013/10/Web%20Animations.md)

 * [Web Audio API](./2013/07/WebAudio.md)

 * [Web Crypto API](./2013/11/WebCrypto.md)