https://playing-with-dust.github.io/nominumbers/

Experimental kusama staking analysis
https://playing-with-dust.github.io/nominumbers/

Last synced: 9 days ago
JSON representation

Experimental kusama staking analysis

• Host: GitHub
• URL: https://playing-with-dust.github.io/nominumbers/
• Owner: playing-with-dust
• License: gpl-3.0
• Created: 2021-04-23T08:10:31.000Z (over 3 years ago)
• Default Branch: production
• Last Pushed: 2022-01-29T19:05:43.000Z (almost 3 years ago)
• Last Synced: 2024-08-02T19:33:46.611Z (4 months ago)
• Language: JavaScript
• Size: 1.86 MB
• Stars: 0
• Watchers: 1
• Forks: 0
• Open Issues: 7
• Metadata Files:
  • Readme: README.md
  • License: LICENSE

Awesome Lists containing this project

• awesome-dot - Nominumbers - This open-source app reads subscan and tries to collect your total (Community Projects / Oracles)

README

        
# nominumbers

[Kusama](https://kusama.network) is a non-extinction causing cryptocurrency, part of the

[Polkadot network](https://polkadot.network/). Instead of 'miners' using energy to validate

transactions as in Bitcoin, the community 'nominates' trustworthy

'validators' (that work efficiently using ordinary servers) and

who redistribute a small share of their awards to their nominators in

return.

There is a lot of information on how to choose validators but not so

much on judging how they have actually done in relation to your

specific nomination choices - this is just an experiment trying to do

something like that. Each nomination is loaded and a percentage of

your payout is shown next to them. This might make it easier to tune

and select a good mix of nominations, but isn't really a judgement on

the validators performance.

The algorithm is not perfect as it can be difficult to follow the

trail in retrospect - sometimes payouts are batched and more than one

of your nominated validators will be present in the transaction, I

haven't figured out if you can tell which one was active for you in

that era. In this case we divide the payout equally and lower a

"confidence" metric as we can't be sure - mainly we want to see

nominations that are not activated much, so perhaps this doesn't

matter.

## Try it

* [Github hosted](https://playing-with-dust.github.io/nominumbers/)

* (IPFS for v1.0 soon)

## Run nominumbers locally

1. [Download the zip](https://github.com/playing-with-dust/nominumbers/archive/refs/heads/production.zip).

2. Extract to your device.

3. Point your browser at `nominumbers-production/index.html`.

## Release info

### v1.0rc1

* Added support for polkadot and westend

* Currency conversion for USD/EUR/GBP: totals, reward and daily prices added

* Download report as CSV file for tax calculations

* User definable/arbitrary start time

* Automatically collects validators nominated during the specified time period

* Added batch_all payout support

(IPFS hash coming soon)

### v0.4

* Added reward info including possible eras (towards income tax calculations)

* Added "click on icon = address to copy buffer" feature

* Fixed extrinsic parsing when params is an empty string

* Fixed percentage in batch calls (was % of all validators in payout, not nominations)

* [IPFS](https://gateway.ipfs.io/ipns/k51qzi5uqu5dib1fq1xzstlnsbrv032lqe40iesofk0ioquvojjutvkqddgdqw)

* [Cloudflare IPFS](https://cloudflare-ipfs.com/ipns/k51qzi5uqu5dib1fq1xzstlnsbrv032lqe40iesofk0ioquvojjutvkqddgdqw)

* IPFS hash: k51qzi5uqu5dib1fq1xzstlnsbrv032lqe40iesofk0ioquvojjutvkqddgdqw

## Building

    $ npm install

    $ browserify -p esmify src/index.js -o bundle.js

* Complaints -> [email protected]

* Problems -> [Issues](https://github.com/playing-with-dust/nominumbers/issues)

This project is kindly supported by the [Kusama Treasury](https://kusama.subscan.io/treasury_tip/0xf22af71734034b6fea46fcde7df56ead363beed687eb55e26a84691171d755aa)