Ecosyste.ms: Awesome
An open API service indexing awesome lists of open source software.
https://github.com/redpanda-data/awesome-distributed-transactions
Awesome list of distributed transactions
https://github.com/redpanda-data/awesome-distributed-transactions
List: awesome-distributed-transactions
Last synced: 3 months ago
JSON representation
Awesome list of distributed transactions
- Host: GitHub
- URL: https://github.com/redpanda-data/awesome-distributed-transactions
- Owner: redpanda-data
- Created: 2021-01-10T07:19:40.000Z (almost 4 years ago)
- Default Branch: main
- Last Pushed: 2021-11-08T17:31:50.000Z (almost 3 years ago)
- Last Synced: 2024-04-10T05:19:45.321Z (7 months ago)
- Homepage:
- Size: 37.1 KB
- Stars: 723
- Watchers: 44
- Forks: 36
- Open Issues: 2
-
Metadata Files:
- Readme: README.md
Awesome Lists containing this project
- ultimate-awesome - awesome-distributed-transactions - Awesome list of distributed transactions. (Other Lists / PowerShell Lists)
README
# Awesome distributed transactions
A curated selection of distributed transactions protocols## Highly Available Transactions
### Transactional Causal Consistency
[Cure: Strong semantics meets high availability and low latency](https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01270776/document)
[Stronger Semantics for Low-Latency Geo-Replicated Storage](https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi13/technical-sessions/presentation/lloyd) (aka Eiger)
[Don’t Settle for Eventual: Scalable Causal Consistency for Wide-Area Storage with COPS](https://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs6452/2012sp/papers/cops-sosp11.pdf)
### Stronger than read committed (MAV & RA)
n
MAV provides "cut isolation" and atomicity. RA is MAV which prevents fractured reads.[Highly Available Transactions: Virtues and Limitations](https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol7/p181-bailis.pdf)
[Scalable Atomic Visibility with RAMP Transactions](http://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~alig/papers/ramp.pdf)
## Weaker than snapshot isolation levels (PSI, PC-PSI, NMSI)
Compared to snapshot isolation (SI) PSI, PC-PSI & NMSI allows "long fork" anomaly.
[Database Replication Using Generalized Snapshot Isolation](https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/53561/files/srds2005-gsi.pdf)
[Transactional storage for geo-replicated systems](http://www.news.cs.nyu.edu/~jinyang/pub/walter-sosp11.pdf) (aka Walter, PSI)
[I Can’t Believe It’s Not Causal! Scalable Causal Consistency with No Slowdown Cascades](https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi17/technical-sessions/presentation/mehdi) (aka Occult, PC-PSI)
[Non-Monotonic Snapshot Isolation](https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00643430v4/document) (aka Jessy, NMSI)
[Blotter: Low Latency Transactions for Geo-Replicated Storage](https://www.gsd.inesc-id.pt/~rodrigo/blotter-www2017.pdf) (NMSI)
## Snapshot isolation
[Large-scale Incremental Processing Using Distributed Transactions and Notifications](https://research.google/pubs/pub36726/) (aka Percolator)
## Serializability
[Notes on Data Base Operating Systems](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F3-540-08755-9_9) (aka 2PC, two-phase commit, it all started there)
Let's put 2PC coordinator on Paxos:
* [Reducing the Cost for Non-Blocking in Atomic Commitment](https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.29.6196&rank=1) (aka MD3PC)
* [Increasing the Resilience of Distributed and Replicated Database Systems](https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.48.3204&rank=1) (aka E3PC)
* [Consensus on Transaction Commit](https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.159.6749&rank=1) (aka paxos commit)[CockroachDB: The Resilient Geo-Distributed SQL Database](https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3318464.3386134) (Parallel Commits over Paxos)
[Spanner: Google’s Globally-Distributed Database](https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/research.google.com/en//archive/spanner-osdi2012.pdf) (2PC over Paxos)
Concurrency control schemes:
* [Extracting More Concurrency from Distributed Transactions](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi14/osdi14-paper-mu.pdf) (aka RoCoCo)
* [An Evaluation of Distributed Concurrency Control](https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol10/p553-harding.pdf)
* [Strong consistency is not hard to get: Two-Phase Locking and Two-Phase Commit on Thousands of Cores](https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol12/p2325-barthels.pdf)
* Independent transactions (aka one-shot transactions):* [Granola: Low-Overhead Distributed Transaction Coordination](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/atc12/atc12-final118.pdf)
* [Consolidating Concurrency Control and Consensus for Commits under Conflicts](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-mu.pdf) (aka Janus)
* [The End of an Architectural Era: (It’s Time for a Complete Rewrite)](https://hstore.cs.brown.edu/papers/hstore-endofera.pdf) (serial execution, aka H-Store)Deterministic ordering:
* [Calvin: Fast Distributed Transactions for Partitioned Database Systems](http://cs.yale.edu/homes/thomson/publications/calvin-sigmod12.pdf) (deterministic transaction, OLLP)
* [SLOG: Serializable, Low-latency, Geo-replicated Transactions](http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol12/p1747-ren.pdf)
* [Ocean Vista: Gossip-Based Visibility Control for Speedy Geo-Distributed Transactions](http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol12/p1471-fan.pdf)Blending of replication with transaction processing
* [Building Consistent Transactions with Inconsistent Replication](https://irenezhang.net/papers/tapir-sosp15.pdf) (aka TAPIR)
* [Meerkat: Multicore-Scalable Replicated Transactions Following the Zero-Coordination Principle](https://drkp.net/papers/meerkat-eurosys20.pdf)## Special hardware
[The End of a Myth: Distributed Transactions Can Scale](http://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol10/p685-zamanian.pdf/) (aka NAM-DB, SI)
[No compromises: distributed transactions with consistency, availability, and performance](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/SOSP15-final227.pdf) (aka FaRM, serializability)
[FaSST: Fast, Scalable and Simple Distributed Transactions with Two-Sided (RDMA) Datagram RPCs](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-kalia.pdf)
[Eris: Coordination-Free Consistent Transactions Using In-Network Concurrency Control](https://drkp.net/papers/eris-sosp17.pdf) (serializability, independent transactions, deterministic transaction, OLLP)
## Limits of distributed transactions
[The SNOW Theorem and Latency-Optimal Read-Only Transactions](https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/osdi16/osdi16-lu.pdf)
[Causal Consistency and Latency Optimality: Friend or Foe?](https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.04237)
[Distributed Transactional Systems Cannot Be Fast](https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.09106)
[Distributed transactional reads: the strong, the quick, the fresh and the impossible](https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.01698)
## Testing
[Elle: Inferring Isolation Anomalies from Experimental Observations](https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.10554)